Floristic richness and taxonomic analysis of the flora of the national park "biloberezhzhya svyatoslava"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2017.99760Keywords:
floristic richness, β-diversity, systematic structure, floristic proportions, aboriginal and adventive fractionsAbstract
The aim of the work was to study the floristic richness and systematic structure of the National park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava”. The following tasks were set for attaining this aim: to carry out inventorying of the specific composition of flora of the National park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava”; to assess β-diversity and richness of flora the National park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava”; to reveal the features of its flora by systematic analysis; to compare the allochtonic and autochtonal factions of flora of the National natural park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava”.
Methods: The material was the list of varieties of the plants of flora of NNP “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava”, revealed at detail-route studies. The cameral methods were used – processing of herbarium samples, and also the methods of mathematical statistics. The taxon names were given according to Mosyakin S.L & Fedoronchuk M. M.
Results. It was revealed that floristic list of flora of the National natural park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava” consists of 595 varieties from 318 genera, 83 families and 4 divisions of vascular plants.
The studied flora is characterized by most specific richness among the low Dnipro arenas by the level of floristic richness. It is conditioned by geological youth of arena, most diverse soil-hydrological conditions and correspondingly the different types of vegetable covering, unessential anthropogenic influence and most β-diversity.
Autochtonal element of the flora includes 479 varieties from 227 genera, 50 families. Adventive fraction includes 116 varieties from 91 genera, 33 families. Aginosperms play the most important role in flora of the National natural park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava” (98,8%), vascular sporophytes and gymnospermous plants are only 1,2% of the general number of varieties. The floristic proportions are: (variety/genus) – 1 (variety/genus) – 3,8 (variety/genus.) – 7,2. Only 19 families of 83 ones of flora of the national park have the high level of specific diversity (7,2), one family has the middle level of specific diversity. 75 % of all flora varieties are concentrated in them. In generic spectrum prevail the monotype genera that are more than a half of the general number of flora varieties, namely 62,9 %, that is caused by the fact that the large number of endemic genera are monotype, and there are many endemic varieties in the composition of studied flora. There are 200 (62,9%) genera, which specific richness level is low(1,9). Other 118 genera, which specific richness level is high, include 37,2%. Flora is characterized with significant specific and generic richness and equally tends to both floras of Ancient Mediterranean and to Boreal ones, at that there is observed the strengthening of systematic structure as a result of anthropogenic influence.
Conclusion: For today the studied flora of the National natural park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava” is at the stage of formation at the expanse of invasion of adventives varieties, caused by urbanization of the territory in last decade. However most advents have the wide ecological amplitude, there are eurytopic and indifferent to the different environmental factors.
As a result of the analysis of systematic structure of flora of the National natural park “Biloberezhzhya Svyatoslava” there was revealed, that the combination of ecotypes, different by microclimatic and phytocenotic conditions, on the studied territory mainly causes the formation of essential β-diversity and original rich specific composition on this rather small territory
References
- Umanets, O. Iu. (1997). Ekoloho-tsenotychnakharakterytyka flory pishchanykh masyviv Livoberezhzhia Nyzhnoho Dnipra ta yii henezys. Kyiv, 19.
- Onyshchenko, V. A., Andriienko, T. L. (Eds.) (2012). Fitoriznomanittia zapovidnykiv i natsionalnykh pryrodnykh parkiv Ukrainy. Natsionalni pryrodni parky. P. 2. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr, 580.
- Barbarych, A. I. (Ed.) (1977). Heobotanichne raionuvannia Ukrainskoi RSR. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 304.
- Tymoshenko, P. A. (2000). Florotsenotychni kompleksy Nyzhnodniprovskykh aren v umovakh antropohennoho vplyvu. Kyiv, 19.
- Karnatovska, M. Iu. (2006). Flora ta roslynnist Nyzhnodniprovskykh aren. Kyiv, 19.
- Klokov, M. V. (1981). Psamofylnуe florystycheskye kompleksy na terrytoryy USSR. Novosty systematyky vуsshykh y nyzshykh rastenyi za 1979 h. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 90–150.
- Umanets, O. Iu. (1999). Ystoryia yzuchenyia pryrodnoi rastytelnosty Nyzovyi Levoberezhnoho Dnepra. Ukrayinskyj fitocen. Zbirnyk. Seriya: A. Fitosociologiya, 1-2 (12-13), 210–218.
- Mosyakin, S., Fedoronchuk, M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine: a nomenclatural checklist. Kyiv: M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, 345.
- Dobrochaeva, D. N., Kotov, M. Y., Prokudyn, Yu. N. et. al. (1987). Opredelytel vуsshykh rastenyi Ukraynу. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 548.
- Bondarenko, O. (2015). Flora-lower reaches of the Dniester watershed Tiligul (Odessa region, Ukraine). Chornomorski botanical journal, 11 (3), 278–296.
- Novosad, V. V. (1992). Flora Kerchensko-Tamanskoho rehyona. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 280.
- Voronova, S. M. (2008). Florystychne bahatstvo ta systematychna struktura flory Yelanetsko-Inhulskoho rehionu. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 43, 544–551.
- Melnychuk, S. S. (2006). Flora Matviivskoho pishchanoho masyvu. Studentskyi naukovyi visnyk Mykolaivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni V.O. Sukhomlynskoho, 1, 53–54.
- Kolomiiets, H. V. (2006). Adventyvni roslyny u merezhi pryrodookhoronnykh terytorii Mykolaivskoi oblasti. Synantropizatsiia roslynnoho pokryvu Ukrainy. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 98–100.
- Protopopova, V. V. (1991). Synantropnaia flora Ukraynу y puty ee razvytyia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 204.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Ganna Trochymenko, Svetlana Melnychuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.