Reception of the poem «Do not sing, beauties with me» O.S. Pushkin in the music of the XIX and XX centuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147430Keywords:
reception, text-first source, А.S. Pushkin, romance, interpretative-communicative process, creative reception.Abstract
The purpose of article is to consider musical interpretations of A.S. Pushkin «Do not sing, a beauty with me» through the prism of the receptive approach, revealing the specifics of the implementation of this poem in selected romances of composers of the ХІХ and ХХ centuries. Methodology. The basis of this study is the system-semiological method; аlso, comparative, analytical and genre-nominative approaches are used in the work. The scientific novelty of the study is determined by the inadequate elaboration of the receptive approach in the musicological literature, and also by the attempt to present the poem by A.S. Pushkin «Do not sing, beauty with me» as an open work for composer interpretations, revealing its semantic mobility. Conclusions. Pushkin’s poem «Do not sing, a beauty with me» is an implicitly constructed text containing a conditional (final) meaning for a new reception event. This allows us to talk about the embodiment of the principles of the so-called creative or productive reception, the result of which is the emergence of a new composition. This reception clearly and convincingly reflects the dialogic nature of art, which is based on the principle of potential co-creation.
References
Абрамовских Е. Креативная рецепция незаконченного текста. URL: https://www.slideshare.net/PGSGA/ss-34987835 (дата обращения: 23.11.2017).
Апполонова А. Система мотивов в лирике А.С. Пушкина 1820-х гг.: автореф. дис. ... канд. филолог. наук.: 10.01.01; Москов. госуд. университет им. М.В. Ломоносова. М., 2003. 22 с.
Безруков А. Рецепция художественного текста: функциональный подход. Русско-польский институт. Вроцлав, 2015. 300 с.
Беленькая И. Тема Испании и Востока в русской камерно-вокальной лирике ХIХ века: к проблеме «своего» и «чужого»: автореф. дис...канд иск.: 24.00.01; ДВПИ им. В.В. Куйбышева. Владивосток, 2004. 28 с.
Брянцева В. С.В. Рахманинов (1873–1943). Москва: Сов. композитор, 1976. 645 с.
Васина-Гроссман В. Русский романс конца XIX и начала XX столетия. Романсы Рахманинова. Рус-ский классический романс XIX века. Москва: Изд-во АН СССР, 1956. С. 299–339.
Гендлер И., Головачева Ю. Проблема музыкальной интерпретации поэтического текста (на мате-риале романса «Не пой, красавица, при мне» и его музыкальных интрепретаций М. Глинки, М. Балакирева, С. Рахманинова). Москва, 2011. С.42–48.
Димитриади Н. Некоторые стилевые особенности русской музыки о Востоке. Вопросы теории и эстетики музыки. Л., 1974. Вып. 13. С. 106–125.
Дурандина Е. Камерные вокальные жанры в русской музыке XIX – XX вв.: историко-стилевые аспек-ты: автореф. дис. ... докт. искусств.: 17.00.02; Российская академия музыки им. Гнесиных. М., 2002. 38 с.
Левакин Н. Художественная рецепция как литературоведческое понятие (к вопросу понимания термина). Известия Пятигорского госуд. лингвистического университета им. В. Г. Белинского. Пятигорск, 2012. № 27. С. 308–310.
Лобзакова Е. Рецепция в музыкознании: к вопросу использования термина. Южно-Российский музыкальный альманах. 2015. – № 3 (20). С. 5–9.
Мельникова Е. Понятие рецепции: современные исследовательские подходы к анализу текстов культуры. Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2012. № 3. Т. 1 (Гуманитарные науки). С. 239–242.
Мерситов Е. Сравнительный анализ романсов «Не пой, красавица при мне» на слова А.С. Пушкина в интерпретации М.И. Глинки и С.В. Рахманинова / Е. Мереситов URL: https://www.scienceforum.ru/2016/pdf/21114.pdf (дата обращения 01.12.2017).
Приходовская Е. Встречные интенции языка: к вопросу творческих поисков и решений компо-зитора. URL: http//www.teoria-practica/-5-2014/culture/prichodovskaya.pdf. (дата обращения 10.12.2017).
Хуторська А. Композиторська інтерпретація поетичного тексту як художній переклад (на прикладі камерно-вокальної музики): автореф. … канд. мистецтвоз.: 17.00.03; Харківський державний університет мистецтв ім. І.П. Котляревського. Харків, 2009. 19 с.
Чигарева Е. Рецепция Моцарта в творчестве отечественных композиторов второй половины ХХ века. Моцарт в России. Нижний Новгород, 2007. С. 83–88.
Шаймухаметова Л. Семантический анализ музыкальной темы Л. Шаймухаметова. Москва: РАМ им. Гнесиных, 1998. 265 с.
Abramovskikh E. (2014) Creative reception of unfinished text. URL: https://www.slideshare.net/PGSGA/ss-34987835 [in Russian].
Appolonova A. (2003) The system of motives in lyric poetry Pushkin in the 1820s.: Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. M. [in Russian].
Bezrukov A. (2015) The reception of the literary text: the functional approach. The Russian-Polish Institute. Wroclaw [in Russian].
Belenkaya I. (2004) The theme of Spain and the East in the Russian chamber-vocal lyric poetry of the twentieth century: the problem of «one’s own» and «another’s»: Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Vladivostok [in Russian].
Bryantseva V. (1976) S.V. Rachmaninov (1873-1943). Moskva: Sov. compositor [in Russian].
Vasina-Grossman V. (1956) Russian romance at the end of the XIXth and beginning of the XXth century. Romances of Rachmaninov. Russian classical romance of the XIX century. Moskva: Izd-vo AN SSSR, P. 299–339 [in Russian].
Gendler I., Golovacheva Yu. (2011) The problem of musical interpretation of the poetic text (on the material of the romance «Do not sing, beauty, with me» and his musical interpretations of M. Glinka, M. Balakirev, S. Rachmaninov). M., P.42–48 [in Russian].
Dimitriadi N. (1974) Some style features of Russian music about the East. Questions of theory and aesthetics of music. L., Vip. 13., P. 106–125 [in Russian].
Durandina E. (2002) Chamber vocal genres in Russian music of the XIX – XX centuries: historical and stylistic aspects: Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. M.[in Russian].
Levakin N. (2012) Art reception as a literary concept (to the question of understanding the term). News of Pyatigorsk city. Linguistic University. VG Belinsky. Pyatigorsk, № 27. P. 308–310 [in Russian].
Lobzakova E. (2015) Reception in musicology: to the question of the use of the term. South Russian musical almanac. № 3 (20). P. 5–9 [in Russian].
Melnikova E. (2012) The concept of reception: modern research approaches to the analysis of cultural texts. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. № 3. Т. 1 (The humanities). P. 239-242 [in Russian].
Mersitov E. Comparative analysis of romances «Do not sing, beauty at me» to the words of A.S. Pushkin in the interpretation of M.I. Glinka and S.V. Rachmaninov. URL: https://www.scienceforum.ru/2016/pdf/21114.pdf [in Russian].
Prikhodskaya E. Counter Intentions of the Language: to the Question of Creative Search and the Composer’s Solutions. URL: http // www.teoria-practica / -5-2014 / culture / prichodovskaya.pdf [in Russian].
Khutorskaya A. (2009) Composer’s interpretation of the poetic text yak artistic transfer (on the application of chamber-vocal music): Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Харків [in Ukrainian].
Chigareva E. (2007) Mozart’s reception in the works of Russian composers of the second half of the XXth century. Mozart in Russia. Nizhnii Novgorod, P. 83–88 [in Russian].
Shaimukhametova L. (1998) Semantic analysis of a musical theme. Moskva: RAM im. Gnesinyh [in Rus-sian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
