Influence of the information and communication environment on the axiosphere of society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.153004Keywords:
information-communicative environment, axiosphere, value orientations, socio-cultural spaceAbstract
The purpose of the article is to study the influence of the information and communication environment on the functioning of the axiosphere of modern society. The methodology of the research consists in the application of analytical, semiotic and culturological methods in studying the axiological component of the communication process, the role of mass media in translating values in modern society and influencing the functioning of the axiosphere of the society. Scientific novelty of the work consists in revealing the axiological component of the communicative environment and its influence on the axiosphere of society, which has both positive and negative consequences. Conclusions. As a result of the research, it was established that information and communication technologies, based on digital reproduction of information, led to cardinal transformations of all spheres of public life both on a practical plane and in relations between ideological and value aspects, transforming awareness of various levels of human life. In the information and communication environment, information becomes the primary value. Media, forming a particular information space, represent the values of society and exercise axiological influence on individuals and society as a whole.
References
Бакіров В. С., Ручка А. О. Соціологія цінностей сьогодні. Проблеми розвитку соціологічної теорії: матеріали IX Всеукр. наук.-практ. конф. «Проблеми розвитку соціологічної теорії: концептуалізація ціннісних змін у сучасному суспільстві», 2 лист. 2012 р., (м. Київ). Київ: Логос, 2013. С. 5–17.
Девтеров І.В. Характер соціальної комунікації в мережі інтернет. Теорія і практика управління соціа-льними системами. 2011. № 3. С. 66–72.
Демченко С. В. Медіаполітична система в сучасній Україні (інтегрована комунікаційна модель): авто-реф. дис. … канд. політ. наук. 23.00.02 Дніпропертровськ: Дніпропетр. нац. ун-т., 2004. 18 с.
Каган М.С. Философская теория ценности. СПб: Петербург, 1997. 295 с.
Кастельс М. Власть коммуникации: учеб. пособие. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016. 564 с.
Малашина Т.И. Аксиологическое измерение современных коммуникативных процессов. Вестник РЭУ им. Г. В. Плеханова. Вступление. Путь в науку. 2016. № 1. С. 37–42.
Сіверс В.А. Cимволічні трансформації цінності. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2011. № 1. С.3–8.
Суворова И.М. Аксиосфера культуры как синергетическая система. Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль. 2014. № 2 (24). С.352–355.
Федорова І. І. Інформаційна ера: глобальні трансформації культурного простору. Вісник НТУУ «КПІ». Філософія. Психологія. Педагогіка. 2015. Випуск 2. С.98–104.
Шакирова Е.Ю. Мозаичность современного социокультурного пространства. Вестник ВЭГУ. 2014. № 1 (69). С.140– 147.
Шакирова Е. Ю. Общее представление о строении и динамике современного социокультурного про-странства. Вестник ВГУ. Серия: Философия. 2013. № 2. С.108–124.
Suarez-Villa L. Globalization and Technocapitalism The Political Economy of Corporate Power and Technological Domination. New York: Routledge, 2016. 250 р.
Bakirov, V.S., Ruchka, A.O. Sociology of values today (2013 Problems of development of sociological theory: materials IX Vseukr. Sci. Pract. Conf. "Problems of the development of sociological theory: conceptualization of value changes in modern society", 2 pages. 2012, (Kyiv). Kiev. Nats., Un-t im.T. Shevchenko [and others; Under the control of Sudakova V.I., Kutsenko O.D.]). K .: Logos, 5–17 [in Ukrainian].
Devertov, I.V. (2011). Character of social communication in the Internet. Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsial'nymy systemamy, 3, 66–72 [in Ukrainian].
Demchenko, S.V. (2004). Media-political system in modern Ukraine (integrated communication model). Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Dn. [in Ukrainian].
Kagan, M.S. (1997). Philosophical theory of value. SPb: Peterburh [in Russian].
Castells, M. (2016). Power of Communication. M.: Izd. dom Vyisshey shkolyi ekonomiki [in Russian].
Malashina, T.I. (2016). Axiological measurement of modern communicative processes. Vestnik REU im. G. V. Plehanova. Vstuplenie. Put v nauku, 1, 37-42 [in Russian].
Sivers, V.A. (2011). Symbolic transformation of value. Visnik NatsIonalnoyi akademiyi kerivnih kadriv kulturi i mistetstv, 1, 3-8 [in Ukrainian].
Suvorova, I.M. (2014). Axiomosphere of culture as a synergistic system. Istoricheskaya i sotsialno-obrazovatelnaya myisl, 2 (24), 352–355 [in Russian].
Fedorova, I. I. (2015). Information Era: Global Transformation of the Cultural Space. Visnyk NTUU «KPI». Filosofiya. Psykholohiya. Pedahohika, 2? 98-104 [in Ukrainian].
Shakirova, E.Yu. (2014). Mosaic of modern socio-cultural space. Vestnik VEGU, 1 (69), 140– 147 [in Russian].
Shakirova, E. Yu. (2013). General idea of the structure and dynamics of the modern socio-cultural space. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Filosofiya, 2, 108-124 [in Russian].
Suarez-Villa, L. (2016). Globalization and Technocapitalism The Political Economy of Corporate Power and Technological Domination. New York: Routledge [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
