Identity and difference of culturological and anthropological schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.175264Keywords:
culturology, anthropology, national anthropological schools, intercultural communicationAbstract
Purpose of the article is to reveal the status of culturology in the system of scientific knowledge and its connection with world anthropological schools. The conceptual methodological core of the research is system analysis of culturology as a social and cultural phenomenon for the disclosure of its structural and value-semantic aspects; dialogue and historical-comparative methods for understanding the mechanisms of interaction of culturological and anthropological national schools. Scientific Novelty. For the first time, it is scientifically substantiated that the dominant determinants of the formation of culturology as an alternative to Western cultural and social anthropology are the conflict of traditions of two axiologically different socio-cultural environments and ideological differences in modeling the cultural process in the globalization space (the dichotomy of Western liberal and communist doctrines). It has been established that the vector of development of culturological and anthropological national schools is due to the historical and cultural process and socio-cultural realities; mechanisms of their interaction are revealed. Conclusions. The moderators of the formation of culturology as a science, its subject field and architectonics are revealed. The evolution of the paradigm basis of culturology and its connection with the national anthropological schools are traced: their identity and difference have been established.
References
Гадамер Г.-Г. Истина и метод. Основы философской герменевтики / пер. с нем., общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Б.Н. Бессонова. М.: Прогресс, 1988. 704 с.
Герчанівська П. Е. Культура в парадигмах XX–XXI ст.: монографія. К.: НАКККіМ, 2017. 378 с.
Гуссерль Э. Идеи к чистой феноменологии и феноменологической философии. Книга 1. Общее введение в чистую феноменологію / пер. с нем. А. Михайлова. М.: Академический проект, 2015. 456 с.
Дильтей В. Собрание сочинений: в 6 т. / пер. с нем. под ред. В.А. Куренного. М.: Три квадрата, 2004. Т. 3: Построение исторического мира в науках о духе. 2004. 415 с.
Мерло-Понті М. Феноменологія сприйняття. К.: Український центр духовної культури, 2001. 552 с.
Сартр Ж.-П. Бытие и ничто: опыт феноменологической онтологии. М.: Республика, 2004. 639 с.
Теплов Н.В. Что такое культура и что такое гениальность с точки зрения развития культуры.(Доклад, чит. в заседании Истор. Об-ва 24 марта 1902 г.). М.: Истор. О-во при Моск. ун-те, 1902. 50 с.
Фрейд З. По ту сторону принципа наслаждения. Тотем и табу. “Я“ и „Оно“. Неудовлетворенность культурой. 2-е изд. Х.; Белгород: Книжный клуб «Клуб Семейного Досуга», 2014. 478 с.
Фрейд З. Психология бессознательного / пер. с нем. М.: АСТ, 2008. 605 с.
Фрейд З. Психология масс и анализ человеческого «Я». М.: АСТ, 2017. 256 с.
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В. Бибихин, 5-е изд. М.: Академический проект, 2015. 452 с.
White L. The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization. New York: Percheron Press, 2017. 444 p.
Gadamer, G.-G. (1988). Truth and method. Basics of Philosophical Hermeneutics. (B.N. Bessonov, Trans.). Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
Gerchanivska, P.E. (2017). Culture in the paradigms of the XX – XXI centuries: monograph. Kyiv: NAKKKIM [in Ukrainian].
Husserl, E. (2015). Ideas to pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Book 1. General introduction to pure phenomenology (A. Mikhailov, Trans.). Moscow: Academic project [in Russian].
Dilthey, W. (2004). Collected Works: in 6 t. T. 3: The construction of the historical world in the sciences of the spirit (V.A. Kurennoy, Trans.). Moscow: Tri kvadrata [in Russian].
Merleau-Pontі, M. (2001). Phenomenology of perception. Kyiv: Ukrainian Center for Spiritual Culture [in Ukrainian].
Sartre, J.-P. (2004). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (V. I. Kolyadko, Trans.). Moscow: Republic [in Russian].
Teplov, N.V. (1902). What is culture and what is a genius from the point of view of the development of culture. Moscow: Moscow University [in Russian].
Freud, Z. (2014). On the other side of the principle of pleasure. Totem and taboo. “I” and “It”. Dissatisfaction with culture (I. Kuzmin, Trans.). Belgorod: Book Club “Family Leisure Club” [in Russian].
Freud, Z. (2008). Psychology of the unconscious. Moscow: AST [in Russian].
Freud, Z. (2017). The psychology of the masses and analysis of the human “I” Moscow: AST [in Russian].
Heidegger, M. (2015). Being and time (V. Bibikhin, Trans.). Moscow: Academic project [in Russian].
White, L. (2017). The Science of Culture. The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization. – New York: Percheron Press [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
