MYTH AS A PHENOMENON OF CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.152938Keywords:
myth, mythology, worldview, human, world, nature, sacred time, profane time, philosophy, scienceAbstract
The purpose of the study. This paper aims at exploring myth as a phenomenon of culture. Methodology of the study. The authors have used anthropological integrative approach, semiotic method of representing myth as a language of culture, as well as phenomenological method. The scientific novelty. Myths provide meaning and purpose to all elements of culture. Myth underlies cultural reality – it is a core of culture. If we imagine culture as an onion comprised of different layers (the “onion” model of culture), then myth is the center of it – it is a core beyond articulation. It generates our beliefs and assumptions that are rarely explicated, however these beliefs and assumptions shape both the structure of personality and culture. They are taken for granted, but support any culture. They manifest themselves in an explicit form in values, purposes, goals, strategies and philosophies, which motivate us and shape our reality. Conclusions. Mythology is one of the ways to comprehend and interpret the world around us. Its basic concepts are the “world” and “human”. Through the lens of these concepts, people realized their destiny in the world and formed life attitudes during the early stages of human development. Giving place to philosophy and science, mythology has not lost its important place in human history. Mythological narratives were borrowed by many religions. In recent decades, representatives of literature and art have intentionally used myths to express their ideas. They have not only rethought ancient myths, but have created new mythological symbols. Nowadays, an interest in myths and mythologies has dramatically increased, and it is not by chance. The famous researchers of the primitive cultures and mythologies as the ways of mastering and interpreting the world have demonstrated the creative power and heuristic potential of myths that will be manifested in the future.
References
Голосовкер Я.Э. Избранное. Логика мифа. М.; СПб.: Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2010. 499 с.
Лосев А.Ф. Диалектика мифа. М.: Академический проект, 2008. 304 с.
Лосев А. Ф. История античной эстетики. Софисты. Сократ. Платон. М.: Фолио; АСТ, 2000. 848 с.
Мелетинский Е.М. Поэтика мифа. М.: Наука, 1976. 407 с.
Шинкарук В.Д., Салата Г.В., Данилова Т.В. Дихотомія «культура – цивілізація» в англо-американському і західноєвропейському науковому дискурсі. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2018. №2. C. 82-87.
Brockmeier J. Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Narrative and Identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture / J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001. PP. 39-58.
Buxton R.G.A., Bolle K.W., Smith J.Z. Myth. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2017. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/topic/myth.
Cassirer E. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Yale University Press. 1953. 237 p.
Danylova T.V. Eastern Mysticism and Timothy Leary: Human Beyond the Conventional Reality. Anthropo-logical Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2017. Is.11. P. 135-142. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105498.
Danylova T.V. Searching for the True Self: The Way of Nondual Wisdom. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2017. Is.12. P. 7-15. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119069.
Danylova T.V. The Way to the Self: The Novel “Steppenwolf” Through the Lens of Jungian Process of Individuation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2015. Is. 7. P. 28-35.
Hofstede’s Cultural Onion. Notes on Intercultural Communication. 2013. Retrieved from https://laofutze.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/303/
Jung K.G., Kerenyi C. Essays on a Science of Mythology. Princeton University Press. 1969. 208 p.
Khmil V., Malivskyi A. Contemporary Reception of Rene Descartes’ Skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2017. Is. 19, P. 168-178.
Levy-Bruhl L. Primitive Mentality. Forgotten Books, 2018. 470 p.
Magoulick M. What is Myth? Folklore Connections. 2015. Retrieved from https://faculty.gcsu.edu/custom-website/mary-magoulick/defmyth.htm
Malinowski B. Magic, Science and Religion. Martino Fine Books, 2015. 92 p.
Maffesoli M. Interview with Michel Maffesoli. Mètode. Universitat de València. 2013. Retrieved from https://metode.org/issues/entrevista-revistes/michel-maffesoli-2.html
McCalman I. Cultural History and Cultural Studies: the linguistic turn five years on. (Undated). Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/events/history/papers/Iain_McCalman.html
Nietzsche F. The Birth of Tragedy or Hellenism and Pessimism. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016. 176 p.
Segal R.A. Jung and Levy-Bruhl. Journal of Analytical Psychology. 2007. Vol. 52. Is. 5. P. 635-658.
Storozhuk S., Goian I. Greek “φύσις” as the Basis of Gender Stereotypes. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2016. Is. 10. P. 78-89. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87306
Storozhuk S., Goian I. Gender Existence: Correlation Between Equality and Identity. Philosophy and Cos-mology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 208-218.
Vus V., Kychkyruk T., Lokutova E. Social and Personal Development of Preschoolers Through The Lens of Parental Religious Educational Models. Science and Education. 2018. Is. 1. P. 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-1-8
Golosovker, Ya.E. (2010). Selected works. The logic of myth. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Center for Hu-manitarian Initiatives [in Russian].
Losev, A.F. (2008). Dialectics of myth. Moscow: Academic project [in Russian].
Losev, A.F. (2000). The history of ancient aesthetics. The Sophists. Socrates. Plato. Moscow: Folio; AST [in Russian].
Meletinsky, Ye.M. Poetics of myth. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Shynkaruk, V.D., Salata, G.V., & Danylova, T.V. (2018). The Dichotomy “Culture – Civilization” in the An-glo-American and Western European Scientific Discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 2, 82-87 [in Ukrainian].
Brockmeier, J. (2001). Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Narrative and Identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture / J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds). Amsterdam &Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Buxton, R.G.A., Bolle, K.W., & Smith, J.Z. (2017). Myth. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/topic/myth.
Cassirer, E. (1953). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Yale University Press.
Danylova, T.V. (2017). Eastern Mysticism and Timothy Leary: Human Beyond the Conventional Reality. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 11, 135-142. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i11.105498.
Danylova, T.V. (2017). Searching for the True Self: The Way of Nondual Wisdom. Anthropological Meas-urements of Philosophical Research, 12, 7-15. Doi 10.15802/ampr.v0i12.119069.
Danylova, T.V. (2015). The Way to the Self: The Novel “Steppenwolf” Through the Lens of Jungian Process of Individuation. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 7, 28-35.
Hofstede’s Cultural Onion. Notes on Intercultural Communication. 2013. Retrieved from https://laofutze.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/303/
Jung, K.G., & Kerenyi, C. (1969). Essays on a Science of Mythology. Princeton University Press.
Khmil, V., & Malivskyi, A. (2017). Contemporary Reception of Rene Descartes’ Skepticism. Philosophy and Cosmology, 19, 168-178.
Levy-Bruhl, L. (2018). Primitive Mentality. Forgotten Books.
Magoulick, M. (2015). What is Myth? Folklore Connections. Retrieved from https://faculty.gcsu.edu/custom-website/mary-magoulick/defmyth.htm
Malinowski, B. (2015). Magic, Science and Religion. Martino Fine Books.
Maffesoli, M. (2013). Interview with Michel Maffesoli. Mètode. Universitat de València. Retrieved from https://metode.org/issues/entrevista-revistes/michel-maffesoli-2.html
McCalman, I. (Undated). Cultural History and Cultural Studies: the linguistic turn five years on. Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/events/history/papers/Iain_McCalman.html
Nietzsche, F. (2016). The Birth of Tragedy or Hellenism and Pessimism. CreateSpace Independent Pub-lishing Platform.
Segal, R.A. (2007). Jung and Levy-Bruhl. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 52(5), 635-658.
Storozhuk, S., & Goian, I. (2016). Greek “φύσις” as the Basis of Gender Stereotypes. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10, 78-89. DOI: 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87306
Storozhuk, S., Goian, I. Gender Existence: Correlation Between Equality and Identity. Philosophy and Cosmology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 208-218.
Vus V., Kychkyruk T., & Lokutova E. (2018). Social and Personal Development of Preschoolers Through The Lens of Parental Religious Educational Models. Science and Education, 1, 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-1-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).