The problem of understanding the concept of Andre Malraux's "Imaginary museum"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2018.161852Keywords:
Malraux, a museum without walls, imaginary museum, museum craft, museum art, the technology of museum craft, the identity of the museum.Abstract
Purpose of the article. To find out the central issue of Malraux's "Imaginary museum". Methodology. Historiographical analysis. Scientific novelty. This research overcomes stereotypes in interpretation of Malraux's "Imaginary museum". It isn't metaphysic opus of eccentric writer. It is serious conceptualization of museum craft. Conclusions. Bazin, Krauss and other researchers don't understand completely, what Malraux's "Imaginary museum" means. Malraux wanted to approve his opinion on history of art. For this he decided to change museum representation of art history. The side effect of this investigation – successful technology of museum craft. It's also a side effect of his writer talent. That is why Malraux "miss" his invention in this museum field. Because, museum craft is organically to Malraux. Unfortunately, Malraux had not suggested the scientific theory of museum craft, but further scientific research of his technology necessary to create thistheory.
References
Bazin G. The museum age. New York. 1967. 304p.
Henning M. Museums, media and cultural theory. Glasgow, 2006. 183p.
Krauss R.E. Postmodernism’s museum without walls // Thinking about exhibitions. London, New York, 1996. P.241–245.
Krauss R.E. The Cultural Logic of the Late Capitalist Museum // October. Vol. 54 (Autumn, 1990). P.3–17.
Malraux A. Voices of Silence. 1974. 679p.
Базен Ж. История истории искусства: от Вазари до наших дней. М., 1994. 528с.
Балаш А.Н. "Голоса безмолвия" Андре Мальро и проблема подлинности произведения искусства // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение. 2017. № 26. С.19–32.
Бирюкова М.В. Музей воображаемый vs музей реальный: концепции гипотетических музеев второй половины ХХ века // Международный журнал исследований культуры. 2016. 3 (24). P.85-95.
Вайдахер Ф. Загальна музеологія. Львів, 2005. 630с.
Захарченко И.Н. Воображаемый музей Мальро в пространстве современной культуры // Мир музея. 2008. № 4. С.32-35.
Захарченко И.Н. Воображаемый музей: А. Мальро о судьбах искусства в современной культуре // Вопросы культурологи. № 10. 2008. С.59–62.
Калугина Т.П. Художественный музей как феномен культуры. СПб, 2001. 224с.
Краусс Р. Подлинность авангарда и другие модернистские мифы. М., 2003. 318с.
Куклинова И.А. А. Мальро и Б. Делош: взгляд на природу художественного музея // Труды Санкт-Петербургского государственного института культуры. 2015. Т. 212. Музей в мире культуры. Мир культуры в музее. С.56–66.
Куклинова И.А. Интерпретация феномена художественного музея франкоязычными мыслителями XX века // Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2014. № 4 (42): в 2-х ч. Ч. II. C.115-119.
Куклинова И.А. Концепция воображаемого музея в трудах Розалинды Краусс // Вестник Томского го-сударственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение. 2017. № 25. С.156–163.
Мальро А. Голоса безмолвия. СПб., 2012. 873с.
Шуберт К. Удел куратора. Концепция музея от Великой французской революции до наших дней. М.,2016. 224с.
Шман С. Проблеми стандартизації діяльності музеїв. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів ку-льтури і мистецтв. 2015. № 1. К.: Міленіум. С.55-59
Balash, A.N. (2017). The Voices of Silence of Andre Malraux and the problem of authenticity of a work of art. Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History, 26, 19–32 [in Russian]
Bazin, G. (1967). The museum age. New York: UniverseBooks
Bazin, G. (1994). The History of history of Art: from Vasari to nowadays. Moscow: Progress [in Russian]
Biryukova, M. (2016). Imaginary Museum vs Real Museum: Concepts of Hypothetical Museums in the Second Half of the 20th Century. International Journal of Cultural Research, 3 (24), 85-95 [in Russian]
Henning, M. (2006). Museums, media and cultural theory, Glasgow: Open UniversityPress
Kalugina, T.P. (2001). Art museum as cultural phenomenon. Saint-Peterburg: Petropolis [in Russian]
Krauss, R.E. (1990). The Cultural Logic of the Late Capitalist Museum. October, 54 (Autumn),3–17
Krauss, R.E. (1996). Postmodernism’s museum without walls. Thinking about exhibitions,241–245
Krauss, R.E. (2003). The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Мoscow: Hudozhestvennyiy zhurnal [in Russian]
Kuklinova, I.A. (2014). Interpretation of phenomenon of art gallery by French-speaking thinkers of the XX century. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, 4 (42), 115-119 [in Russian]
Kuklinova, I.A. (2015). Malraux and B. Deloche: viewpoint on the genesis of art museum. The works of Saint-Peterburg State University of Culture and Arts, 212, 56–66 [in Russian]
Kuklinova, I.A. (2017). The concept of museum without walls in the research of Rosalind Krauss. Tomsk State University Journal of CulturalStudies and Art History, 25, 156–163 [in Russian]
Malraux, A. (1974). Voices of Silence. New York:Paladin.
Malraux, A. (2012). Voices of Silence. Saint-Peterburg: Nauka [in Russian]
Shubert, K. (2016). The curator's Egg. The concept of the museum from the Great French Revolution to the present day. Moscow: Ad Marginem [in Russian]
Waidacher, F. (2005). Common museology. Lviv: Litopys [in Ukrainian]
Zakharchenko, I.N. (2008). Imaginary museum of Malraux in the space of modern culture. World of Museum, 4, 32–35 [in Russian]
Zakharchenko, I.N. (2008). Imaginary museum: A. Malraux on destiny of art in modern culture. Issues of cultural studies, 10, 59–62 [in Russian]
Shman, S. (2015). Problems of Standardization of Museums' Activities. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv Kyiv: Millennium. 1, 55-59 [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
