Ukrainian iconostasis: from a functional construction to an architectural frame
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.167036Keywords:
Iconostasis, architectural frame, blind arcade, meaning.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to determine the process of transformation of the medieval iconostasis with wall-to-wall horizontal beams as main structural/supporting elements to the new type – iconostasis as an architectural frame – which it becomes on the border of the 16–17th century. The research methodology is based on the iconological and comparative methods, which allow identifying the rules of construction, combinations, and relationships between the structural elements of the architectural frame of the XVII century Ukrainian iconostasis, to determine the ideological sources of the formation of such model of the iconostasis and disclose its meanings. The scientific novelty of the work is connected with the expansion of knowledge about the development of the Ukrainian iconostasis. Among the main sources that influenced the formation of the new image of the Ukrainian iconostasis were the Greek tradition of organizing sanctuary barriers and the Latin tradition of framing a religious image. Creating a new concept of the Ukrainian iconostasis at the junction of two traditions was a reaction to the social and political context of the period, which appeared in the Western European art of the Renaissance. Conclusions. Creating a new concept of the Ukrainian iconostasis at the junction of two traditions was a reaction to the social and political context of the period. The introduction to the Ukrainian iconostasis of the frames and its transformation at the beginning of the 17th century in an architectural frame gives the basis to consider this transformation as an ideological project. The new design of the Ukrainian iconostasis, due to the introduction of the blind arcade in the upper tier and the abundant decoration of all surfaces, referred to a similar device of the iconoscopes of the Balkans, and especially the iconostases of Athos. Under the conditions of the establishment of the Greek Catholic Church, such iconostasis construction was a visual marker of the confessional identity of an Orthodox Ukrainian church. At the same time, one of the goals of simultaneously increasing the spatial depth of the iconostasis could be the desire to strengthen the emotional impression of its new architectural image. The use of monumental volumetric structures to influence the consciousness of believers is a technique widely used by the Catholic the art of the time.
References
Александрович В. С. Мистецтво другої половини XVI – початку XVII ст. Образотворче мистецтво: Скульптура. Історія українського мистецтва: у 5 т. Київ : НАН України, ІМФЕ ім. М. Т. Рильського, 2011. Т. 3. С. 71–98.
Барт Р. От произведения к тексту. Избранные работы. Семиотика. Поэтика: Пер. с фр. Москва: Прогресс, 1989. С.413–423.
Бусева-Давыдова И. Л. Русский иконостас XVII века: генезис типа и итоги эволюции. Иконостас. Происхождение – Развитие – Символика. Москва: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. С. 621–650.
Војводић Д. Деизисни чин из Пиве. Прилог проучавању иконостаса и иконописа у пивском манастиру. Зограф. 2014. № 38. С. 203–220.
Димитрій (Ярема), патріарх. Іконопис Західної України ХІІ–XV ст. Львів : Друкарські куншти, 2005. 508 с.
Драган М. Українська декоративна різьба ХVІ–ХVІІІ ст. Київ : Наукова думка, 1970. 203 с.
Живов В. М. Разыскания в области истории и предыстории русской культуры. Москва : ЯСК, 2002. 758 с.
Ісаєвич Я. Найдавніший історичний опис Львова. Жовтень. 1980. № 10. С. 105–114.
Поповска-Коробар В. Иконостасот на бигорскиот манастир во XVI–XVII век. Patrimonium. MK. Скопjе. 2014. №. 12. С. 243–259.
Ћоровић-Љубинковић М. Дуборезни иконостаси ХVII века на Светој Гори. Хиландарски зборник. Беогрaд, 1966. Т. I. С. 121–134. Сл. 2–9.
Ћоровић-Љубинковић М. Средњевековни дуборез у источним областима Jyгославије. Београд : Naučno delo. 1965. 263 c.
Лазарев В. Н. Живопись и скульптура Новгорода. История русского искусства. В 13 т. Москва: Изд-во АН СССР, 1954. Т. II. С. 72–283.
Свєнціцький І. Іконопись Галицької України XV–XVI віків. Львів : Печатня оо. Василіян, 1928. 100 с.
Тарасов О. Ю. Рама и образ. Риторика обрамления в русском искусстве. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2007. 448 с.
Konstantynowicz J. B. Ikonostasis. Studien und Forschungen. Erster Band. Lwуw (Lemberg): Buchhandlung der Ševchenko Geselschaft der Wissenschaften. 1939. Bd. 1. 275 s.
Aleksandrovych, V. (2011). Mystectvo drugoi polovyny XVI – pochatku XVII st. Obrazotvorche mystectvo: Skulptura. Istorija ukrainskogo mystectva. Vol 3. (pp. 71–98). Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, IMFE im. M. T. Rylskogo [in Ukrainaian].
Bart, R. (1989). Ot proizvedeniia k tekstu. In Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika (pp. 413–423). Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
Buseva-Davydova, I. L. (2000). The Russian iconostasis of the 17th century: the genesis of the type and results of the evolution. In The Iconostasis. Origins – Evolution – Symbolism (pp.621–650). Moscow: Progress-Tradition [In Russian].
Vojvodić, D., Živković M. (2014). The Deesis row from Piva: A contribution to the study of the iconostasis and icon painting of the Monastery of Piva. Zoghraf, 38, 203–220 [in Bulgarian]
Dymytrij (Jarema), patriarh. (2005). Ikonopys Zahidnoi Ukrainy XII–XV st. Lviv: Drukarski kunshty [in Ukrainian].
Dragan, M. (1970). Ukrainian Decorative Carving in ХVІ–ХVІІІ Centuries. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Zhivov, V. M. (2002). Razyskaniia v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul'tury. Moscow: IaSK [In Russian].
Isajevych, Ja. (1980). Najdavnishyj istorychnyj opys Lvova. Zhovten, 10, 105–114 [in Ukrainian].
Popovska-Korobar, V. (2014). The iconostasis of bigorski monastery in the 16th–17th centuries. Theoretical reconstruction. Patrimonium. MK, 12, 243–259 [in Bulgarian].
Ćorović-Ljubinković, M. (1966). Duborezni ikonostasi XVII veka na Svetoj Gori. Hilandarski zbornik, I, 121–134 [in Bulgarian].
Ćorović-Ljubinković, M. (1965). Srednjevekovni duborez u istočnim oblastima Jygoslavije. Beograd: Naućno delo [in Bulgarian].
Lazarev, V. N. (1954). Zhivopis' i skul'ptura Novgoroda. In Istoriia russkogo iskusstva. Vol. 2 (pp. 72–283). Mocow: Izd-vo AN SSSR [In Russian].
Svjencickyj, I. (1928). Ikonopys Galyckoi Ukrainy XV–XVI vikiv. Lviv: Pechatnja oo. Vasylijan [In Ukrainian].
Tarasov, O. (2007). Frame and Image. Rhetoric of Framing in Russian Art. Moscow, Russia: Progress-Tradition [In Russian].
Konstantynowicz, J. B. (1939). Ikonostasis. Studien und Forschungen. Erster Band. Bd. 1. Lwуw (Lemberg): Buchhandlung der Ševchenko Geselschaft der Wissenschaften [In Polish].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).