The communicative potential of international tourism: cultural integration and identification

Authors

  • Serhii Krasovskyi assistant to the chair of hotel and restaurant business, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2018.162493

Keywords:

international tourism, tourist, communication, integration, culture, Identity

Abstract

Purpose of Research. The purpose of the article is to analyse the peculiarities of the communicative potential of the international tourism in the context of its ability to influence the processes of cultural integration and identification. Methodology. The methodology of the research is based on the interdisciplinary combination of methodological tools of cultural studies, sociology, psychology, communicative sciences. In addition, the author uses various methods such as analysis, synthesis, interpretation, etc. Scientific Novelty. Theinternational tourism influence on the processes of cultural integration and formation of identity in conditions of cross-cultural interaction are analysed. Conclusions. Contacting and comparing with the representatives of the other sociocultural systems, a tourist finds out their features, characteristics of their mentality, the peculiarities of everyday life. So, the tourist gets new knowledge about other nations and study his own cultural and social nature. Thus, the individual forms his/her identity by the interaction with other people, based on his/her mentality and life experience. In addition, the international tourism, which has the ability to change both social and cultural priorities, virtually forms the "Homo Viator's " skills to reconcile interests with the representatives of other cultures by the involving in the consolidated activities of various processes. The latter becomes an effective instrument to resolve conflicts and a pledge of peaceful coexistence and interaction of various cultural worlds that develop a global informational civilizationtogether.

Author Biography

Serhii Krasovskyi, assistant to the chair of hotel and restaurant business

Kiev National University of Culture and Arts

 

References

Бауман 3. Глобализация. Последствия для человека и общества / Пер. с англ. Москва: Весь Мир, 2004. 188с.

Березницкая Н.Л. Туризм как фактор межкультурной коммуникации: автореф. дис. … канд. культурол. наук: 24.00.04; СПб.,1999.

Бодрийяр Ж. Прозрачность зла / пер. с франц. Л. Либарской, Е. Марковской. Москва : Добросвет.Изд-во КДУ, 2009. 258c.

Ван Дейк Т.А. Язык. Познание. Коммуникация. Москва,1989.

Глобальний етичний кодекс туризму. URL:http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/983_001.

Поликарпова Е. В. Культурные основы high-hume технологий / Гуманитарные и социальные науки. 2008. № 6. С.33–38.

Слободенюк Е. В. Туризм як чинник гуманізації відносин між народами: автореф. дис. … на здоб. на-ук. ступ. к. філос. наук. Київ,2003.

Страны и города, которыми наиболее интересуются украинцы после введения безвизового режима с ЕС.URL: https://ru.tsn.ua/tourism/opredeleny-samye-populyarnye-marshruty-ukraincev-posle-vvedeniya-bezvizu-885430.html.

Філософія туризму. Київ: Кондор, 2004. 268с.

Хейзинга Й. Homo ludens. Человек играющий. СПб.: Изд-во Ивана Лимбаха, 2011. 416с.

Чешко В. Ф., Глазко В. И. High Hume (биовласть и биополитика в обществе риска). Учебное пособие. Москва, 2009. 319с.

Божко Л. Нові напрями в туризмі як культурні наслідки глобалізації /Вісник Національної академії ке-рівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2015. Вип. 4. С.3-8.

Cultural Shock. A reader in modern cultural anthropology/ Ed. by Ph. K. Bock. New York,1970.

Samovar L., Porter R., McDaniel E., Roy C. Communication Between Cultures. Belmont, 2013. 432p.

Ward G., Bochner St., Furuham R. The psychology of Cultural shock. Second Education. Part 6: Tourists. Philadelphia, by Routledge,2001.

Baumann, Z. (2004). Globalization. Consequences for people and society / Per. from english Moscow: All World [in Russian].

Bereznitskaya, N. (1999). Tourism as a factor of intercultural communication: author's abstract. dis ... Candidate Cultivol Sciences: 24.00.04; St. Petersburg [in Russian].

Baudrillard, J. (2009). Transparency of evil / per. from french L. Lybarskaya, E. Markovskaya. Moscow: Good-bye. The publication of the KSU, 2009 [in Russian].

Van Dyke T.A. (1989). The language Cognition Communication Moscow.

The Global Ethic Code for Tourism. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/983_001 [inUkrainian].

Polikarpova E. (2008). Cultural Foundations of High-Hume Technologies / Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, 33-38 [inRussian].

Slobodenyuk, E. (2003). Tourism as a factor in the humanization of relations between peoples: author's abstract. dis ... to bake sciences step k. filos sciences Kyiv [inUkrainian].

Countries and cities that are most interested in Ukrainians after the introduction of a visa-free regime with the EU. URL: https://ru.tsn.ua/tourism/opredeleny-samye-populyarnye-marshruty-ukraincev-posle-vvedeniya-bezvizu-885430.html.

Philosophy of tourism. Kyiv: Condor, 2004 [inUkrainian].

Heising, J. (2011). Homo ludens. Man playing St. Petersburg: Izv-i Ivan Limbach [in Russian].

Cheško, V., Glazko, V. (2009). High Hume (Bivility and biopolitics in a society of risk). Tutorial. Moscow [in Russian].

Bozhko, L. (2015). New trends in tourism as a cultural consequences of globalization National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 4, 3-8. [inUkrainian].

Cultural Shock. A reader in modern cultural anthropology / Ed. by Ph. K. Bock. New York, 1970 [inEnglish].

Samovar,L.,Porter,R.,McDaniel,E.,Roy,C.(2013).CommunicationBetweenCultures.Belmont [in English].

Ward,G.,Bochner,St.,Furuham,R.(2001).ThepsychologyofCulturalshock.SecondeducationPart6: Tourists. Philadelphia, by Routledge. [in English].

Published

2018-04-24

Issue

Section

Культурологія