Criticism and verifications of the theory of ecomuseum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166909Keywords:
ecomuseum, new museology, social and cultural use of museum, institutional specific of museum, institutional critique of museum, community and museum, museum as social and cultural institution, theory of museum institution, Quebec Declara-tion, neomania in museology.Abstract
Purpose of the article. It aims to reveal contradictions between «new museology» («ecomuseology») and unpredictable consequences of implementation of this theory. Methodology. K.Popper’s Criticism, situational analysis. Scientific novelty. «New museology» is obsolete. Also this theory isn’t universal. Conclusions. Revealed following contradictions. It is very necessary for ecomuseum tied with ideal community, rooted in definite territory. Actually, there are little such communities and its amount decreases. In addition community, which required for ecomuseum, must have strong personal ties. But nowadays there are tendency to transformations to «abstract society». As a result, weak, casual and irregular links between people became more important and useful. Thereby, ecomuseums can influent for society with demodernization manner. Despite of contradictions, which considered above, ecomuseum still exist in museum landscape. It means, that theory of ecomuseum (new museology) is not completely false. Not universal, but some of it provisions are correspond with real life. Some fragments of idea Ecomuseums passed natural selection. So, further investigation would solve the problem, why concept ecomuseum can’t replace concept museum. It is necessary for that to attempt refute theory of «new museology» («ecomuseology»).
References
Ecomuseum // Wikipedia. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecomuseum (date of appeal: 30.09.18).
Museum. Экомузеи: Ежеквартальный журнал ЮНЕСКО 1985. № 148.66 с.
Sola T. How ecomuseums have changed our jobs (half a century of experience) // Academia. URL: https://www.academia.edu/37696758/How_ecomuseums_have_changed_our_jobs_half_a_century_of_experience (date of appeal: 30.09.18).
Варин де Ю. Термин и его значение. Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 5.
Квебекская декларация. Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 21.
Конаре А.У. Программа экомузея Сахеля. Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 50–56.
Кох Р. Суперсвязи. Klex.ru – архив книг. URL: http://www.klex.ru/c7o (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Крус-Раимрес А. «Музей родного края»: извращение идеи. Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 62–63.
Куклинова И.А. Новая музеология в трудах современных исследователей. Российское музееведение. URL: http://museumstudy.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Kuklinova.pdf (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Маньковська Р.В. Музейна справа в Україні: теоретичні, практичні та антропологічні виміри історичного досвіду (1920-і рр. – початок ХХІ ст.) Переяслав-Хмельницький державний педагогічний університет. URL: https://phdpu.edu.ua/images/%D0%A0%D0%90%D0%94%D0%90%20%D0%94%2027.053.01/01122017/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81_%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86i%D1%8F.pdf (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Мейран П. Новая музеология. Museum. Экомузеи. 1984. № 148. С. 20–21.
Патнем Р. Гра в кеглі наодинці: занепад соціального капіталу Америки. Незалежний культурологічний часопис «Ї». URL: http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n21texts/putnem.htm.
Патнем Р. Чтобы демократия сработала. Гражданские традиции в современной Италии. М., 1996. 288 с.
Поппер К. Відкрите суспільство та його вороги. Т.1. К., 1994. 447 с.
Ривьер Ж. А. Эволюционное определение экомузея. Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 2–3.
Талеб, Н.Н. Антихрупкость. Как извлечь выгоду из хаоса [Электронный ресурс]. М., 2014. Файл (.rtf).
Хадсон К. Влиятельные музеи. Новосибирск, 2001. 194 с.
Шола Т. Вечность здесь больше не живет. Толковый словарь музейных грехов. Тула, 2013. 357 с.
Экомузеи. Российская музейная энциклопедия. URL: http://www.museum.ru/rme/sci_eco.asp (дата обращения: 30.09.18).
Юбер Ф. Экомузеи во Франции: противоречия и несоответствия. Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 6-10.
Яковець І.О. Сучасний художній музей як мистецький патерн: сутність, функціонування, розвиток. Національна академія керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. URL: https://www.nakkkim.edu.ua/images/Special-Science-Council/Materialy-Dysertaciy/2018-Yakovets/DISS-YAKOVETS.pdf (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Ecomuseum. Wikipedia. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecomuseum [in English].
Museum (1984). Ekomuzei: Ezhekvartal'nyj zhurnal JUNESKO. № 148 [in Russian]
Sola, T. How ecomuseums have changed our jobs (half a century of experience). Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/37696758/How_ecomuseums_have_changed_our_jobs_half_a_century_of_experience [in English]
Varin de, H. (1985). Termin i ego znachenie. Museum. № 148, p. 5 [in Russian]
Kvebekskaja deklaracija. (1985). Museum. № 148 [in Russian]
Konare, А.U. (1985). Programma ekomuzeja Sahelja. Museum. № 148, pp. 50–56 [in Russian]
Koch, R. Supersvjazi [Superconnets]. Retrieved from: http://www.klex.ru/c7o [in Russian]
Cruz-Ramirez, A. (1985). «Muzej rodnogo kraja»: izvrashhenie idei. Museum. № 148, pp. 62–63[in Russian]
Kuklinova, I.A. Novaja muzeologija v trudah sovremennyh issledovatelej. Retrieved from: http://museumstudy.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Kuklinova.pdf [in Russian]
Mankovska, R.V. Muzeina sprava v Ukraini: teoretychni, praktychni ta antropolohichni vymiry istorychnoho dosvidu (1920-i rr. – pochatok ХХІ st.). Retrieved from: https://phdpu.edu.ua/images/%D0%A0%D0%90%D0%94%D0%90%20%D0%94%2027.053.01/01122017/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81_%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86i%D1%8F.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Meyran, P. (1984). Novaja muzeologija. Museum. 1984. № 148, pp. 20–21 [in Russian]
Putnam, R. Hra v kehli naodyntsi: zanepad sotsialnoho kapitalu Ameryky [Bowling Alone. The Declinee of social capital in America]. Retrieved from: http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n21texts/putnem.htm [in Ukrainian]
Putnam, R. (1996). Chtoby demokratija srabotala. Grazhdanskie tradicii v sovremennoj Italii [Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy]. Moscow [in Russian]
Popper, K. (1994). Vidkryte suspil`stvo ta jogo vorogy [Open society and its enemies]. Vol. 1. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]
Rivière, G.H. (1985). Evoljucionnoe opredelenie ekomuzeja. Museum. № 148, pp. 2–3 [in Russian]
Taleb, N.N. (2014). Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder. Retrieved from offline resource (.rtf) [in Russian]
Hudson, K. (2001). Museums of influence. Novosibirsk [in Russian]
Shola, T. (2013).Vechnost' zdes' bol'she ne zhivet. Tolkovyj slovar' muzejnyh grehov [Eternity does not live here anymore – a glossary of museum sins]. Tula [in Russian]
Ekomuzei. Retrieved from: http://www.museum.ru/rme/sci_eco.asp [in Russian]
Hubert, F. (1985). Еkomuzei vo Francii: protivorechija i nesootvetstvija. Museum. № 148, pp. 6-10 [in Russian]
Yakovets, I.O. Suchasnyi khudozhnii muzei yak mystetskyi patern: sutnist, funktsionuvannia, rozvytok. Retrieved from: https://www.nakkkim.edu.ua/images/Special-Science-Council/Materialy-Dysertaciy/2018-Yakovets/DISS-YAKOVETS.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
