The phenomenon of “genius” in the art (synergetic models)

Authors

  • Viktoriya Poliuha Drohobych State Pedagogical Ivan Franko University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2018.162730

Keywords:

genius, art, synergetics, creativity, giftedness.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is a comprehensive, synergetic analysis of the phenomenon of “genius” in art. Methodology of the research is due to the multidisciplinary approach, which involves the use of general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and synthesis of the phenomenon of “genius” in the context of understanding the synergetic modelsin psychoanalysis, ideology, pedagogy, philosophy with art; semiotic and anthropological approach to comprehension of synergetic models, allowed to consider the interconnection and transformation of the phenomenon of “genius” and its expressioninart. Thescientificnoveltyliesinanewperspectiveonthestudyof synergeticmodelsofthephenomenonof “genius” as a polysymmetric definition in the aspect of anthropological measurement of art. The new is the comprehension of anthropological problems, tendencies, and aspiration store vealthecreative potential of the individual. Conclusions. The study of the phenomenon of “genius” in art led to the isolation of synergetic models associated with the understanding of the creative personality as a manifestation of a particular worldview, a way of interaction with reality, the ability to reveal, express and convey to the world. The conceptual orientation to solving a given problem is reduced to the assumption that mental non-standard, disturbance of equilibrium at any personal level is manifested in an artistic act, where genius is controlled in sanity and the ability to express exits beyond the standard or fatigueactively.

Author Biography

Viktoriya Poliuha, Drohobych State Pedagogical Ivan Franko University

Ph.D.(Philosophy), Associate Professor, Methods of Music Education and Conducting Department

References

Аверкина Е.И. Фридрих Ницше о здоровье человека [Текст] / Елена Ивановна Аверкина // Аспирантский вестник Поволжья. – Самара, 2009. –С.11-15

Булатов М.О. Філософський словник [Текст ]/ М.О.Булатов. – К. : Стилос, 2009. –575с.

Гарин И. Непризнаные гении. Гениальность как болезнь. Ф.Ницше [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим дос-тупу:https://proza.ru/2013/02/01/1113.

Гегель. Энциклопедия философских наук. Философия духа [Текст ]/ Отв. ред. Е. П. Ситковский. Ред.коллегия: Б. М. Кедров и др. – М.: Мысль, 1977. – Т.З. –471с.

Даниленко О.И. Душевное здоровье в контексте культуры: автореф. дис. на соискание научной степе-ни докт. культурологических наук: спец. 24.00.01 “Культурология”/ Ольга Ивановна Даниленко. – Санкт-Петербург, 2000. –58с.

Ильин Е. П. Психология творчества, креативности, одаренности [Текст] / Е.Ильин. – СПб.: Питер,2009.– 448 с.

ЛамброзоЧ.Гениальностьипомешательство[Текст]/ЧезареЛамброзо.–Минск,2000,ООО“Попурри”. – 576с.

Маслоу А. Дальние пределы человеческой психики / Маслоу Абрахам Гарольд // Перев. с англ. А. М. Татлыбаевой. Научи, ред., вступ. статья и коммент. Н. Н. Акулиной. – СПб.: Евразия, 1999. –432с.

Фрейд 3. Мотив выбора ларца / Зигмунд Фрейд // Художник и фантазирование. – М, 1995. –С.212-217

ФукоМ. История безумия в классическую епоху/ М.Фуко// СПб.: Университетская книга.–1997. 576с.

MaslowA.H.Self-Actualization and Beyond/ A.H.Maslow// ChallengesofHumanisticPsychology.Mc Grow Hill, Inc., 1967. – P.279-286.

Яковлев О. Синергетичний дискурс культуротворчих процесів у сучасній Україні. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2016.№ 1. К.: Міленіум.С.29-32

Averkina, E.I. (2009) Friedrich Nietzsche about human health. Postgraduate Student of the Volga Region, Samara, (pp. 11-15) [in Russian].

Bulatov, M.O. (2009) Philosophical Dictionary, Kyiv: Stylos, (p. 575) [in Ukrainian].

Garin, I. (2013). Unrecognized geniuses. Genius as a disease. F.Nietzsche. Retrieved from https://proza.ru/2013/02/01/1113 [in Russian].

Hegel. (1977). Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Philosophy of the Spirit. E.P. Sitkovsky. (Ed.), B.M. Kedrov (Eds.) et al., Moscow, Thought, 3, (p. 471) [inRussian].

Danilenko, O.I. (2000). Mental health in the context of culture. Extendet abstract of doctor’s thesis. St. Petersburg [in Russian].

Ilyin, E.P. (2009). Psychology of creativity, creativity, giftedness. St. Petersburg: Peter [in Russian].

Lambroso, Ch. (2000). The genius and insanity, Minsk, Open Company “Popourri” [inRussian].

Maslow, A. (1999).The Far Limits of the Human Psyche. (A. M. Tatlybaeva, Trans). N. N. Akulina (Ed), St. Petersburg: Eurasia [in Russian].

Freud, S. (1995). Motive for choosing a casket. Artist and fantasy, Moscow, (pp. 212-217) [in Russian].

Foucault, M. (1997). The history of insanity in the classical era, St. Petersburg: University Book [in Russian].

Maslow, A.H. (1967). Self-Actualization and Beyond. Challenges of Humanistic Psychology. Mc Grow Hill, Inc., (pp. 279-286) [in English].

Yakovlev, O. (2016). Synergetic discourse of cultural processes in modern Ukraine. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv Kyiv: Millennium, 1, 29-32 [in Ukraine].

Published

2018-04-24

Issue

Section

Мистецтвознавство