Diversity of soils, vegetation and biotopes of the regional landscape park “Balka Kobylna”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2020.198226

Keywords:

soils, plant communities, biotopes, diversity, regional landscape park, spatial differentiation

Abstract

The article considers the patterns of spatial organization of vegetation and soil cover and the biotopic diversity of the regional landscape park, the territory of which has recently become part of the Emerald Network.

The aim of the study is to find out the current state of the diversity of soils, plant communities and biotopes of the territory of the regional landscape park “Balka Kobylna”.

Materials and methods. When conducting the geobotanical work, generally accepted methods were used. The soil diagnostics was carried out using soil genetic, morphological and laboratory experimental methods. Biotopes are identified in accordance with the developments, presented in the National Habitat Catalogue of Ukraine; the lower levels of the biotopic hierarchy correspond to the syntaxa of the latest “Prodrome of the vegetation of Ukraine”.

Results. The composition of the typological units of the soil cover and the features of their spatial differentiation were ascertained, the diversity of plant communities was evaluated, and the patterns of the mutual arrangement of soil and plant territorial units were revealed. It was shown, that the communities of the true steppes are confined to southern chernozems with different degrees of development; on sod-steppe soils, the vegetation of the true steppes is replaced by petrophytogenic one. A classification scheme of biotopes of the territory of the RLP was compiled, represented by six types of the highest classification units; lower levels of the biotopic hierarchy represent the syntaxonomical division of vegetation.

Conclusions. As a result of studying the soil cover of RLP “Balka Kobylna”, 23 soil varieties, included in eight soil types, were identified. 30 formations and 8 cenostructures of communities with the dominance of a certain species that did not receive the status of formations in the dominant classification were identified. In addition to the six natural types, we noted some synanthropic phytocoenoses in RLP. The typological scheme of biotopes of RLP “Balka Kobylna”, compiled on the basis of the “National Habitat Catalogue of Ukraine”, includes 6 types of the highest hierarchical level, 8 units of biotopes of the second level, 11 – of the third one, 6 – of the fourth one (including three more subtypes). The results of the studies indicate the high sozological value of the investigated territory and are the basis for the management activity on the lands of the protected object and the development of measures for the biodiversity restoration

Author Biographies

Olha Krasova, Kryviy Rih Botanical Garden of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Marshaka str., 50, Kryvyi Rig, Ukraine, 50089

PhD

Department of Optimization of Technogenic Landscapes

Oleksandr Dolyna, Kryvyi Rih National University, 11, Vitaliia Matusevycha str., Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, 50027

PhD

Department of Ecology

Oleksiy Smetana, Agrargenossenschaft Kirchheilingen e.G. Gutenbergstraße, 26, Bad Langensalza, Germany, 99947

PhD

Liudmyla Lysohor, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University Gagarin av., 54, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, 50086

PhD

Department of primary education

References

  1. Pryrodno-zapovidnyi fond Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti (2017). Dnipro, 118.
  2. Kravchenko, O. (Ed.) (2017). Pravovyi rezhym pryrodno-zapovidnoho fondu Ukrainy: istoriia formuvannia, yurydychni aspekty ta zakordonnyi dosvid. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo «Kompaniia “Manuskrypt”», 92.
  3. Smetana, O. M., Dolina, O. O., Yaroshchuk, Y. V., Krasova, O. O., Rudiuk D. O. (2013). Development of the Ingulets Regional ecocorridor: problems and perspectives. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 70 (4), 457–466.
  4. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. (1979). Bern.
  5. Polianska, K. V., Borysenko, K. A., Pavlachyk, P., Vasyliuk, O. V., Marushchak, O. Yu., Shyriaieva, D. V. et. al.; Kuzemko, A. (Ed.) (2017). Zaluchennia hromadskosti ta naukovtsiv do proektuvannia merezhi Emerald (Smarahdovoi merezhi) v Ukraini. Kyiv, 304.
  6. Updated list of officially adopted Emerald sites (2019). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/updated-list-of-officially-adopted-emerald-sites-december-2019-/168098ef51?fbclid=IwAR3Sfh-F_w0fpHBkCggkU1Xc1bUbo57vMgDhu1Fcgq-gFvM5QaceWsnOlt4
  7. Evans, D. (2012). Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation, 1, 11–26. doi: http://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.1.1808
  8. Fredshavn, J., Bak, J. (2018). Scientific analysis on the designation of Natura 2000 sites and the status of nature and effort. A comparison of The Netherlands, Schleswig-Holstein and Denmark. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, 15.
  9. Niedziałkowski, K., Blicharska, M., Mikusiński, G., Jędrzejewska, B. (2014). Why is it difficult to enlarge a protected area? Ecosystem services perspective on the conflict around the extension of the Białowieża National Park in Poland. Land Use Policy, 38, 314–329. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.002
  10. Wojdan, D., Żeber-Dzikowska, I., Gworek, B., Mickiewicz, K., Chmielewski, J. (2019). Protected areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship. Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, 30 (3 (81)), 35–46.
  11. Perzanowska, J., Korzeniak, J., Chmura, D. (2019). Alien species as a potential threat for Natura 2000 habitats: a national survey. PeerJ, 7, e8032. doi: http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8032
  12. Manolache, S., Ciocanea, C. M., Rozylowicz, L., Nita, A. (2017). Natura 2000 in Romania – a decade of governance challenges. European Journal of Geography, 8 (2), 24–34.
  13. Manolache, S., Nita, A., Ciocanea, C. M., Popescu, V. D., Rozylowicz, L. (2018). Power, influence and structure in Natura 2000 governance networks. A comparative analysis of two protected areas in Romania. Journal of Environmental Management, 212, 54–64. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.076
  14. Feilhauer, H., Dahlke, C., Doktor, D., Lausch, A., Schmidtlein, S., Schulz, G., Stenzel, S. (2014). Mapping the local variability of Natura 2000 habitats with remote sensing. Applied Vegetation Science, 17 (4), 765–779. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12115
  15. Hošek, M., Kešner, M., Bogdan V., Lakušić D., Kuzmanović N., Lazarević P. et. al. (2019). Natura 2000 habitat mapping of the Skadar Lake National Park in Montenegro. Technical report, 15.
  16. Abduloieva, O. S., Kovalenko, O. A. (2017). Metodychni aspekty kartuvannia oselyshch v Natsionalnomu pryrodnomu parku «Pyriatynskyi» (Poltavska obl.). Merezha NATURA 2000 yak innovatsiina systema okhorony ridkisnykh vydiv ta oselyshch v Ukraini. Conservation Biologyin Ukraine. Kyiv, 1, 9–14.
  17. Yakubenko, B. Ye., Popovych, S. Yu., Ustymenko, P. M., Dubyna, D. V., Churilov, A. M. (2018). Heobotanika: metodychni aspekty doslidzhen. Kyiv: Lira K, 316.
  18. Polovyi, A. M., Hutsal, A. I., Dronova, O. O. (2013). Gruntoznavstvo. Odesa, 668.
  19. Dolyna, O. O., Smetana, O. M. (2014). Terytorialna struktura ta klasyfikatsiia gruntiv Kryvorizkoho zalizorudnoho baseinu. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu. Seriia: Biolohiia. Ekolohiia, 22 (2), 161–168.
  20. Mosyakin S., Fedoronchuk M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine. A nomenclatural checklist. Kiev, 346.
  21. Krasova, O. O., Korshykov, I. I. (2016). Community dominants and coenotaxonomic richness of vegetation on slopes of the Black Sea part of the Ingulets River basin. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 73 (6), 557–567. doi: http://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj73.06.557
  22. Kuzemko, A. A., Didukh, Ya. P., Onyshchenko, V. A., Sheffer, Ya. (Eds.) (2018). Natsionalnyi kataloh biotopiv Ukrainy. Kyiv: FOP Klymenko Yu.Ya., 442.
  23. Dubyna, D. V., Dziuba, T. P., Yemelianova, S. M. ta in. (2019). Prodromus roslynnosti Ukrainy. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 783.
  24. Didukh, Ya. P. (Ed.) (2009). Chervona knyha Ukrainy. Roslynnyi svit. Kyiv: Hlobalkonsaltynh, 912.
  25. Didukh, Ya. P. (Ed.) (2009). Zelena knyha Ukrainy. Ridkisni i taki, shcho perebuvaiut pid zahrozoiu znyknennia ta typovi pryrodni roslynni uhrupovannia, yaki pidliahaiut okhoroni. Kyiv: Alterpres, 448.
  26. Kucherevskyi, V. V., Provozhenko, T. A. (2012). Shamaecytiseta granitici– nova formatsiia chaharnykovoi roslynnosti Pravoberezhnoho Zlakovoho Stepu Ukrainy. Ukrainskyi botanichnyi zhurnal, 69 (5), 644–651.
  27. Revised Annex I of Resolution 4 (1996) of the Bern Convention on endangered natural habitats types using the EUNIS habitat classification (year of revision 2010). Available at: http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/references/2442
  28. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, O.J. L206, 22.07.92

Published

2020-02-28

How to Cite

Krasova, O., Dolyna, O., Smetana, O., & Lysohor, L. (2020). Diversity of soils, vegetation and biotopes of the regional landscape park “Balka Kobylna”. ScienceRise: Biological Science, (1 (22), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2020.198226

Issue

Section

Biological Sciences