FEATURES OF THE DYSPHEMISMS IN ARTISTIC DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.173614Abstract
Abstract. This article describes the specific features of the dysphemisms used in the artistic discourse. We examined the history of the study of the concept of discourse, disassembled the differences between the concepts of "discourse" and "text," and also identified key features of the artistic text. The term "dysfemism" is defined in the work and its differences from vulgarisms and explicit language are singled out. We have established a special role of the dysphemisms in the framework of artistic discourse. Within the framework of artistic discourse, dysfemisms have a specific goal: to demonstrate to the recipient the emotional state of the hero and his attitude to a particular phenomenon. From this perspective, we examined the different types of dysfemisms used in artistic discourse and selected examples from English fiction prose.
Keywords: Artistic discourse; Artistic text; Dysphemism; Euphemism.
References
Artjushkina, L.V. (2002). Semanticheskij aspekt jevfemisticheskoj leksiki v sovremennom anglijskom jazyke: avtoref. dis. ... step. kand. filol. nauk [Semantic aspect of the euphemistic vocabulary in modern English: PhD (Philological Sciences)]. Moscow.
Arutjunova, N.D. (1998). Jazykoznanie. Bol'shoj jenciklopedicheskij slovar' [Linguistics. The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Bol'shaja Rossijskaja jenciklopedija.
Barinova, A.V. (2002). Stilisticheskaja oppozicija jevfemizm, disfemizm v rakurse funkcional'nyh stilej sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (k postanovke problemy) [Stylistic opposition euphemism, dysphemism in the forefront of the functional styles of the modern Russian literary language (to the formulation of the problem)]. Rechevoe obshhenie (Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty rechevogo obshhenija), 4 (12), 44–48.
Bow, J. (1991). Jane's journey. Lewes, East Sussex: The Book Guild Ltd.
Cooper, F. (1993). I believe in angels. London: Serpent's Tail.
Cornwell, B. (1990). Crackdown. London: Michael Joseph Ltd.
Guo, H. (2017). Osobennosti diskursa hudozhestvennogo proizvedenija [Features of the discourse of the work of art]. Molodoj uchenyj, 20(154), 483-486.
Karasik, V.I. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost', koncepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena.
Matveeva, T.V. (2010). Polnyj slovar' lingvisticheskih terminov [Full Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. Rostov- on-Don.
Pastuhova, O.D. (2015). Disfemizmy anglijskogo jazyka i ih strukturnye osobennosti [Dysfemism of English language and their structural features]. SMALTA, 2.
Rezanova, A.N. (2007). Pragmatika disfemii v sovremennom anglijskom jazyke [Pragmatics of dysphhemia in modern English]. Studia Linguistica XVI. Jazyk. Tekst. Kul'tura.
Ripley, M. (1991). Angel hunt. London: Fontana Press.
Rutherford, D. (1990). A game of sudden death. London: Macmillan & Doubleday.
Sidelnikova, E.A. (2011). Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskaja specifika jevfemizacii, disfemizacii v narrative finansovo-jekonomicheskogo krizisa [Communicatively pragmatic specifics of euphemism, dysfemization in the narrative of the financial and economic crisis]. Politicheskaja lingvistika, 4, 253-258.
Tjupa, V.I. (2002). Khudozhestvennyj diskurs [Artistic discourse]. Tver': Izd-vo TvGU.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
