The formation of “person of culture” as a project of future educational studios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147366Keywords:
consumerism, “efforts statement, ” affirmations, antropo-cosmic, synergetic, computer generation, visual revolution, postmodern education, “school of culture’s dialogue.”Abstract
Purpose of the article. The education should be a tool of reformation and power of development for these societies, who move from industrialism to post-industrialism. The goal of this article is to overcome recognition of this “classical” educational model and to search necessary components of the new educational paradigm. Methodology. The research was done by such general scientific methods as the method of analysis, of synthesis, of abstraction, consistency, and method of generalization. Scientific novelty.The study of this paradigm recognized by “school of culture’s dialogue” that requires the teacher of the new type, who meets the information age’s requirements of human history. Conclusions. During the process of the research was proved that formation processes determinant of “person of culture” are: new technic means of study for moving to new “computer thinking”; a new type of teacher without any specific subject. It’s noted that culture logic and human logic but not subject logic should be a base for dialogue in a formation process of “person of culture.”
References
Андрущенко В. Основні тенденції розвитку вищої освіти України на межі століть. Вища освіта України. 2001. № 1. С.18–26.
Зіньківський Ю. Імператив трансформації сучасної освітньої парадигми. Вища школа. 2010. № 3 – 4. С. 37– 43.
Иллич И. Освобождение от школ/ URL: http://lib100.com/pedagogics/exemption_from_school/html/ (дата звернення: квітень 2018).
Ильин И. Эволюционный подход к глобальным исследованиям и образованию: теоретико-методологические проблемы. Век глобализации. 2010. № 1. С. 3–17.
Кармадонов О. Институт образования в современном мире: основные тенденции развития. Соци-ально-гуманитарные знания. 2006. № 6. С. 55–74.
Квіт С. Потрібні зміни: зміст і завдання освітніх реформ URL: http://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2015/01/27/7056516/. (дата звернення: 15.02.2018).
Колот А. Трансформація чинників розвитку вищої освіти: причина, природа, змістові характеристики. Вища школа. 2008. № 4. С. 47–55.
Кремень В. Якісна освіта: сучасні вимоги. Педагогіка і психологія. 2006. № 4. С. 5–17.
Лисаускене М. В. Поколение NEXT – перфекционисты или романтики потребления. Социс. 2006. № 4. С. 111–115.
Попова Т. Образование как процесс накопления человеческого и культурного капитала. Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2005. № 6. С. 234–241.
Пригожин И. Порядок из хаоса: Новый диалог человека с природой: Пер. с англ. Ю. А. Данилова. Москва: Прогресс, 1986. 432 с. URL: http://yanko.lib.ru/books/betweenall/prigogine-stengers_ru.htm. (дата звернення: липень 2017)
Пуляев В. Движение человека к его целостному развитию. Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2014. № 4. С. 82–102.
Рорти Р. Философия и зеркало природы. URL: Режим доступу: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/5141. (дата звернення: січень 2018)
Сухарніков Ю. Методологічні засади перебудови й осучаснення вищої освіти. Вища школа. 2015. № 11 – 12. С. 35–61.
Теория культуры: учеб. пособие; под ред. С. Н. Иконниковой, В. П. Большакова. СПб.: Питер, 2008. 592 с.
Урсул А. Д. Глобально-эволюционный подход к перспективам образования. Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2011. № 1. С. 40–55.
Урсул А. Д. Модель образования ХХІ века: проблемы устойчивого развития и безопасности. Безо-пасность Евразии : журн. лич., нац. и коллектив. безопасности. М., 2001. № 4. С. 61–96.
Фрейре П. Образование как практика освобождения. URL: http://www.domrebenok.ru/blog/paulu-freyre-obrazovanie-kak-praktika-osvobozhdeniya/ (дата звернення: червень 2018).
Шеллер М. Положение человека в космосе. Проблемы человека в западной философии. URL:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pDc3zlWaT-43kPPVRk-bwA7dMwfW_hizQPmSeK3_iGw/preview.(дата звернення: травень 2018).
Andrushchenko, V. (2001). The main tendencies of higher education’s development in Ukraine at the turn of the century. Ukrainian higher education, 1, 18-26 [in Ukrainian].
Zinkivskyi, Yu., & Mirskykh, H. (2010). An imperative of contemporary educational paradigm’s transfor-mation. Higher school, 3-4, 37-43 [in Ukrainian].
Illich, I. Liberation from school. Retrieved from http://lib100.com/pedagogics/exemption_from_school/html/ [in Russian].
Ilin, I.V., & Ursul, A.D. (2010). An evolutionary approach to global researches and education: theoretic-methodological problems. Age of globalization, 1, 3-17 [in Russian].
Karmadonov, O.A. (2006). The institution of education in contemporary world: main tendencies of devel-opment. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 6, 55-74 [in Russian].
Kvіt, S. The necessary changes: contents and tasks of educational reforms. Retrieved from http://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2015/01/27/7056516/ [in Ukrainian].
Kolot, A. (2008). Transformation of higher education development factors: reason, nature, characteristics. Higher school, 4, 47-55 [in Ukrainian].
Kremen, V.H. (2006). The high-quality education: contemporary requirements. Pedagogy and psychology, 4, 5-17 [in Ukrainian].
Lisauskene, M.V. (2006). NEXT generation – perfectionists or romanticists of consumption. Sotsis, 4, 111-115 [in Russian].
Popova, T.S. (2005). Education as an accumulation process of human and cultural capital. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 6, 234-241 [in Russian].
Prigozhin, I., & Stengers, I. (1986). An order out of chaos: new dialogue of people with nature. (Yu.A. Danilova, Trans). V.I. Arshinov, Yu.L. Klimontovich, Yu.V. Sachkov (Eds.). Moscow: Progress. Retrieved from http://yanko.lib.ru/books/betweenall/prigogine-stengers_ru.htm [in Russian].
Pulyaev, V.T. (2014). Human movement to his general development. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 4, 82-102 [in Russian].
Rorti, R. Philosophy and mirror of nature. Retrieved from http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/5141 [in Rus-sian].
Sukharnikov, Yu. (2015). Methodological foundations of higher education’s reconstruction and modernization. Higher school, 11-12, 35-61 [in Ukrainian].
Ikonnikova, S.N., & Bolshakov, V.P. (Eds.). (2008). Theory of culture. Piter [in Russian].
Ursul, A.D., & Ursul, T.A. (2011). Global and evolutionary approach to the perspectives of education. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 1, 40-55 [in Russian].
Ursul, A.D. (2001). Study model of the 21th century: problems of stable development and security. Security of Eurasia, 4, 61-96 [in Russian].
Freyre, P. Education as a practice of liberation. Retrieved from http://www.domrebenok.ru/blog/paulu-freyre-obrazovanie-kak-praktika-osvobozhdeniya/ [in Russian].
Sheller, M. A human position in universe. Human problems in the west philosophy. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pDc3zlWaT-43kPPVRk-bwA7dMwfW_hizQPmSeK3_iGw/preview [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).