Museum in negative discourse of modernization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.153021Keywords:
modernization, demodernization, museum, museology, Mystetskyi Arsenal, O. Chervonik, O. Ostrovska-Luta, social and cultural function of the museum.Abstract
The purpose of the article. To find out the role of the museum in the negative discourse of modernization. Methodology. Deductive logic when checking out the premises, which lay on the basis conclusion, that the concept of modernization denotes negative social phenomena. Scientific novelty. It has been found out that the discourse of negative modernization includes the substitution of concepts: the notion of modernization is marked by pseudo-modernization processes. Within this discourse, the museum itself appears as an object of pseudo-modernization. Conclusions. The concept of «modernization» is ambiguous. On the one hand, modernization refers to utopian social projects of rebuilding of the entire society (the largest among them was the Soviet one). Thus, in practice, we have seeing fragmentary reorganization with unexpected negative consequences, in particular, with trends towards degradation. All this, in fact, is pseudo-modernization. The concept of «modernization» also refers to a gradual move forward based on trials and errors when innovations undergo comprehensive testing and verification, while traditionalist tendencies are also strong. In this case, true modernization is the evolutionary development of civilization, when modern project don’t build in empty place, but creatively re-think and improve the historical and cultural achievements. It is unacceptable to combine utopian and piecemeal engineering (Popper's terminology) in one concept. Transformation museums into a hub, coworking, etc. is example of utopian engineering. But if we lay on basis concept of modernization regarded to piecemeal engineering, we saving museums from destroying, and these institutions can be a good tools for positive modernization of society.
References
Cameron D.F. The Museum, a Temple of the Forum. Curator. 1971. Issue 1. P. 11–24.
Аджемоглу Д., Робинсон Д.А. Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные [Електронний ресурс] М., 2016. Файл (.fb2).
Восленский М.С. Номенклатура. Господствующий класс Советского Союза. Лондон., 1990. 671 с.
Латур Б. Нового времени не было. Эссе по симметричной антропологии. Спб., 2006. 238 с.
Маньковська Р.В. Музеї України у суспільно-історичних викликах ХХ – поч. ХХІ ст. Львів, 2016. 408 с.
Островська-Люта О.Б. Суспільна спроможність: випадок Арсеналу // Korydor. URL: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/suspilna-spromozhnist-mystetskyi-arsenal.html (дата звернення: 01.08.2018).
Поппер К. Відкрите суспільство і його вороги. К., 1994. Т.1. 444 с.
Стратегія Національного культурно-мистецького та музейного комплексу «Мистецький Арсенал» // Artarsenal.in.ua. URL: https://artarsenal.in.ua/uk/strategiya-rozvitku-kopleksu/ (дата звернення: 01.08.2018).
Хадсон К. Влиятельные музеи. Новосибирск, 2001. 192 с.
Червоник О. Арсенальний модернізм. // Korydor. URL: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/arsenalnyi-modernizm.html (дата звернення: 01.08.2018).
Шола Т. Вечность здесь больше не живет. Толковый словарь музейных грехов. Тула, 2013. 360 с.
Cameron, D.F. (1971). The Museum, a Temple of the Forum. Curator. 1, 11-24 [in English].
Ajemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). Why some countries are rich, and others are poor. The Origin of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Retrieved from offline resource (.fb2) [in Russian].
Voslensky, M.S. (1990). Nomenklatura. The Ruling Class in the Soviet Union. London [in Russian].
Latour, B. (2006). There was no new time. Essay on symmetric anthropology. St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Manjkovsjka, R.V. (2016). Museums of Ukraine in the socio-historical challenges in XX – beginning XXI century. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Ostrovska-Luta, O.B. Public Ability: Case of Arsenal. Retrieved from: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/suspilna-spromozhnist-mystetskyi-arsenal.html (application date: 01/08/2018) [in Ukrainian].
Popper, K. (1994). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Strategy of the National Cultural-Artistic and Museums Complex "Mystetskyi Arsenal". Retrieved from: https://artarsenal.in.ua/en/strategiya-rozvitku-kopleksu/ (Applying Date: 08/01/2018) [in Ukrainian].
Hudson, K. (2001). Museums of Influence. Novosibirsk [in Russian].
Chervonik, O. Arsenal Modernism. Retrieved from: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/arsenalnyi-modernizm.html (application date: 01/08/2018) [in Ukrainian].
Shola, T. (2013). Eternity does not live here anymore. A glossary of museum sins. Tula [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).