POST-TOTALITARIAN PRACTICES OF SOVIET AND POLISH COMEDY FILMS OF 1960 –1980s.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.152996Keywords:
totalitarian, post-totalitarian practices, laughter, laughter culture, Soviet comedy films, Polish comedy films.Abstract
The purpose of the research. The processes of integration of the post-socialist countries into European cultural space have different speed and rhythm as well as controversial vectors. One of the crucial factors that define the intensity of these processes, is a culture’s maturity in understanding different aspects of the totalitarian past, and also a certain level of development of reflective practices of the political and cultural elite. The artifacts of comedy films show the highest level of concentration of the anti-totalitarian discourse in the culture of post-totalitarian times. They also reveal certain mental differences of the representatives of various post-totalitarian societies. The article aims at making the comparative analysis of the Soviet and Polish comedy films of 1960–1980s. This analysis clearly shows both common and different characteristics of the anti-totalitarian practices of these cultures. The methodology. The phenomenon of laughter is studied with the help of different paradigms of the laughter philosophy, namely, the theories of incongruity, of relief, of superiority etc.; all these theories are seen as mutually complementary. The legacy of G. Daneliya and Bareja is interpreted with the help of the crypto-religious methodology. We also use some methodological practices of M. Bakhtin and representatives of the contemporary Bakhtin studies. The scientific novelty. For the first time ever the material is analyzed in the philosophical and culturological context and in the aspect of the anti-totalitarian discourse. Conclusion. We state and research the comparatively early appearance of the philosophical reflection in the Polish comedy of such a cause of totalitarian practices as the atomization of an individual (H. Arendt); analyze the original semantics of the critical discourse of G. Daneliya’s comedy “33”; reveal the anti-totalitarian subtexts of some other comedies.
References
Арендт Х. Джерела тоталітаризму. К.: Дух і літера, 2001. 539 с.
Аристотель. Поэтика. Риторика. СПб.: Азбука-классика, 2007. 352 с.
Бахтин М. М. Творчество Франсуа Рабле и народная культура средневековья и Ренессанса. М.: Худож. Лит., 1990. 543 с.
Бергсон А. Введение в метафизику. Смех. URL: http://krotov.info/library/02_b/er/gson_smeh.htm
Громов Владимир. Божество ушедшей эпохи (о фильме Станислава Барейи «Мишка»). URL: https://culture.pl/ru/article/bozhestvo-ushedshey-epohi-o-filme-stanislava-bareyi-mishka
Гумилев Л.Н. Ритмы Евразии: Эпохи и цивилизации. М.: АСТ, 2004. 608 с.
Еліаде М. Священне і мирське; Міфи, сновидіння і містерії; Мефістофель і андроген; Окультизм, ворожбитство та культурні уподобання / пер. з нім., фр., англ. Г. Кьорян, В. Сахно. К.: Видавництво Соломії Павличко «Основи», 2001. 591 с.
О бедном гусаре замолвите слово. Материал из Википедии – свободной энциклопедии. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki
Пролеєв С. Сміх і панування / Δόξα / ДОКСА. // Зб. наук. праць з філософії та філології. Одеса, 2005. Вип. 7. Людина на межі смішного і серйозного. С. 51–58.
Столяр М. Советская смеховая культура. К.: Стилос, 2011. 304 с.
Bardon Adrian. Dr. The Philosophy of Humor. URL: http://faculty.swosu.edu/frederic.murray/Philosophy%20of%20Humor_1.pdf
Linz J., & Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation.
Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. – Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 480 p.
Stoliar M., & Stechenko T. The discourse of the laughter theory in the optics of Postpositivism and Postmodernism. Гілея: науковий вісник. Збірник наукових праць / Гол. ред. В.М. Вашкевич. К.: ВІП УАЕ, 2018. Вип. 131 (№ 4). С. 316–320.
Stolyar Maryna. Fenomen śmiechu w kontekście posttotalitarnej praktyki na podstawie sowieckiej i polskiej anegdoty z lat siedemdziesiątych i osiemdziesiątych ХХ wieku, «Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny».– Tom XIV (2017). Nº 4. с. 193–206.
Arendt, Kh. (2001). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Кyiv: Dukh і lіtera [in Ukrainian]
Aristotel' (1983). Works in 4 volumes. V. 4. M.: Thought [in Russian].
Bahtin, M.M. (1990). The work of François Rabelais and the Popular Culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance). M.: Hud. lit. [in Russian].
Bergson, H. Laughter. An essay on the meaning of the comic. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4352/4352-h/4352-h.htm [in Russian].
Gromov Vladimir. Demigod of a bygone era (about Stanislaw Bareja’ film “Mishka”). Retrieved from https://culture.pl/ru/article/bozhestvo-ushedshey-epohi-o-filme-stanislava-bareyi-mishka [in Russian].
Gumilev, L.N. (2004). Rhythms of Eurasia: Epochs and Civilizations. M. : AST. [in Russian].
Elіade, M. (2001) The Sacred and the Profane. Myths, Dreams and Mysteries. Mephistopheles and the Androgene. Occultism, Witchcraft and Cultural Fashions). Кyiv: Vidavnitstvo Solomії Pavlichko «Osnovi». [in Ukrainian]
Tell a Word about a Poor Hussar. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki [in Russian].
Proleiev, S. (2005). Laugh and domination. Δόξα / DOKSA. Journal in philosophy and philology. Odesa: Odesa National University Press, 7. P. 51–58. [in Ukrainian]
Stolyar, M. (2011). Soviet laughter-culture. K.: Stylus. [in Russian].
Bardon Adrian. Dr. The Philosophy of Humor. Retrieved from http://faculty.swosu.edu/frederic.murray/Philosophy%20of%20Humor_1.pdf
Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stoliar, M., & Stechenko, T. (2018).The discourse of the laughter theory in the optics of Postpositivism and Postmodernism. Gіleya. Scientific journal. V.M. Vashkevich (Ed.). K.: VІP UAE, V. 131, 4, 316–320.
Stolyar Maryna (2017). The phenomenon of laugh in the context of post-totalitarian practice based on the Soviet and Polish anecdotes from the 70 and 80-ch-ch ХХ century. Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny. Tom XIV, 4, 193–206 [in Polish].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).