DIALOGUE OF CULTURES: E. HALL AND F. KLUCKHOHN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147319Keywords:
culture, communication, intercultural communication, intercultural dialogue, E. Hall, high-context and low-context cultures, monochronic and polychronic cultures, F. Kluckhohn and F. Strodtbeck’s value orientations theory.Abstract
The purpose of the study. This paper aims at highlighting some of the main approaches to intercultural dialogue – E. Hall’s cultural factors and F. Kluckhohn and F. Strodtbeck’s value orientations theory. Methodology. The authors have used anthropological integrative approach, comparative analysis, and philosophical hermeneutics. The scientific novelty. Cultural patterns are largely determined by different reality tunnels: everyone creates his/her own unique reality, which is recognized as the only one “true reality”. This makes communication more complicated. Nowadays, global awareness and understanding of other cultures help people to cope with the “difficulties of cultural translation”. To avoid the threats to effective intercultural communication, we must recognize that Other doesn’t mean Wrong, Other is just Different. It helps to understand the cultural logics behind cultural differences. One-sided perception caused by cultural and historical differences can be overcome by integrating the other models of thinking, as well as by accepting the other “rules” of relations between people, including those, which have arisen under other cultural and historical conditions. This will lead to recognition that different cultural systems do not exclude, but successfully complement and enrich each other. Conclusions. Hall’s theory of culture and F. Kluckhohn and F. Strodtbeck’s value orientation theory contribute to better understanding of the representatives of other cultures, their attitudes towards the world and ways of communication, as well as promote the ability to be a successful intercultural dialogue’s participant.
References
Шинкарук В.Д., Салата Г.В., Данилова Т.В. Дихотомія «культура – цивілізація» в англо-американському і західноєвропейському науковому дискурсі. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2018. №2. C. 82-87.
Danylova T.V. The Desire for Recognition in the Context of Francis Fukuyama’s Universal History. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2016. Is.10. P. 69-77. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87303.
Danylova T.V. Searching for the True Self: The Way of Nondual Wisdom. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2017. Is.12. P. 7-15. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119069.
Hall E. The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday & Company, INC., 1959. 241 p.
Hall E. T. Beyond Culture. Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1976. 320 p.
Hall E. The Hidden Dimension. Anchor, 1990. 240 p.
Herzog C. Intercultural communication conflicts. GRIN Verlag, 2010. 40 p.
Hills M. Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Values Orientation Theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2002. 4(4). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1040].
Khmil V., Malivskyi A. Contemporary Reception of Rene Descartes’ Skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2017. Vol. 19. P. 168-178.
Kluckhohn F. Dominant and variant value orientations. Personality in nature, society, and culture / C. Kluckhohn & H. Murray (Eds.) NY: Alfred A. Khopf, 1953. P. 342-357.
Kluckhohn F., Strodtbeck F. Variations in Value Orientations. New York: Row, Peterson and Co., USA, 1961. 187 р.
O’Connor J., Seymour J. Introducing NLP Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Thorsons; (Reissue) edition, 2003. 245 p.
Samovar L.A., Porter R.E., McDaniel E.R. Communication between Cultures. Wadsworth Publishing; 7 edition, 2009. 480 p.
Storozhuk S.V., Hoyan I.M. Gender Equality as a Modern Phenomenon. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2017. Is. 11. P. 71-83. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105481
Storozhuk S., Goian I. Gender Existence: Correlation Between Equality and Identity. Philosophy and Cos-mology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 208-218.
Tung R. International Organizational Behaviour. Luthans Virtual OB. McGraw-Hill, 1995. P. 487-518.
Yablonska T., Dembytska N., Vus V. Social-psychological Adjustment of Ex-servicemen to Civilian Life. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach. 2017. Vol. 7. Is. 1. P. 168-177. DOI: 10.21277/sw.v1i7.285
Vus V., Kychkyruk T., Lokutova E. Social and Personal Development of Preschoolers Through The Lens of Parental Religious Educational Models. Science and Education. 2018. Is. 1. P. 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-1-8.
Wilson R.A. The New Inquisition. Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Falkon Press, Phoenix, Arisona, USA, 1987. 240 pp.
Yamakage M. The essence of Shinto: Japan’s spiritual heart / P. De Leeuw & A. Rankin, Eds. Tokyo: Ko-dansha International, 2006. 232 p.
Shynkaruk, V.D., Salata, G.V., & Danylova, T.V. (2018). The Dichotomy “Culture – Civilization” in the Anglo-American and Western European Scientific Discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2, 82-87 [in Ukrainian].
Danylova, T.V. (2016). The Desire for Recognition in the Context of Francis Fukuyama’s Universal History. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10, 69-77. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87303.
Danylova, T.V. (2017). Searching for the True Self: The Way of Nondual Wisdom. Anthropological Meas-urements of Philosophical Research. 12, 7-15. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119069.
Hall, E. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday & Company, INC.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books/Doubleday.
Hall, E. (1990). The Hidden Dimension. Anchor.
Herzog, C. (2010). Intercultural communication conflicts. GRIN Verlag.
Hills, M. (2002). Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Values Orientation Theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, (4). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1040].
Khmil, V., & Malivskyi, A. (2017). Contemporary Reception of Rene Descartes’ Skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology, 19, 168-178.
Kluckhohn, F. (1953). Dominant and variant value orientations. In C. Kluckhohn & H. Murray (Eds.), Per-sonality in nature, society, and culture (pp. 342-357). NY: Alfred A. Khopf.
Kluckhohn, F., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. New York: Row, Peterson and Co.
O’Connor, J., Seymour, J. (2003). Introducing NLP Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Thorsons; (Reissue) edition.
Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E., & McDaniel, E.R. (2009). Communication between Cultures. Wadsworth Pub-lishing; 7 edition.
Storozhuk, S.V., & Hoyan, I.M. (2017). Gender Equality as a Modern Phenomenon. Anthropological Meas-urements of Philosophical Research, 11, 71-83. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105481
Storozhuk, S., & Goian, I. (2017). Gender Existence: Correlation Between Equality and Identity. Philosophy and Cosmology, 18, 208-218.
Tung, R. (1995). International Organizational Behaviour. In Luthans Virtual OB (pp. 487-518). McGraw-Hill.
Yablonska, T., Dembytska, N., & Vus, V. (2017). Social-psychological Adjustment of Ex-servicemen to Civilian Life. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach, 7 (1), 168-177. DOI: 10.21277/sw.v1i7.285
Vus, V., Kychkyruk, T., & Lokutova, E. (2018). Social and Personal Development of Preschoolers Through the Lens of Parental Religious Educational Models. Science and Education, 1, 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-1-8.
Wilson R.A. (1987). The New Inquisition. Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science. Falkon Press, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Yamakage, M. (2006). The essence of Shinto: Japan’s spiritual heart. P. De Leeuw & A. Rankin (Eds.). To-kyo: Kodansha International.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).