Museum in negative discourse of modernization

Authors

  • Serhii Rudenko Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.153021

Keywords:

modernization, demodernization, museum, museology, Mystetskyi Arsenal, O. Chervonik, O. Ostrovska-Luta, social and cultural function of the museum.

Abstract

The purpose of the article. To find out the role of the museum in the negative discourse of modernization. Methodology. Deductive logic when checking out the premises, which lay on the basis conclusion, that the concept of modernization denotes negative social phenomena. Scientific novelty. It has been found out that the discourse of negative modernization includes the substitution of concepts: the notion of modernization is marked by pseudo-modernization processes. Within this discourse, the museum itself appears as an object of pseudo-modernization. Conclusions. The concept of «modernization» is ambiguous. On the one hand, modernization refers to utopian social projects of rebuilding of the entire society (the largest among them was the Soviet one). Thus, in practice, we have seeing fragmentary reorganization with unexpected negative consequences, in particular, with trends towards degradation. All this, in fact, is pseudo-modernization. The concept of «modernization» also refers to a gradual move forward based on trials and errors when innovations undergo comprehensive testing and verification, while traditionalist tendencies are also strong. In this case, true modernization is the evolutionary development of civilization, when modern project don’t build in empty place, but creatively re-think and improve the historical and cultural achievements. It is unacceptable to combine utopian and piecemeal engineering (Popper's terminology) in one concept. Transformation museums into a hub, coworking, etc. is example of utopian engineering. But if we lay on basis concept of modernization regarded to piecemeal engineering, we saving museums from destroying, and these institutions can be a good tools for positive modernization of society.

Author Biography

Serhii Rudenko, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts

Phd in Culturology (Cultural Studies), Doctor of science degree applicant

References

Cameron D.F. The Museum, a Temple of the Forum. Curator. 1971. Issue 1. P. 11–24.

Аджемоглу Д., Робинсон Д.А. Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные [Електронний ресурс] М., 2016. Файл (.fb2).

Восленский М.С. Номенклатура. Господствующий класс Советского Союза. Лондон., 1990. 671 с.

Латур Б. Нового времени не было. Эссе по симметричной антропологии. Спб., 2006. 238 с.

Маньковська Р.В. Музеї України у суспільно-історичних викликах ХХ – поч. ХХІ ст. Львів, 2016. 408 с.

Островська-Люта О.Б. Суспільна спроможність: випадок Арсеналу // Korydor. URL: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/suspilna-spromozhnist-mystetskyi-arsenal.html (дата звернення: 01.08.2018).

Поппер К. Відкрите суспільство і його вороги. К., 1994. Т.1. 444 с.

Стратегія Національного культурно-мистецького та музейного комплексу «Мистецький Арсенал» // Artarsenal.in.ua. URL: https://artarsenal.in.ua/uk/strategiya-rozvitku-kopleksu/ (дата звернення: 01.08.2018).

Хадсон К. Влиятельные музеи. Новосибирск, 2001. 192 с.

Червоник О. Арсенальний модернізм. // Korydor. URL: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/arsenalnyi-modernizm.html (дата звернення: 01.08.2018).

Шола Т. Вечность здесь больше не живет. Толковый словарь музейных грехов. Тула, 2013. 360 с.

Cameron, D.F. (1971). The Museum, a Temple of the Forum. Curator. 1, 11-24 [in English].

Ajemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). Why some countries are rich, and others are poor. The Origin of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Retrieved from offline resource (.fb2) [in Russian].

Voslensky, M.S. (1990). Nomenklatura. The Ruling Class in the Soviet Union. London [in Russian].

Latour, B. (2006). There was no new time. Essay on symmetric anthropology. St. Petersburg [in Russian].

Manjkovsjka, R.V. (2016). Museums of Ukraine in the socio-historical challenges in XX – beginning XXI century. Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Ostrovska-Luta, O.B. Public Ability: Case of Arsenal. Retrieved from: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/suspilna-spromozhnist-mystetskyi-arsenal.html (application date: 01/08/2018) [in Ukrainian].

Popper, K. (1994). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Strategy of the National Cultural-Artistic and Museums Complex "Mystetskyi Arsenal". Retrieved from: https://artarsenal.in.ua/en/strategiya-rozvitku-kopleksu/ (Applying Date: 08/01/2018) [in Ukrainian].

Hudson, K. (2001). Museums of Influence. Novosibirsk [in Russian].

Chervonik, O. Arsenal Modernism. Retrieved from: http://www.korydor.in.ua/ua/opinions/arsenalnyi-modernizm.html (application date: 01/08/2018) [in Ukrainian].

Shola, T. (2013). Eternity does not live here anymore. A glossary of museum sins. Tula [in Russian].

Published

2018-11-27

Issue

Section

Культурологія