IMPERATIVE FUNCTION OF AESTHETIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166526Keywords:
aesthetic imperative, fiction art, spirituality, beauty, economic expediency, quasi-beauty, culture.Abstract
The purpose of the study is to consider the concept of aesthetic imperative as an effective mechanism for “reformatting” a person, awakening his soul in a contemporary deformed cultural space. The methodology of the study. In the article the following methods are used: the comparative and historical method, which allows to consider the existing approaches to the definition of the ontological essence of aesthetic imperativeness in human life; the pragmatic method, which is used for extrapolation of aesthetic expediency into economic expediency; the dialectical method, which makes it possible to consider the aesthetic and economic expediencies in interconnection; the phenomenological method is associated with the peculiarities of manifestation of aesthetic imperativeness based on concrete examples derived from the classical literature and the method of abstraction, which allows us to investigate the otherness of aesthetic imperativeness in postmodernism. The scientific novelty. The study of aesthetic imperativeness in human life activity is carried out and the approaches to its study based on the analysis of classical literature are outlined, and to the aesthetic thesaurus there is proposed a concept of quasi-beauty as a kind of aesthetic phenomenon in the structure of human life activity, that is subordinated to the logic of economic or consumer expediency. Conclusions. Without pretending to comprehensive study of all the issues related to the subject, this study intended to draw attention to the problems of aesthetic imperativeness. We have found that various social phenomena as manifestations of human activity appear in the form of unconscious need: they contain hidden aesthetic imperativeness. Writers, artists, poets, directors, architects, designers and others describe it through the art and thereby bring it in the realities of social being. Thus, the aesthetic expediency appears as a phenomenon of imperativeness and becomes an impulse for changing the forms of life itself. The classical heritage provides the foundation for understanding and research of the aesthetic imperativeness, not only in art, but as one of the modulators of human behavior and activity.
References
Грищенко Н.В. Творчисть як модус укоріненості людини в бутті. Virtus: Scientific Journal / Editor-in-Chief M.A. Zhurba. January #20, Part 1, 2018. p. 14-17.
Проценко О. П. Поступок в системе морально-правовой и эстетической императивности. Вісник ХДАДМ. №8. 2014. С. 81-84
Тургенев И. С. Рудин. Дворянское гнездо. Накануне. Отцы и дети. М.: Художественная литература, 1983. 544 с.
Кант И. Трактаты и письма / пер. с нем. Н. Вальденберг и др. М.: Наука, 1980. 709 с.
Исаев В. Д. Человек в пространстве цивилизации и культуры. Луганск: Світлиця, 2003. 188 с.
Петінова О.Б. «Раціональний максимізатор» у сучасному суспільстві: Homo Economicus економічного мейнстріму. Virtus: Scientific Journal / Editor-in-Chief M.A. Zhurba. February # 21, 2018. С.53-57
Пирашвили З. Иеронимус Босх. Эпифания. Крещатик. 2007. № 3. С. 24-30.
Федь В.А. Дилема "Етичне-естетичне" у проекції модерну: автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. філос. наук: спец. 09.00.08 "Естетика". К., 1998. 17 с.
Гальченко М. С. Трансформація соціокультурних цінностей і знання в просторі глобалізації. Гілея: науковий вісник. Збірник наукових праць. К. : «Видавництво «Гілея», 2018. Вип. 129 (2). С. 146-150.
Пушонкова О. А. Динаміка форм візуальної репрезентації (естетичний аспект): автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. філос. наук: спец. 09.00.08 "Естетика". К., 2006. 16 с.
Бычков В. В Эстетика: учебник. [2-е изд., перераб. и доп.]. М.: Гардарики, 2006. 572 с.
Исаев В. Д. Эстетическая целесообразность как инобытие целесообразности экономической. Філософські дослідження: зб. наук. праць. Луганськ: СНУ ім. В. Даля, 2007. № 8. С. 141-146.
Манжура В. І. Соціальна детермінація естетичної свідомості: автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня канд. філос. наук: спец. 09.00.03 "Соціальна філософія та філософія історії". Запоріжжя, 2003. 15 с.
Лунгин П. Остров покаяния. Kino.zbir.info Український кінопортал – URL: http://www.kino.zbir.info/2007/09/12/ostrov/.
Гаршин В. М. Рассказы. М.: Художественная литература, 1983. 391 с.
Grischenko, N.V. (2018) Tvorchist yak modus ukorinenostI lyudini v buttI. Virtus: Scientific Journal, January 20, 1, 14-17 [in Ukrainian].
Protsenko, O.P. (2014) Postupok v sisteme moralno-pravovoy i esteticheskoy imperativnosti. Visnik HDADM, 8, 81-84 [in Ukrainian].
Turgenev, I.S. (1983). Rudin. Dvoryanskoe gnezdo. Nakanune. Ottsyi i deti M.: Hudozhestvennaya literatura [In Russian].
Kant, I. (1980). Traktatyi i pisma. M.: Nauka. [In Russian].
Isaev, V.D. (2003) Chelovek v prostranstve tsivilizatsii i kulturyi. Lugansk: Svitlitsya [in Ukrainian].
Petinova, O.B. (2018). Ratsionalniy maksimizator u suchasnomu suspilstvi: Homo Economicus ekonomichnogo meynstrimu. Scientific Journal February, 21, 53-57 [in Ukrainian].
Pirashvili, Z. (2007). Ieronimus Bosh. Epifaniya, 3, 24-30. Kreschatik [In Russian].
Fed, V.A. (1998) Dilema "Etichne-estetichne" u proektsiyi modernu: avtoref. dis. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. fIlos. nauk: spets. 09.00.08 "Estetika" K. [in Ukrainian].
Galchenko, M.S. (2018). TransformatsIya sotsIokulturnih tsInnostey I znannya v prostorI globalIzatsIYi. GIleya: naukoviy vIsnik, 129 (2), 146-150. K.: Vidavnitstvo «GIleya [in Ukrainian].
Pushonkova, O.A. (2006). Dinamika form vizualnoyi reprezentatsiyi (estetichniy aspekt): avtoref. dis. K. [in Ukrainian].
Byichkov, V.V (2006). Estetika: uchebnik. M.: Gardariki [In Russian].
Isaev, V.D. (2007). Esteticheskaya tselesoobraznost kak inobyitie tselesoobraznosti ekonomicheskoy. FIlosofskI doslidzhennya, 8, 141-146, Lugansk: SNU im. V. Dalya [in Ukrainian].
Manzhura, V.I. (2003). Sotsialna determinatsiya estetichnoi svidomostI: avtoref. Dis. Zaporizhzhya [in Ukrainian].
Lungin, P. Ostrov pokayaniya. Kino.zbir.info – Ukrainskiy kinoportal – Retrieved from http://www.kino.zbir.info/2007/09/12/ostrov/ [In Russian].
Garshin, V.M. (1983). Rasskazyi. M.: Hudozhestvennaya literatura [In Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).