Effects of E-genes and photoperiod duration on assimilation processes in isogenic lines of soybean

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2021.229512

Keywords:

soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), isogenic lines, E-genes, photoperiod, assimilation indices, growth, development

Abstract

The aim of the research. To reveal the patterns of genetic control of assimilation processes in isogenic by E-genes lines of soybean conditions of different photoperiod duration.

Materials and methods. The plant material – 5 isolines of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Cv. Clark: short-day (SD) lines (genotypes E1E2E3, E1e2e3) and neutral-day (ND) lines (genotypes e1E2e3, e1e2E3, e1e2e3). From the third true leaf stage, one part of the plants was grown on a natural day (16 hours), and the other was exposed to a short day (9 hours). On the day of the start of the experiment, after 7 and 14 days, the dry weight of leaves and stems, the number and area of leaves were measured, based on which assimilation indices were calculated – RGR, NAR, LAR, SLA, LWR.

Results. During the studied ontogenetic period (two weeks) in all isolines, regardless of the genotype by E-genes and the duration of the photoperiod, the assimilation processes increased. The RGR and NAR under the short day decreased in the first week and then increased in the second week of the experiment. The degree of change in the indices varied depending on the isoline genotype by E-genes. The LAR and LWR were lower under the short day in SD lines. These indices were the same in the ND lines under short and long day. Under the short photoperiod the SLA in SD lines was higher, and in ND lines it was practically the same for both photoperiods.

Conclusions. The assimilation processes in the studied isogenic lines during the experience (two weeks) increase, but less intensively under short-day conditions. The studied lines, differed in the nature and intensity of assimilation processes, depending on the genotype by E-genes. Assimilation processes in the studied soybean lines are probably determined by the interaction of E-genes and the duration of the photoperiod, which is one of the important conditions for the adaptation of soybean to the environmental factors

Author Biographies

Yulia Yukhno, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Senior Lecturer

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Plants and Microorganisms

Vasyl Zhmurko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Plants and Microorganisms

References

  1. Vishnyakova, M. A., Seferova, I. V., Samsonova, M. G. (2017). Genetic sources required for soybean breeding in the context of new biotechnologies (review). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya, 52 (5), 905–916. doi: http://doi.org/10.15389/agrobiology.2017.5.905eng
  2. World Agricultural Production (2020). United States Department of Agriculture. Circular Series. USDA, Foraing Agr. Servise. Available at: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf
  3. Zhmurko, V. V., Avksentieva, O. O., Yukhno, Yu. Yu., Popova, Yu. V., Samoilov, A. M. Tymoshenko, V. F. et. al. (2017). Efekty heniv fotoperiodychnoi chutlyvosti i potreby v yarovyzatsii u roslyn pshenytsi miakoi ta soi kulturnoi. Fiziolohiia roslyn: dosiahnennia ta novi napriamy rozvytku. Kyiv: Lohos, 187–197.
  4. Kyryzyi, D. A. (2004). Fotosyntez y rost rastenyi v aspekte donorno-aktseptornikh otnoshenyi. Kyiv: Lohos, 192.
  5. Zhmurko, V. V. (2009). Fizioloho-biokhimichni aspekty fotoperiodychnoho i yarovyzatsiinoho kontroliu rozvytku roslyn. Kyiv, 43.
  6. Andrés, F., Coupland, G. (2012). The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 627–639. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3291
  7. Davydenko, O. H., Zhmurko V. V., Holoienko, D. V., Rozentsveih, V. E, Shablinska, O. V. (2004). Proiav fotoperiodychnoi reaktsii u rannostyhlykh sortiv soi. Selektsiia i nasinnytstvo, 88, 151–162.
  8. Jiang, B., Nan, H., Gao, Y., Tang, L., Yue, Y., Lu, S. et. al. (2014). Allelic Combinations of Soybean Maturity Loci E1, E2, E3 and E4 Result in Diversity of Maturity and Adaptation to Different Latitudes. PLoS ONE, 9 (8), e106042. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106042
  9. Jung, C. H., Wong, C. E., Singh, M. B., Bhalla, P. L. (2012). Comparative genomic analysis of soybean flowering genes. PLoS One, 7 (6), e38250. Available at: doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038250
  10. Meekins, J. F., McCarthy, B. C. (2000). Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. Journal of Ecology, 88, 447–463. doi: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00461.x
  11. Dasti, A. A., Fatima, K., Malik, S. A. (2002). How photoperiod affects growth rate and biomass allocation pattern: a comparative study on three genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 1 (2), 176–179. doi: http://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.176.179
  12. Wang, Y., Wu, C-X., Zhang, X-M., Wang, Y-P., Han, T-F. (2008). Effects of Soybean Major Maturity Genes Under Different Photoperiods. Acta agronomica sinica, 34 (7), 1160−1168. doi: http://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1006.2008.01160
  13. Han, T. F., Wang, J. L. (1995). Studies on the post-flowering photoperiodic responses in soybean. Acta Botanica Sinica, 37, 863–869.
  14. Zhang, G., Du, W. (1999). The effects of daylength on the growth of soybean and the creation of wide-adaptation germplasm. Soybean Genetics Newsletter, 26. Available at: https://www.soybase.org/sgn/article.php?issue_id=2&autoID=15
  15. El-Darier, S., Hemada, M., Sadek, L. (2002). Dry Matter Distribution and Growth Analysis in Soybeans under Natural Agricultural Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5 (5), 545–549. doi: http://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.545.549
  16. Zhang, G. R. (1997). Photoperiod effects on growth and development periods and agronomic characteristics in soybean. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 19, 37–41.
  17. Price, W. B. (2012). Understanding the Mechanisms of the Photoperiod Flowering Pathway in Soybean. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 94.
  18. Yuhno, Yu. Yu., Zhmurko, V. V. (2010). The rates of development and the growth processes of soybean isogenic EElines under different day-length conditions. The Journal of V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: biology, 905 (11), 217–223.
  19. Poorter, H. (2002). Plant growth and carbon economy. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0003200
  20. Sirtautas, R., Samuolienė, G., Brazaitytė, A., Duchovskis, P. (2011). Temperature and photoperiod effects on photosynthetic indices of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Zemdirbyste-Agric., 98, 57–62.
  21. Hunt, R., Causton, D. R., Shipley, B. Askew, A. P. (2002). A modern tool for classical plant growth analysis. Annals of Botany, 90, 485–488. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf214
  22. Poorter, H., Anten, N. P. R., Marcelis, L. F. M. (2013). Physiological mechanisms in plant growth models: do we need a supra-cellular systems biology approach? Plant, Cell & Environment, 36 (9), 1673–1690. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12123
  23. Koning, H., Lambers, H., Cambridge, M. L., Pons, T. L. (1989). Physiological and Morphological Differences Between Plants With High NAR or a High LAR as Related to Environmental Conditions. Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of Higher Plants. Academic Publishing, The Hague, 101–123.
  24. Poorter, H., van Rijn, C. P. E., Vanhala, T. K., Verhoeven, K. J. F., de Jong, Y. E. M., Stam, P., Lambers, H. (2004). A genetic analysis of relative growth rate and underlying components in Hordeum spontaneum. Oecologia, 142 (3), 360–377. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1705-1
  25. Anten, N. P. R., Hirose, T. (1999). Inter-specific differences in above ground growth patterns results in spatial and temporal partitioning of light among species in tall-grass meadow. Journal of Ecology, 87 (4), 583–597. doi: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00365.x
  26. Caliskan, O., Odabas, M. S., Cİrak, C., Radušienė, J., Odabas, F. (2010). The quantitative effect of temperature and light intensity at growth in Origanum onites L. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 4 (7), 551–558.
  27. Bunce, J. A., Heichel, G. H. (1986). Measurements and modeling of photosynthesis in field crops. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 4 (1), 47–77. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/07352688609382218

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Yukhno, Y., & Zhmurko, V. (2021). Effects of E-genes and photoperiod duration on assimilation processes in isogenic lines of soybean . ScienceRise: Biological Science, (1(26), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2021.229512

Issue

No. 1(26) (2021)

Section

Biological Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Юлия Юрьевна Юхно, Василий Васильевич Жмурко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.