THE SYMBOLIC PROPERTIES OF LITURGICAL SINGING TRADITION: FROM THE CATEGORY OF SYMBOL TO THE NOETIC MEASUREMENT OF CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147402Keywords:
liturgical singing tradition, symbol, canon, noosphere, noetic culture measurements.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to reveal the symbolic properties of the liturgical singing tradition, which allows us to trace the main parameters of the category of a symbol and to identify the noetic dimensions of culture. Research methodology assumes the use of the following general scientific methods: typological – to identify key characteristics of the liturgical singing tradition; philosophical and aesthetic, musicological analytical, historical and cultural methods. The scientific novelty of this research consists in considering the musical side of the liturgical singing tradition as the main conductor in revealing its symbolic properties. Conclusions. The canonical verbal aspect of the liturgical order, like all its verbal elements, contributes to the interaction of the external-visual and inner-auditory sides, strengthens the «rational» direction of worship, while permeating with musical-auditory emanations and acquiring some symbolic ciphering – in the case of a direct connection with the singing presentation. Thus, the religious tradition of the temple can be considered as a stable model of the «philosophical style», which in turn represents a special spiritual phenomenon that characterizes human cognitive activity and its value-semantic results. The Orthodox liturgical and singing tradition appeals to memory in its sociocultural significance and makes the phenomenon of memory leading and especially noticeable, in particular, it allows us to notice what the phenomenon of memory is related to in musical creativity. In this regard, it is especially urgent to justify the meaning of memory as a cultural universal, to define the semantic function of the notion of memory in Orthodox worship, and also to relate the phenomenon of memory to the chronotopic approach to the history of culture, with the temporal-spatial dimension of culture.
References
Аверинцев С. Поэтика ранневизантийской литературы. Санкт-Петербург : Азбука-классика, 2004. 480 с.
Бердяев Н. Вечность и время // Вестник РХД. Париж – Нью-Йорк – Москва, 1998. С. 135–140.
Лотман Ю. Внутри мыслящих миров. Семиосфера. Санкт-Петербург : Искусство-СПБ, 2001. С. 150-392.
Осадчая С. Теоретические аспекты изучения православной певческой традиции: история и совре-менность : [монография]. Одесса : Астропринт, 2012. 264 с.
Самойленко А. Диалог как музыкально-культурологический феномен: методологические аспекты со-временного музыкознания: дис. … доктора искусствоведения. 17.00.03. Одесса, 2003. 437 с.
Самойленко А. Музыковедение и методология гуманитарного знания. Проблема диалога: Моногра-фия. Одесса : Астропринт, 2002. 244 с.
Флоренский П. Из богословского наследия // Богословские труды. Москва, 1972. Вып. 9. С. 85–248.
Флоренский П. Философия культа. Москва : Мысль, 2004. 685 с.
Флоренский П., свящ. Стоп и утверждение истины: Опыт православной теодицеи. Москва : ООО Из-дательство АСТ, 2003. 640 с.
Averintsev, S. (2004) The poetics of early Byzantine literature. S.-P. : Classical alphabet [in Russian].
Berdyaev, N. (1998) Eternity and time. Bulletin of the RHD. Paris –New York – Moscow [in Russian].
Lotman, Yu. (2001) Inside the thinking worlds. The Semiosphere. S.-Pb.: Art-SPB [in Russian].
Osadchaya, S. (2012) Theoretical aspects of studying the Orthodox singing tradition: history and modernity: [monograph]. Odessa: Astroprint [in Russian].
Samoylenko, A. (2003) Dialogue as a musical and cultural phenomenon: the methodological aspects of modern musicology. Doctor’s thesis. Odessa. [in Russian].
Samoylenko, A. (2002) Musicology and methodology of humanitarian knowledge. The problem of dialogue: Monograph. Odessa: Astroprint [in Russian].
Florensky, P. (1972) From the theological heritage. Theological works. Moscow, 9 [in Russian].
Florensky, P. (2004) Philosophy of the cult. Moscow : Thought [in Russian].
Florensky, P. (2003) Stop and the affirmation of the truth: The experience of Orthodox theodicy. Moscow: OOO AST Publishing House [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).