MYTH AS A PHENOMENON OF CULTURE

Authors

  • Vasyl Shynkaruk National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Halyna Salata College of Kiev University of Culture, Ukraine
  • Tetyana Danylova National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.152938

Keywords:

myth, mythology, worldview, human, world, nature, sacred time, profane time, philosophy, science

Abstract

The purpose of the study. This paper aims at exploring myth as a phenomenon of culture. Methodology of the study. The authors have used anthropological integrative approach, semiotic method of representing myth as a language of culture, as well as phenomenological method. The scientific novelty. Myths provide meaning and purpose to all elements of culture. Myth underlies cultural reality – it is a core of culture. If we imagine culture as an onion comprised of different layers (the “onion” model of culture), then myth is the center of it – it is a core beyond articulation. It generates our beliefs and assumptions that are rarely explicated, however these beliefs and assumptions shape both the structure of personality and culture. They are taken for granted, but support any culture. They manifest themselves in an explicit form in values, purposes, goals, strategies and philosophies, which motivate us and shape our reality. Conclusions. Mythology is one of the ways to comprehend and interpret the world around us. Its basic concepts are the “world” and “human”. Through the lens of these concepts, people realized their destiny in the world and formed life attitudes during the early stages of human development. Giving place to philosophy and science, mythology has not lost its important place in human history. Mythological narratives were borrowed by many religions. In recent decades, representatives of literature and art have intentionally used myths to express their ideas. They have not only rethought ancient myths, but have created new mythological symbols. Nowadays, an interest in myths and mythologies has dramatically increased, and it is not by chance. The famous researchers of the primitive cultures and mythologies as the ways of mastering and interpreting the world have demonstrated the creative power and heuristic potential of myths that will be manifested in the future.

Author Biographies

Vasyl Shynkaruk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Humanities and Pedagogy,

Halyna Salata, College of Kiev University of Culture

PhD in History, Director

Tetyana Danylova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy

References

Голосовкер Я.Э. Избранное. Логика мифа. М.; СПб.: Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2010. 499 с.

Лосев А.Ф. Диалектика мифа. М.: Академический проект, 2008. 304 с.

Лосев А. Ф. История античной эстетики. Софисты. Сократ. Платон. М.: Фолио; АСТ, 2000. 848 с.

Мелетинский Е.М. Поэтика мифа. М.: Наука, 1976. 407 с.

Шинкарук В.Д., Салата Г.В., Данилова Т.В. Дихотомія «культура – цивілізація» в англо-американському і західноєвропейському науковому дискурсі. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2018. №2. C. 82-87.

Brockmeier J. Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Narrative and Identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture / J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001. PP. 39-58.

Buxton R.G.A., Bolle K.W., Smith J.Z. Myth. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2017. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/topic/myth.

Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Yale University Press. 1953. 237 p.

Danylova T.V. Eastern Mysticism and Timothy Leary: Human Beyond the Conventional Reality. Anthropo-logical Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2017. Is.11. P. 135-142. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105498.

Danylova T.V. Searching for the True Self: The Way of Nondual Wisdom. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2017. Is.12. P. 7-15. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119069.

Danylova T.V. The Way to the Self: The Novel “Steppenwolf” Through the Lens of Jungian Process of Individuation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2015. Is. 7. P. 28-35.

Hofstede’s Cultural Onion. Notes on Intercultural Communication. 2013. Retrieved from https://laofutze.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/303/

Jung K.G., Kerenyi C. Essays on a Science of Mythology. Princeton University Press. 1969. 208 p.

Khmil V., Malivskyi A. Contemporary Reception of Rene Descartes’ Skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2017. Is. 19, P. 168-178.

Levy-Bruhl L. Primitive Mentality. Forgotten Books, 2018. 470 p.

Magoulick M. What is Myth? Folklore Connections. 2015. Retrieved from https://faculty.gcsu.edu/custom-website/mary-magoulick/defmyth.htm

Malinowski B. Magic, Science and Religion. Martino Fine Books, 2015. 92 p.

Maffesoli M. Interview with Michel Maffesoli. Mètode. Universitat de València. 2013. Retrieved from https://metode.org/issues/entrevista-revistes/michel-maffesoli-2.html

McCalman I. Cultural History and Cultural Studies: the linguistic turn five years on. (Undated). Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/events/history/papers/Iain_McCalman.html

Nietzsche F. The Birth of Tragedy or Hellenism and Pessimism. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016. 176 p.

Segal R.A. Jung and Levy-Bruhl. Journal of Analytical Psychology. 2007. Vol. 52. Is. 5. P. 635-658.

Storozhuk S., Goian I. Greek “φύσις” as the Basis of Gender Stereotypes. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2016. Is. 10. P. 78-89. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87306

Storozhuk S., Goian I. Gender Existence: Correlation Between Equality and Identity. Philosophy and Cos-mology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 208-218.

Vus V., Kychkyruk T., Lokutova E. Social and Personal Development of Preschoolers Through The Lens of Parental Religious Educational Models. Science and Education. 2018. Is. 1. P. 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-1-8

Golosovker, Ya.E. (2010). Selected works. The logic of myth. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Center for Hu-manitarian Initiatives [in Russian].

Losev, A.F. (2008). Dialectics of myth. Moscow: Academic project [in Russian].

Losev, A.F. (2000). The history of ancient aesthetics. The Sophists. Socrates. Plato. Moscow: Folio; AST [in Russian].

Meletinsky, Ye.M. Poetics of myth. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Shynkaruk, V.D., Salata, G.V., & Danylova, T.V. (2018). The Dichotomy “Culture – Civilization” in the An-glo-American and Western European Scientific Discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2, 82-87 [in Ukrainian].

Brockmeier, J. (2001). Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Narrative and Identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture / J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Buxton, R.G.A., Bolle, K.W., & Smith, J.Z. (2017). Myth. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/topic/myth.

Cassirer, E. (1953). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Yale University Press.

Danylova, T.V. (2017). Eastern Mysticism and Timothy Leary: Human Beyond the Conventional Reality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 135-142. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105498.

Danylova, T.V. (2017). Searching for the True Self: The Way of Nondual Wisdom. Anthropological Meas-urements of Philosophical Research, 12, 7-15. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119069.

Danylova, T.V. (2015). The Way to the Self: The Novel “Steppenwolf” Through the Lens of Jungian Process of Individuation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 7, 28-35.

Hofstede’s Cultural Onion. Notes on Intercultural Communication. 2013. Retrieved from https://laofutze.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/303/

Jung, K.G., & Kerenyi, C. (1969). Essays on a Science of Mythology. Princeton University Press.

Khmil, V., & Malivskyi, A. (2017). Contemporary Reception of Rene Descartes’ Skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology, 19, 168-178.

Levy-Bruhl, L. (2018). Primitive Mentality. Forgotten Books.

Magoulick, M. (2015). What is Myth? Folklore Connections. Retrieved from https://faculty.gcsu.edu/custom-website/mary-magoulick/defmyth.htm

Malinowski, B. (2015). Magic, Science and Religion. Martino Fine Books.

Maffesoli, M. (2013). Interview with Michel Maffesoli. Mètode. Universitat de València. Retrieved from https://metode.org/issues/entrevista-revistes/michel-maffesoli-2.html

McCalman, I. (Undated). Cultural History and Cultural Studies: the linguistic turn five years on. Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/events/history/papers/Iain_McCalman.html

Nietzsche, F. (2016). The Birth of Tragedy or Hellenism and Pessimism. CreateSpace Independent Pub-lishing Platform.

Segal, R.A. (2007). Jung and Levy-Bruhl. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 52(5), 635-658.

Storozhuk, S., & Goian, I. (2016). Greek “φύσις” as the Basis of Gender Stereotypes. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10, 78-89. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87306

Storozhuk, S., Goian, I. Gender Existence: Correlation Between Equality and Identity. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 208-218.

Vus V., Kychkyruk T., & Lokutova E. (2018). Social and Personal Development of Preschoolers Through The Lens of Parental Religious Educational Models. Science and Education, 1, 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-1-8

Downloads

Published

2018-11-27

Issue

Section

Культурологія