Enamel art within art discourse. Historiographical research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-2180.37.2020.221440Keywords:
historiography, enamel art, discourse, artistic enamel, hot enamel, the technique of hot artistic enamel, fine arts, decorative art, jewelry.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to shed light on the state of the scientific study of the process of the development of enamel art in the context of art. Methodology. In accordance with this goal, a set of research methods of contemporary art criticism based on an anthropic approach to the analysis of artistic phenomena, as well as methods of heuristic and hermeneutic cognition combined with the use of historical-chronological, systemic methods, were selected. The use of these methods of research contributed to obtaining their own results. An analysis of historiography has shown that there is a scientific discourse on the place and role of the enamel art in artistic creation that emerged in the early 21st century. The scientific novelty of the obtained results is the formulation and development of a topical, little-researched theme of the genesis and evolution of Ukrainian enamel art. The results of the study of the essence of enamel art can be an important component in the study of contemporary art and the development of art science. Conclusions. It is concluded that enamel art in Ukraine has acquired the value of an artistic phenomenon that has its history, theoretical basis, definite periodization, technical and technological basis. The historiographical study of the artistic discourse of enamel art has shown that there is a sufficient amount of scientific literature on the history of enamel art, and the genesis and development of hot enamel technique in different periods of historical development is considered and characterized. Based on the anthropic principle, the refinement of established scientific views on the historical progress of enamel. In the theory of art, there is an attempt of scientists to establish the place and role of the easel and monumental enamel art in the structure of art. On the basis of the art discourse developed in Ukrainian science, the author concludes that enamel art has acquired genre characteristics of a particular type of art and has a syncretic character.References
Dovghanj Ju.O. (2008). Emaljjerne mystectvo v Ukrajini: Istorychnyj dosvid ta suchasnyj stan. Dys. na zdob. nauk. stup. kand. myst. za spec. 17.00.05 (obrazotvorche mystectvo). Kyjivsjkyj nacionaljnyj universytet budivnyctva i arkhitektury. Kyiv. [in Ukraine]
Dovghanj Ju.O. (2007). Suchasne emaljjerne mystectvo pivdnja Ukrajiny. Visnyk Kharkivsjkoji derzhavnoji akademiji dyzajnu i mystectv. Kharkiv: KhDADM. #12. S. 40-47. [in Ukraine]
Dovghanj Ju.O. (2007). Novi aspekty vykorystannja gharjachoji emali v arkhitekturnomu seredovyshhi. Mystectvoznavstvo Ukrajiny. K.: SPD Pughachov O.V. Kyiv. Vyp. 8. 84-88; Dovghanj Ju.O. (2005). Novi aspekty khudozhnjo-dekoratyvnogho ozdoblennja inter'jeriv i ekster'jeriv. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannja. K.: KNUBA. Vyp. 14. S. 159-163. [in Ukraine]
Dovghanj Ju.O. (2009). Emaljjerne mystectvo v Ukrajini: istorychnyj dosvid ta suchasnyj stan. Avtoref. Dys. na zdob. nauk. stup. kand. myst. Kharkiv: KhDADiM. [in Ukraine]
Dovghanj Ju.O. (2007). Shljakhy rozvytku stankovoji emali v Ukrajini. Tradyciji ta novaciji u vyshhij arkhitekturno-khudozhnij osviti, Pid zaghaljnoju redakcijeju N.Je. Treghub. Kharkiv: KhDADM. 4,5,6. S. 27-29. [in Ukraine]
Andrejko S.S. (2015). Razvytye russkoj domongholjskoj эmaly v kontekste ystoryko-kuljturnogho vzaymodejstvyja Rusy y Vyzanty. Vestnyk YrGhTU. 4(99), 181 – 185. [in Russia]
Kara-Vasyljjeva T., Cheghusova Z. (2005). Dekoratyvne mystectvo Ukrajiny KhKh stolittja. K.: Lybidj, 265. [in Ukraine]
Shmaghalo R.T. (2015). Encyklopedija khudozhnjogho metalu. T.2. Khudozhnij metal Ukrajiny XX – poch. XXI st. Ljviv: Apriori. [in Ukraine]
Shmaghalo R.T. (2015). Encyklopedija khudozhnjogho metalu. T.1. Svitovyj ta ukrajinsjkyj khudozhnij metal. Klasyfikacija, terminologhija, stylistyka, ekspertyza. Ljviv: LNAM. [in Ukraine]
Rybakov B.A. (1984). Myr ystoryy. Nachaljnыe veka russkoj ystoryy. M.: Molodaja ghvardyja. 348 s. [in Ukraine]
Borodaj Ju. O. (2013). Ukrajinsjka emalj. Aljbom-katalogh. K.: Ukr. pysjmennyk, 264. [in Ukraine]
Borodaj Julija. (2004). Ghrafika. Emalj. K.: Atlant JuMS, 2004, 120. [in Ukraine]
Borodaj Oleksandr. (2013). Emalj. Aljbom-katalogh. K.: Ukr. pysjmennyk, 64. [in Ukraine]
Jurkov I.M. (2015). Emaljjer. Aljbom-katalogh. Khmeljnycjkyj: FOP Meljnyk A.A.,72. [in Ukraine]
Shmaghalo R.T. (2013). Khudozhnja emalj ta juvelirstvo Ukrajiny u sviti XX – pochatku XXI st. II-j mizhn. fest. emali v Ukrajini. Katalogh. K.: Feniks. 90 – 95. [in Ukraine]
Pasichnyk L. (2013). Mystectvo khudozhnjoji emali v tvorchosti juveliriv Ukajiny kincja XX – pochatku XXI stolittja: obrazno-plastychni osoblyvosti. II-j mizhn. fest. emali v Ukrajini. Katalogh. K.: Feniks. [in Ukraine]
Lucj S.V. Suchasni emali jak zasib tvorennja khudozhnjogho obrazu v mystectvi klasychnogho juvelirnogho domu “Lobortas,” II-j mizhn. fest. emali v Ukrajini. Katalogh. K.: Feniks, 2013, 83 – 85. [in Ukraine]
Lucj S.V. (2017).Tvorchistj mytciv KJuD «Lobortas» u konteksti ukrajinsjkogho juvelirnogho mystectva kincja XX – pochatku XXI stolittja. Dys. na zdob. nauk. stup. kand. myst. za spec. 17.00.06 (dekoratyvne mystectvo). Ljviv: Ljvivsjka nacionaljna akademija mystectv. [in Ukraine]
Lucj S. V. (2019). Juvelirne mystectvo Ukrajiny na zlami XX – XXI st.: ghenezys postupu. Demiurgh: ideji, tekhnologhiji, perspektyvy dyzajnu. Tom 2. # 1. [in Ukraine]
Kravchenko M. Ja. (2017). Mystectvo prykras v Ukrajini ostannjoji tretyny XX – pochatku XXI stolittja: jevropejsjkyj kontekst, khudozhni osoblyvosti, personaliji. Dys. na zdob. nauk. stup. kand. mystectvoznavstva za specialjnistju 17.00.06 – dekoratyvne i prykladne mystectvo. Ljviv: Ljvivsjka nacionaljna akademija mystectv. [in Ukraine]
Barbalat O. (2019). Mystectvo narodzhene voghnem: starovynna tekhnika gharjachoji emali na terenakh suchasnoji Ukrajiny. Kuljturni ta mystecjki studiji XXI stolittja: naukovo-praktychne partnerstvo: materialy mizhnarodnogho sympoziumu, 6 chervnja. 2019 r. M-vo kuljt. Ukrajiny; Nac. akad. ker. kadriv kuljt. i mystec. Kyjiv: NAKKKiM. C. 121-123. [in Ukraine]
Shmaghalo R.T. (2015). Encyklopedija khudozhnjogho metalu. T.1. Svitovyj ta ukrajinsjkyj khudozhnij metal. Klasyfikacija, terminologhija, stylistyka, ekspertyza. Ljviv: LNAM. 420 s., 1780 il.; Shmaghalo R.T. Encyklopedija khudozhnjogho metalu. T.2. Khudozhnij metal Ukrajiny XX – poch. XXI st. Ljviv: Apriori. 276 s., 668 il. [in Ukraine]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Oleg Naumov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
