HOMO IN VIA: FROM THE PLATO’S CAVE TO THE MODERN NEUROSCREEN

Authors

  • Victor Karpov National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts, Ukraine
  • Natalia Syrotynska Ukrainian Music at the M. Lysenko Lviv National Music Academy, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147115

Keywords:

Plato, cave allegory, Eidos, primitive culture, transgression, neuroscience, the reality of the neurоscreen.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is an interpretation of the famous Platonic myth about a cave from the perspective of the critical images rethinking in the context of their accentuation during the millennial development of the humankind culture as well as in acquiring the corresponding term for the designation of the modern style. Methodology. The choice of research strategies in identifying the features of changing key periods has determined the application of the systemic and integrated approach and contributed to the comprehension of value-based social and cultural imperatives within the historical development of humankind. The implementation of the semiotic and functional procedures is formed due to the identification of iconic connections between the symbols of the Platonic myth within the time-separated periods. The use of comparative and heuristic research methods helped to identify structural models reflecting the features of the functioning of culture at its various stages. Regarding the particular context, we use the prognostic aspect of the study, which involves understanding of new symbols that reflect social relations and cultural and artistic forms of modern information and technological civilization. The use of the mentioned methods of research contributed to obtaining their theoretical results. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the formulation and development of an actual topic, which within the scientific dimension has not received comprehensive and objective coverage and is being investigated for the first time. The research proves the idea that consists in the fact that the results of understanding of the images of the Platonic myth serve to build a new reading of the ways of development of human civilization, as well as to determine the value-based categories of the modern hyper-informational society. Conclusions. The development of the human culture demonstrates a tangible link of contemporary worldview landmarks with unique opportunities for technical innovation, which requires the introduction of new terminology. Also, it is noted that the Platonic myth of the cave arises with the appropriate marker, the polysemy of which made it possible to identify critical moments of the historical and cultural development of humankind and formulate appropriate definitions. The neuro art term is proposed which accumulates modern artistic means, reflected in a combination of unique expressive possibilities of sound, image, and text, which project a particular idea into the human subconscious with the help of various means of modern technology. Thus, a new reality of human existence arises - neuroscreens with the domination of political and economic interests, activating manipulative schemes based on eidetic means of representativeness. It is stated that the Platonic eidos discovers internal versatility, is the categorical structure of medieval and modern philosophers, correlates the artistic, historical processes of different periods, and therefore fully corresponds to the definition of contemporary style as eidetic.

Author Biographies

Victor Karpov, National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the department of Art Study Expertise

Natalia Syrotynska, Ukrainian Music at the M. Lysenko Lviv National Music Academy

Head of the department of Medieval Studies

References

Біла А. Сюрреалізм. Київ, 2010. 208 с.

Гирц К. Интерпретация культур. Москва, 2004. 560 с.

Кияновська Л. Який сьогодні стиль надворі? // Наукові діалоги з Н.О. Герасимовою-Персидською. Науковий вісник НМАУ ім. П.Чайковського. Вип. 19. Київ: НМАУ ім. П.Чайковського, 2017. С. 65 - 91.

Куценков П. Психология первобытного и традиционного искусства. Москва, 2007. 232 с.

Леви-Строс К. Первобытное мышление / Пер., вступ. ст. и прим. А. Б. Островского. Москва, 1994. 384 с.

Лєпахін В. Ікона та іконічність. Львів, 2001. 288 с.

Личковах В. Дивосад культури: Вибрані статті з естетики, культурології, філософії мистецтва. Чернігів, 2006. 160 с.

Ницше Ф. Вагнер в Байрейте. Странник и его тень. Избранные произведения в 3 томах. Т. 2. Москва, 1994.

Платон. Держави. Книга VII. Київ, 2000. С. 209 - 239.

Прокопенко В. Платонівський міф про печеру й дискусії навколо нього // Versus. Харків, 2014. № 2. С. 28 - 32.

Рамачандран В. Мозг рассказывает: Что делает нас людьми / Пер. с англ. Чепель Елена. Москва, 2015. 422 с.

Творения преподобного Иоанна Дамаскина. Христологические и полемические трактаты. Слова на богородичные праздники / пер., комент. о. Максим Козлов, Д. Афиногенова. Москва, 1997. 349 с.

Тукова І. Розвиток музичного мистецтва ХХ століття у співвідношенні з неклаcичною науковою пара-дигмою // Мистецтвознавчі записки. Київ, 2013. Вип. 24. С. 241 - 248.

Эйдос. Словарь. Психология. URL: http://galactic.org.ua/clovo/p-e9.htm

Эпштейн М. Искусство авангарда и религиозное сознание // Новый мир. Москва, 1989. №12. С. 224 - 235.

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. Cвітоглядні та мистецькі паралелі середньовіччя і сучасності // Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтва: наук. журнал. Київ: Міленіум, 2018. № 2. С. 18 - 25.

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. Neuroаrt in the context of creativitу // Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтва: наук. журнал. Київ: Міленіум, 2018. № 1. С. 21 – 36.

Bila А. (2010). Siurrealizm. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Hirz К. (2004). Interpretation of cultures. Moscow [in Russian].

Kyianovska L (2017). What is the style of the day? / Naukovyi visnyk Nacionalnoi muzychnoi akademii im. P. Chaikovskoho, vyp. 19. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kucenkov P. (2007). Psychology of primitive and traditional art. Moscow [in Russian].

Levi-Stross K. (1994). Primitive thinking. Moscow [in Russian].

Liepahin V. (2001). Icon and Iconicity. Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Lychkovah V. (2006). Miracle Garden of Culture: Selected articles on aesthetics, culturology, philosophy of art. Chernihiv [in Ukrainian].

Nitsshe F. (1994). Wagner in Bayreuth. Wanderer and his shadow. Selected Works, t. 2. Moscow [in Rus-sian].

Platon. (2000). The State, kn. VII. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Prokopenko V. (2014). Plato's myth about the cave and discussions around him / Versus, vyp. 2, 28-32. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Ramachandran V. (2015). Brain recounts: What makes us human. Moscow [ in Russian].

Monk John of Damascus. (1997). Christological and polemical treatises. Words for the Holy Virgin holidays . Moscow [ in Russian].

Tukova I. (2013). Development of musical art of the twentieth century in relation to non-classical scientific paradigm / Mystectvoznavchi zapysky, vyp. 24, 241 – 248. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Eidos. Psychology. URL: http://galactic.org.ua/clovo/p-e9.htm

Epshtein M. (1989). Avant-garde art and religious consciousness // Novyi mir, vyp. 12, 224 – 235. Moscow [ in Russian].

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. Medieval and contemporaneity world-visual and art parallels // Bulletin of the Na-tional Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts, 2, 177 – 182. Kyiv [in English].

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. Neuroаrt in the context of creativitу // Bulletin of the National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts, 1, 21 – 36. Kyiv [in English].

Downloads

Published

2018-08-29

Issue

Section

Культурологія