INFORMATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: CULTUROLOGICAL DIMENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2018.159757Keywords:
cultural studies, society, informational enviroment, communication, information space, transforma-tion of society.Abstract
Purpose of Research. The purpose of the article is to analyse the interpretations of the meaning of the infor-mational enviroment in the culturological conceptions of the philosophers of XX century. Methodology. The methodology of the article is based on the interdisciplinary approach, which involves various scientific methods such as the analysis (to reveal the main elements of the information environment), the comparative method (to find out the peculiarities of the interpretation of the information environment in the concepts of P. Sorokin, E. Toynbee, N. Danilevsky, L. White and B. Malinovsky). Basing on art criticism and cultural approaches, the author determines the role of the informational envi-ronment in society. Scientific Novelty. The scientific novelty of the article is the analysis and generalization of the main interpretations of the information environment in the culturological conceptions of philosophers of XX century (P. Sorokin, E. Toynbee, B. Malinovsky, etc.). Conclusions. Thus, it was established that the information environment as a way of reflection and internalization of cultural values was developed in the culturological concepts of ethnographers, culturolo-gists and philosophers of the twentieth century. It is the part of the socio-cultural space and the basis of a communicative field, which is characterized by transbordery, interactivity and mobility.
References
Адорно Т. Исследования авторитарной личности. – М.: Серебряные нити, 2001. – 416 с.
Апель К.-О. Дискурс і відповідальність : проблема переходу до постконвенціональної моралі. [пер. з нім. В. Купліна]. – К. : Дух і Літера, 2009. – 430 с. (Сучасна гуманітарна бібліотека)
Кургинян С. Седьмой сценарий. Часть 2 : После путча / Сергей Кургинян. – М. : Экспериментальный творческий центр, 1992. – С. 141.
Маркузе Г. Эрос и цивилизация. Одномерный человек : Исследования идеологии развитого индуст-риального общества / Г. Маркузе. – М. : АСТ, 2003. – 526 с.
Михайлин І. Л. Основи журналістики : підручник / І. Л. Михайлин. – К. : Центр учбової літератури, 2011. – 496 с.
Михайлов В. А. Особенности развития информационно-коммуникативной среды современного об-щества / В. А. Михайлов, С. В. Михайлов // Актуальные проблемы теории коммуникации : сборник научных трудов. – СПб : Изд-во СПб ГУ, 2004. – С. 34–52.
Петрик В. М. Сучасні технології та засоби маніпулювання свідомістю, ведення інформаційних війн і спеціальних інформаційних операцій / В. М. Петрик, О. А. Штоквиш, В. І. Полевий. – К. : Росава, 2006. – 208 с.
Попович М. В. Раціональність і виміри людського буття / М. В. Попович. – К. : Сфера, 1997. – 292 с.
Робертсон Р. Globalization. Social Theory and Global Culture / Роланд Робертсон // Глобальні модерності [за ред. Майка Фезерстоуна, Скота Леша та Роланда Робертсона]. – К. : Ніка-Центр, 2013. – 399 с.
Розлогов К. Е. Мистецтво екрана : проблеми виразності / К. Е. Розлогов. – М., 1982.
Силачев Д. А. Семиотика и искусство : анализ западных концепций / Д. А. Силачев. – М. : Знание, 1991. – 64 с.
Социальная философия Франкфуртской школы / [Фоглер Я. Г., Ойзерман Т. И. и др.] ; под ред. Бес-сонова Б. Н., Нарского И. С., Яковлева М. В. – М. : Мысль ; Прага : Свобода, 1978. – 357 с.
Фарман И. П. Социо-культурные проекты Ю. Хабармаса / И. П. Фарман. – М. : Наука, 1999. – 188 с.
Федякин И. А. Общественное сознание и массовая коммуникация в буржуазном обществе / И. А. Федякин. – М. : Наука, 1988. – 216 с.
Фромм Е. Анатомия человеческой деструктивности / Е. Фромм. – М. : АСТ, 2006. – 635 с.
Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие / Ю. Хабермас. – СПб. : Наука, 2000. – 280 с.
Хиггинс Р. Седьмой враг. Человеческий фактор в глобальном кризисе / Р. Хиггинс // Глобальные проблемы и общечеловеческие ценности. – М. : Прогресс, 1990. – С. 26–27.
Ferguson M. The mythology about globalization / M. Ferguson // European Journal of Communication. – № 7.
Hall S. The local and the global : globalization and ethnicity / S. Hall // Culture, Globalization and the World-System [ed. A. D. King]. – London : Macmillan.
Kopiyevska O. The transformation of subjectivity in the cultural practices of Ukraine // Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. – 2017. – No 1. – С. 34–38.
Sorokin, P. Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law and Social Relationships. Boston: Extending Horizons Books, 1970. – 345 c.
Toynbee, A.-J. A Study of History. Режим доступу: http://nobsword.blogspot.com/1993_10_17_nobswordarchive.html.
Adorno T. (2001). The Authoritarian Personality. Moscow: Serebrynnye niti [in Russian].
Apel K. (2009). Discourse and Responsibility: the Problem of Transition to Postconventional Morality. (V. Kuplin, Trans.). Kyiv: Dukh I Litera [in Ukrainian].
Kurginyan, S. (1992). The Seventh Scenario. Part 2: After the putsch. Moscow: Experimental tvorcheskiy centr [in Russian].
Marcuse, H. (2003). Eros and Civilization. A One-Dimensional Man: Research on the Ideology of a Devel-oped Industrial Society. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
Mikhailin, I. L. (2011). Fundamentals of Journalism. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature [in Ukrainian].
Mikhailov, V. A. & Mikhailov, S. V. (2004). Features of the Development of the Informational and Communica-tive Environment of a Modern Society. Actual Problems of Communication Theory. SPb: St. Petersburg State University [in Russian].
Petryk, V. M. & Shtockvysh, O. A. & Polyevyi, V.I. (2006). Modern Technologies and Means of Manipulation of Consciousness, Conducting of Informational Wars and Special Informational Operations. Kyiv: Rosava [in Ukrainian].
Popovych, M. (1997). Rationality and Dimensions of Human Being. Kyiv: Sphere [in Ukrainian].
Robertson, R. (2013). Globalization. Social Theory and Global Culture. Global Modernities. Kyiv: Nika-Centr [in Russian].
Rozgolov, K. E. (1982). The Art of the Screen: Problems of Expressiveness. Moscow [in Russian].
Silachev, D.A. (1991). Semiotics and Art: An Analysis of Western Concepts Moscow: Znanie [in Russian].
Bessonova, B. N. (Eds.). (1978). Social Philosophy of the Frankfurt School. Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
Farman, I. P. (1999). Socio-Cultural Projects of J. Habermas. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Fedyakin, I. A. (1988). Public Consciousness and Mass Communication in the Bourgeois Society. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Fromm, E. (2006). Anatomy of Human Destruction. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
Habermas, J. (2000). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. St. Petersburg: Nauka [in Russian].
Higgins, R. (1990). The Seventh Enemy. The Human Factor in the Global Crisis. Global Problems and Uni-versal Human Values. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
Ferguson, M. (n.d.). The Mythology of Globalization. European Journal of Communication, 7 [in English].
Hall, S. (n.d.). The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity. Culture, Globalization and the World-System. A. D. King (Ed.). London: Macmillan [in English].
Kopiyevskaya O. (2017). The transformation of subjectivity in the cultural practices of Ukraine. Visnyk Na-tionalnoi academii Kerivnyh kadriv kultury i mystectv, 1. 34 – 38 [in English].
Sorokin, P. (1970). Social and Cultural Dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law and Social Relationships. Boston: Extending Horizons Books [in English].
Toynbee, A.-J. (1993). A Study of History. Retrieved from http://nobsword.blogspot.com/ 1993_10_17_ nobsword_archive.html [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
