The show as a component of modern culture: the formulation of the problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2018.160494Keywords:
mass culture, spectacle, modern spectacular culture, mass theatrical performances, visualityAbstract
Objective: systematization of existing works on the problem of spectacle, as well as revealing features of the spectacle in the conditions of modern culture. Methodology. The methodological basis of the research is the general scientific principles of systematization and generalization of the problem under study, as well as an interdisciplinary approach that allows studying the problem under study with the wide involvement of scientific works of various branches of knowledge, in particular philosophy, cultural studies, art studies and sociology of culture. Scientific novelty of research. The vast majority of shows serves commercial or socio-political goals, not contributing to the growth of spirituality. However, modern realities require that the spectacle play an important role of elevating and asserting spirituality, supporting traditions and values, contributing to the renewal and revival of culture. The novelty of the work is to justify the opinion that the spectacle allows us to unite the masses of people on the basis of a single cultural tradition, and also - to attach disparate individuals to eternal values. Conclusions. Modern entertainment culture, on the one hand, is aimed at emotional and entertaining pleasure of participants and spectators, and on the other hand, it can be argued that the development of spectacular culture is determined by the appearance of the director and the use of theatrical elements and the use of modern innovative media technologies whose development in a certain degree due to the development of spectacular culture. The multifunctionality of the modern spectacle encourages the creative search of specialists involved in the creation of mass actions, sometimes performs not only entertaining, but also educational function, cognitive and even art-therapeutic.
References
Sight. Modern Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language: 65,000 words (2006), Kharkiv : School Publishing House, 112. [in Ukrainian].
Guyot, J.M. (1900). Art from the sociological point of view, St. Petersburg: Typography People's benefit [in Russian].
Davydov, A. A. (2014). "Spectacle" and "entertainment": to clarify concepts. Philosophy. Culturology: Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 1(33), 135-140 [in Russian].
Logvinova, O.O. Trends in the transformation of theatrical genres and forms of modern spectacle culture. Retrieved from: http://www.visnik.org/pdf/v2014-07-17-logvinova.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Stanislavskaya, K.I. (2013). The artist and spectator: a view on the relationship in the modes of postmodern spectacular culture. Scientific Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Theater, Cinema and Television named after. I. K. Karpenko-Karyi, 13, 180-189 [in Ukrainian].
Khrenov, N. A. Interaction of spectacular and visual forms in modern culture. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vzaimodeystvie-zrelischnyh-i-vizualnyh-form-v-sovremennoy-kulture [in Russian].
Chmil, G. P. (2013). Visualization of the real in the modern cultural space: Monograph, Kyiv: Institute of Cultural Studies, NAMU [in Ukrainian].
Shubina, I. B. (2005). Spectacle in culture. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Rostov-on-Don [in Russian].
Видовище // Сучасний тлумачний словник української мови : 65 000 слів / За заг. ред. д-ра філол. на-ук, проф. В. В. Дубчинського. – Х. : ВД "ШКОЛА", 2006. С. 112.
Гюйо Ж. М. Искусство с социологической точки зрения / Жан Мари Гюйо, 1900, СПб. : Типография тов-ва "Народная польза" 462 с.
Давыдов А. А. "Зрелище" и "зрелищность": к прояснению понятий / А. А. Давыдов // Философия. Культурология : Вестник Нижегородского университета имен Н. Лобачевского. Серия : Социальные науки, 2014. № 1 (33). – С. 135-140.
Логвінова О. О. Тенденції трансформації театралізованих жанрів та форм сучасної видовищної куль-тури / О. О. Логвінова // [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу : http://www.visnik.org/pdf/v2014-07-17-logvinova.pdf.
Станіславська К. І. Митець і глядач: погляд на взаємини у модусах постмодерністської видовищної культури / К. І. Станіславська // Науковий вісник Київського національного університету театру, кіно і телебачення ім. І. К. Карпенка-Карого. 2013. Вип. 13. С. 180-189.
Хренов Н. А. Взаимодействие зрелищных и визуальных форм в современной культуре / Н. А. Хренов[Электронный ресурс] – Режим доступа : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vzaimodeystvie-zrelischnyh-i-vizualnyh-form-v-sovremennoy-kulture.
Чміль Г. П. Візуалізація реального в сучасному культурному просторі : Монографія / Чміль Г., Кораб-льова Н. – К. : Ін-т культурології НАМУ, 2013. – 256 с.
Шубина И. Б. Зрелище в культуре : автореф. дис. … канд. филос. наук : спец. 09.00.13 "Религиоведе-ние, философская антропология, философия культуры" / И. Б. Шубина. – Ростов-на-Дону, 2005. – 16 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).