Peer Review Process
The editorial board practices double-blind peer review. This process involves the following:
- First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.
- Following the decision of the editors, the manuscripts submitted are sent to at least two external experts in the corresponding field. The manuscript passes double-blind peer review, neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other.
- Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision. The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.
Before submitting an article, read the requirements according to which our reviewers evaluate your article, and check whether your work meets the requirements.
Deadline double-blind peer review 2-6 months
- Once you submit your article, it will be sent for review. Our editorial staff is practicing a double-blind peer review
- Get response from reviewers. If adjustment is then necessary to take them into account, and return an e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- If there are no corrections or all the remarks made by the reviewers are corrected, the article will be accepted for publication in the journal based on the results of double-blind review.
Reviewers should refrain from uploading manuscripts to the LLM software or using other LLM technologies that could lead to a breach of confidentiality.