THE PROGRAMS OF COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS GRADUATE IN GERMAN AND US UNIVERSITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.171109Keywords:
computational linguistics, graduate programs, teaching, German and US universities.Abstract
Abstract: The job of data innovations and computerized reasoning is always developing in the cutting edge world. Programmed language preparing with the assistance of PC programs is broadly utilized in different circles of human exercises. Preparing very qualified experts in this field is turning into a fundamental segment of the instructive procedure at present day colleges. The article goes for breaking down different practices of showing strategies for computational semantics at the alumni level. In the focal point of consideration are programs in this subject offered by chosen German and American colleges. The creators analyze diverse way to deal with developing prospectuses in computational semantics in Germany and the USA and the purposes behind picking specific courses and instructive
systems. We utilize customary strategies for experimental investigation, for example, depiction and arrangement, content examination, correlation and unions. While still at its improvement organize showing PC semantics as a scholarly branch of knowledge lacks a very much grounded obvious structure and is affected, as it were, by instructive conventions of colleges that offer it. The aftereffects of the examination feature the fundamental focal points of the projects, these that can additionally be utilized to improve and systemize techniques to preparing in this cross-disciplinary territory. The investigation unmistakably shows the that at the present stage colleges are looking for the correct harmony between the semantics and the computational piece of the common language preparing schedules nearby with estimating the vital level of their hypothetical and reasonable segments. The accomplishments of the best German and American colleges in the field of preparing in computational etymology could be connected to the frameworks of advanced education in different nations.
Keywords: computational linguistics, graduate programs, teaching, German and US universities.
References
Amaro, R. (2016). Teaching Computational Linguistics: Challenges and Target Audiences. II World Congress on Computer Science. Engineering and Technology Education. Portugal: Castelo Branco.
Baldridge, J., Erk, K. (2008). Teaching computational linguistics to a large, diverse student body: courses, tools, and interdepartmental interaction. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Issues in Teaching Computational Linguistics (TeachCL-08). Columbus: Ohio; pp. 1-9.
Bockwinkel. (2016). Proceedings for the Workshop on Teaching NLP for Digital Humanities. Berlin: RWTH Aachen
University; 2016. URL: https://www.dfki.de/lt/publication_sho-w.php?id=9290
Can, B., Manandhar, S. (2018). Tree Structured Dirichlet Processes for Hierarchical Morphological Segmentation.
Computational Linguistics, 44, 349-374.
Carnegie Mellon University. (2016). Language Technology Institute. URL: https://www.lti.cs.cmu.edu/learn.
Chinaei, H. (2017). Identifying and Avoiding Confusion in Dialogue with People with Alzheimer’s Disease. Computational Linguistics, 43, 377-406.
Clark, A. (2013). The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing. New York: Wiley- Blackwell.
Deng, D., Xue, N. (2017). Translation Divergences in Chinese-English Machine Translation: An Empirical
Investigation. Computational Linguistics, 43, 521-565.
Draxler, Ch. (2008). Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung. Eine Einfuerung. Tuebingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Fossler-Lussier, E. (2008). Strategies for Teaching “Mixed” Computational Linguistics Classes. Proceedings of the
Third Workshop on Issues in Teaching Computational Linguistics (TeachCL-08). Columbus: Ohio, pp. 36-44.
Gardent, C., Perez-Beltrachini, L. (2017). A Statistical, Grammar-Based Approach to Microplanning. Computational Linguistics, 43, 1-30.
Grosz, B. (2018). Smart Enough to Talk With Us? Foundations and Challenges for Dialogue Capable AI Systems. Computational Linguistics, 44, 1-15.
Irvine, A., Callison-Burch, Ch. (2017). A Comprehensive Analysis of Bilingual Lexicon Induction. Computational Linguistics, 43, 273-310.
Joty, S. (2017). Discourse Structure in Machine Translation Evaluation. Computational Linguistics, 43, 683-722.
Jurafsky, D., Martin, J. (2009). Speech and Language Processing: an introduction to natural language processing,
computational linguistics and speech recognition. New York: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education International.
Koit, M. (2002). Teaching Computational Linguistics at the University of Tartu: Experience, Perspective and
Challenges. Proceedings of the Workshop on Effective Tools and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing
and Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, July 2002, pp. 85-90.
Manning, Ch. (2015). Computational Linguistics and Deep Learning. Computational Linguistics, 41, 701-707.
Master-Studienabschluesse. (2017). Computerlinguistik. URL: http://www.cis.uni-muenchen.de/download/studienplan/studienplan-ma-pool.pdf.
Mitkov, R. (2003). The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morey, M. (2018). A Dependency Perspective on RST Discourse Parsing and Evaluation. Computational Linguistics,
, 197-235.
Naim, I. (2018). Feature-Based Decipherment for Machine Translation. Computational Linguistics, 44, 525-546.
Neubig, G., Watanabe, T. (2016). Optimization for Statistical Machine Translation: A Survey. Computational
Linguistics, 42, 1-54.
Nikolaeva, A. D., & Savvinov, V. M. (2016). Multi-ethnic school in the Russian Federation: the Preconditions of
Formation and Development (a case study of a national region). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education,
(10), 3405-3414.
Nguyen, D, Eisenstein, J. (2017). A Kernel Independence Test for Geographical Language Variation. Computational
Linguistics, 43, 567-592.
Reiter, E.A. (2018). Structured Review of Validity of BLEU. Computational Linguistics, 44, 393-401.
Roark, B., Sproat, R. (2007). Computational Approach to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rozovskaya, A. (2017). Adapting to Learner Errors with Minimal Supervision. Computational Linguistics, 43, 723- 760.
Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg. (2017). Neuphilologische Fakultaet, Institut fuer Computerlinguistik.
Masterstudiengang Computerlinguistik. URL: https://www.cl.uni-
heidelberg.de/programofstudy/ma/downloads/MA_Modulhandbuch.pdf.
Shutova, E. (2017). Multilingual Metaphor Processing: Experiments with Semi-Supervised and Insupervised Learning.
Computational Linguistics, 43, 71-123.
Stab, Ch., Gurevych, I. (2017). Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays. Computational Linguistics, 43,
-123.
Taştan, S.B., Davoudi, S.M.M., Masalimova, A.R., Bersanov, A.S., Kurbanov, R.A., Boiarchuk, A.V., Pavlushin,
A.A.(2018). The Impacts of Teacher’s Efficacy and Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement in Science Education
among Secondary and High School Students, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(6),
-2366.
Tripodi, R., Pelillo, M. (2017). A Game-Theoretic Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 43, 31-70.
University of Colorado Boulder. (2017). Department of Linguistics. Computational Linguistics (CLASIC). URL:
https://www.colorado.edu/linguistics/graduate-program/computational-linguistics-clasic-ms
University of Konstanz, Faculty of Humanities. (2018). Module Handbook for the Master’s Programme in Speech and
Language Processing. URL: https://www.uni-konstanz.de/uploads/tx_studiengang/en_modulebook_248_1540207459.pdf
University of Washington. (2018) Master of Science in Computational Linguistics. URL:
https://www.compling.uw.edu/academic-experience/courses/.
Videla, Carmen Gloria Burgos, et al. "Caracterización del discurso sobre innovación curricular en FID en
universidades de Chile." Opción 34.86 (2018): 201-234.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
