Submissions

Submission Preparation Checklist

• Article size – up to 12 pages including the list of references.
  Article formatting:
  UDC for articles
  JEL Classification
  • A4 format, margins top, bottom, right, left – 2 cm, font Times New Roman 14, line spacing 1.5;
  • The title of the paper (in uppercase, bold font) aligned center in Ukrainian;
  • Author's ORCID ID (optional for students);
  • Scopus ID / WoS (if available)
  on the left side of the page, author information is provided in Ukrainian and English:
  • last name, first name and patronymic of the author (bold font) in Ukrainian (in full); position with the name of the department where the author works, academic degree, academic title, name of the institution where the author works or studies, city, country, email, phone number (will not be published in the collection);
  • author's first name and last name (bold font) in English; position with the name of the department where the author works, academic degree, academic title, name of the institution where the author works or studies, city, country;
  
  • abstract in Ukrainian - full name in Ukrainian, title of the article, (abstract size 180 - 200 words) should include the research object, the problem addressed, the essence of the results obtained, and the scientific significance of the work;
  • keywords in Ukrainian, separated by (;)
  • abstract in English similar to the abstract in Ukrainian.
  • keywords in English, separated by (;)
  The content of the article should contain the following sections (highlighted in bold throughout the text):
  
  Statement of the problem and its connection with scientific or practical tasks;
  Analysis of recent research and publications cited by the author with references;
  Identification of unresolved parts of the general problem addressed in the article;
  Formation of the article's goals (task setting);
  Presentation of the main research material (with justification of the scientific results obtained);
  Conclusions of this study and prospects for further work in this direction.
  The list of references (without duplicates) is formatted according to the appropriate standards and duplicated as References at the end of the text by citation number in the text.
  Important! The organizing committee reserves the right to edit or reject articles that are executed and formatted in violation of the requirements established by the editorial board. After receiving the relevant materials by the editorial board and their initial verification, a confirmation of inclusion of the abstracts in the collection will be sent to your email.
  The editorial board verifies all articles for compliance with academic integrity.
  The article review process is a crucial part of academic and scientific activity. Here are the main stages of this process:
  Article Submission:
  Authors submit their work to a scientific journal.
  Compliance Check with Journal Requirements:
  The journal's editorial team checks if the article meets the formal requirements (format, length, structure). At this stage, the article may be rejected without review if it does not meet the journal's requirements.
  Initial Assessment by the Editor:
  The deputy editor or editorial board assesses the overall quality and relevance of the article. If the article fits the topic and quality level, it is sent for review.
  Selection of Reviewers:
  The deputy editor selects independent experts in the relevant field to review the article. Usually, 1-2 reviewers are chosen.
  Reviewing:
  Reviewers evaluate the article based on several criteria: novelty, significance, methodology, results, conclusions, and relevance to the literature. They write detailed reports and recommend one of the following options: accept, accept with minor changes, revise after major changes, or reject.
  Review and Editorial Decision:
  The editor analyzes the reviews and makes a decision. The decisions can be the following:
  Accept without changes.
  Accept with minor changes.
  Ask the author to make significant changes and submit the article again (reviewers may check the article again after changes).
  Reject.
  Author Notification:
  Authors receive the editorial decision along with the reviewers’ comments. If changes are needed, authors must make them and submit a revised version.
  Reviewing the Revised Version (if necessary):
  If significant changes were requested, the revised article may be sent back to the reviewers for re-evaluation.
  Acceptance and Publication:
  If the article is accepted, it is edited, typeset, and prepared for publication. Authors may receive proofs for checking before final publication.
  Post-publication Review (sometimes):
  In some cases, after the article is published, other scientists may provide their comments and criticism, which may lead to discussions or further research.
  This process ensures a high level of quality of scientific publications and upholds the standards of scientific ethics and reliability.
  Review period – 10 – 15 working days.
  Reviewers are informed that the manuscripts they receive are the intellectual property of the author.