Improvement of the model of structural-mechanical and thixotropic properties of meat batters

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.353165

Keywords:

thixotropy, meat product, sausage products, meat batter, rheological parameters, structural and mechanical properties

Abstract

The object of research is the thixotropy of meat batters with different ingredient compositions characteristic of sausage products. The research analyzes modern approaches to evaluating the rheological properties of meat emulsion systems and summarizes the factors influencing their structural organization. The regularities of changes in viscous-plastic characteristics of pork and turkey batters under different levels of load are investigated, and the features of structural destruction and recovery are established.

A comprehensive assessment of thixotropic properties is based on the analysis of the structural-mechanical characteristics of batter systems during their formation with various ingredients. It has been demonstrated that the thixotropic state depends on the concentration of protein components and the degree of hydration of the protein system, which determines the stability of the sausage matrix during mechanical processing. The shear stress was calculated for time intervals in the range of 11000 s. The output parameters of the proposed model were adapted to the properties of soft meat batters: for minced pork, coefficients A = 80 Pa and B = 12 were adopted, and for minced turkey, A = 60 Pa and B = 9. Since the value of B is negative for both types of raw materials, this confirms the presence of pronounced thixotropic properties in the studied systems. Controlling these parameters allows regulation of the thixotropy of the batter to achieve optimal consistency and structural stability of the finished product.

Thixotropic properties play a crucial role in technological operations, including grinding, mixing, filling casings, and structure formation during thermal processing. Excessive structural stability complicates processing, while excessive thixotropy reduces the shape retention of products. The determination of rheological parameters allows predicting the behavior of batter systems under production conditions, ensuring stable texture and high product quality. The results obtained have practical value for optimizing technological regimes in sausage production and developing new products with predictable rheological properties.

Author Biographies

Ihor Oshchypok, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Hotel and Restaurant Business and Food Technologies

Halyna Kushniruk, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Hotel and Restaurant Business and Food Technologies

Olia Masliichuk, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Hotel and Restaurant Business and Food Technologies

Olga Vivcharuk, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Hotel and Restaurant Business and Food Technologies

Oksana Pauk , Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Hotel and Restaurant Business and Food Technologies

References

  1. Warren, S. E., Bowker, B., Mohan, A. (2020). Physicochemical properties of beef Tongue as a value-added meat product. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103433
  2. Köppel, R., Ganeshan, A., Weber, S., Pietsch, K., Graf, C., Hochegger, R. et al. (2019). Duplex digital PCR for the determination of meat proportions of sausages containing meat from chicken, turkey, horse, cow, pig and sheep. European Food Research and Technology, 245 (4), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-3220-3
  3. Harastani, R., James, L. J., Walton, J., Woolley, E. (2020). Tackling obesity: A knowledge-base to enable industrial food reformulation. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102433
  4. Carvalho-Ferreira, J. P. de, da Cunha, D. T., Finlayson, G., Caldas, G., Jamar, G., Bandoni, D. H. et al. (2020). Differential impact of consuming foods perceived to be high or low in fat on subsequent food reward. Food Quality and Preference, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103977
  5. Rather, S. A., Masoodi, F. A., Rather, J. A., Gani, A., Wani, S. M., Ganaie, T. A., Akhter, R. (2021). Impact of thermal processing and storage on fatty acid composition and cholesterol oxidation of canned traditional low-fat meat product of India. LWT, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110503
  6. Baune, M.-C., Schroeder, S., Witte, F., Heinz, V., Bindrich, U., Weiss, J., Terjung, N. (2021). Analysis of protein-network formation of different vegetable proteins during emulsification to produce solid fat substitutes. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 15 (3), 2399–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00767-9
  7. Boukid, F. (2021). Plant-based meat analogues: from niche to mainstream. European Food Research and Technology, 247 (2), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03630-9
  8. He, J., Evans, N. M., Liu, H., Shao, S. (2020). A review of research on plant‐based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 19 (5), 2639–2656. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12610
  9. Berger, L. M., Gibis, M., Witte, F., Terjung, N., Weiss, J. (2022). Influence of meat batter addition in ground beef on structural properties and quality parameters. European Food Research and Technology, 248 (10), 2509–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04065-0
  10. Witte, F., Smetana, S., Heinz, V., Terjung, N. (2020). High-pressure processing of usually discarded dry aged beef trimmings for subsequent processing. Meat Science, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108241
  11. Nortjé, G. L., Nel, L., Jordaan, E., Naudé, R. T., Holzapfel, W. H., Grimbeek, R. J. (1989). A microbiological survey of fresh meat in the supermarket trade. Part 2: beef retail cuts. Meat Science, 25 (2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(89)90025-9
  12. Zerabruk, K., Retta, N., Muleta, D., Tefera, A. T. (2019). Assessment of Microbiological Safety and Quality of Minced Meat and Meat Contact Surfaces in Selected Butcher Shops of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Food Quality. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3902690
  13. Terjung, N., Witte, F., Heinz, V. (2021). The dry aged beef paradox: Why dry aging is sometimes not better than wet aging. Meat Science, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108355
  14. Berger, L. M., Witte, F., Terjung, N., Weiss, J., Gibis, M. (2022). Influence of Processing Steps on Structural, Functional, and Quality Properties of Beef Hamburgers. Applied Sciences, 12 (15), 7377. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157377
  15. Davey, C. L., Gilbert, K. V. (1974). Temperature‐dependent cooking toughness in beef. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 25 (8), 931–938. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740250808
  16. Herrero, A. M., Carmona, P., López-López, I., Jiménez-Colmenero, F. (2008). Raman Spectroscopic Evaluation of Meat Batter Structural Changes Induced by Thermal Treatment and Salt Addition. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56 (16), 7119–7124. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf800925s
  17. Tornberg, E. (2005). Effects of heat on meat proteins – Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Science, 70 (3), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.021
  18. Beneke, B. (2018). Technology alters muscle structure: Histological identification and evaluation of meat and meat products. Fleischwirtschaft, 2, 62–68.
  19. Foegeding, E. A. (1988). Gelation in meat batters. Reciprocal Meat Conference Proceedings, Vol. 41. Laramie, 44–47.
  20. Honikel, K. O., Hamm, R.; Pearson, A. M., Dutson, T. R. (Eds.) (1994). Measurement of water-holding capacity and juiciness. Quality Attributes and Their Measurement in Meat, Poultry and Fish Products. Boston: Springer, 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2167-9_5
  21. Knipe, C. L.; Dikemann, M. (Ed.) (2024). Sausages, types of: Emulsion. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85125-1.00160-5
  22. Tyszkiewicz, I., Kłossowska, B. M., Wieczorek, U., Jakubiec‐Puka, A. (1997). Mechanical Tenderisation of Pork Meat: Protein and Water Release due to Tissue Damage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 73 (2), 179–185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199702)73:2<179::aid-jsfa699>3.0.co;2-#
  23. Raudsepp, P., Brüggemann, D. A., Henckel, P., Vyberg, M., Groves, K., Oksbjerg, N., Therkildsen, M. (2017). Performance of conventional histochemical methods relative to a novel immunolabeling technique in assessing degree of degradation in comminuted chicken meat. Food Control, 73, 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.07.036
  24. Irmscher, S. B., Böjthe, Z., Herrmann, K., Gibis, M., Kohlus, R., Weiss, J. (2013). Influence of filling conditions on product quality and machine parameters in fermented coarse meat emulsions produced by high shear grinding and vacuum filling. Journal of Food Engineering, 117 (3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.03.015
  25. Leseigneur-Meynier, A., Gandemer, G. (1991). Lipid composition of pork muscle in relation to the metabolic type of the fibres. Meat Science, 29 (3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(91)90052-r
  26. Melro, E., Antunes, F., Cruz, I., Ramos, P. E., Carvalho, F., Alves, L. (2020). Morphological, textural and physico-chemical characterization of processed meat products during their shelf life. Food Structure, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foostr.2020.100164
  27. Hamm, R. (1975). On the rheology of minced meat. Journal of Texture Studies, 6 (3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1975.tb01126.x
  28. Irmscher, S. B., Gibis, M., Herrmann, K., Kohlus, R., Weiss, J. (2016). Development of a novel homogenizer using the vane pump-grinder technology for the production of meat batter. Journal of Food Engineering, 169, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.08.022
  29. Krökki, A. S. (1995). Fat Concentration in Commercial Minced Meat. Lipid / Fett, 97 (12), 466–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.2700971210
  30. Cao, C., Xu, Y., Kong, B., Xia, X., Chen, Q., Zhang, H., Liu, Q. (2023). Changes of rheological behavior, thermal and microstructural properties of myofibrillar protein-κ-carrageenan mixed sol as mediated by NaCl concentration. Food Bioscience, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.103035
  31. Momcilova, M. M., Gardinarska-Ivanova, D. N., Yordanov, D. G., Zsivanovits, G. I. (2023). Microstructure and technological properties of cooked meat sausages prepared with emulsions of vegetable oils as substitutes for animal fat. Food Research, 7 (4), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.7(4).1030
  32. de Huidobro, F. R., Miguel, E., Blázquez, B., Onega, E. (2005). A comparison between two methods (Warner–Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Science, 69 (3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.008
  33. Dzudie, T., Scher, J., Hardy, J., Sanchez, C. (2000). Physico‐chemical and rheological properties of low‐fat, high‐added water beef sausage extended with common bean flour. Journal of Muscle Foods, 11 (2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2000.tb00420.x
  34. Profeta, A., Baune, M.-C., Smetana, S., Bornkessel, S., Broucke, K., Van Royen, G., Enneking, U., Weiss, J., Heinz, V., Hieke, S., Terjung, N. (2021). Preferences of German Consumers for Meat Products Blended with Plant-Based Proteins. Sustainability, 13 (2), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020650
Improvement of the model of structural-mechanical and thixotropic properties of meat batters

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Oshchypok, I., Kushniruk, H., Masliichuk, O. ., Vivcharuk, O. ., & Pauk , O. (2026). Improvement of the model of structural-mechanical and thixotropic properties of meat batters. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(3(87), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2026.353165

Issue

Section

Food Production Technology