Innovative culture as the antithesis of mass culture (on the example of the comparison of the ideas of Max Horkheimer, Teodor Adorno, and Everett M. Rogers)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.175300Keywords:
mass culture, innovation culture, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Everett M. RogersAbstract
The purpose of the article is to highlight the peculiarities of innovation culture by comparing it with mass culture on the basis of the dialogue of texts by Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno «Dialectics of Enlightenment. Philosophical fragments» and Everett M. Rogers «Diffusion of Innovations». The methodology of the study is based on the use of determinism, comparative and system-structural analysis, socio-cultural studies, as well as principles of philosophical hermeneutics. The scientific novelty of the study is to establish and analyze the causal and investigative relationships that take place in the emergence of innovation culture in a society of mass consumption, in comparison with innovation culture and mass culture. Conclusions. As a result of the research, it was found that the emergence of an innovation culture is a consequence of the scale of the spread of mass culture, while the innovation culture is the antithesis of mass culture and destroys the mass consciousness as such. Increasing the level of innovativeness of an individual leads to his way out of the state of mass consciousness. The level of education and openness to permanent education of modern Internet user testify that it is a means of globalization of modern culture, rather than the totality of mass culture as one with its forms. Innovation culture overcomes the «mass» of a person in a society.
References
Digital 2019: Global Internet Use Accelerates. URL: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2019/01/digital-2019-global-internet-use-accelerates (дата звернення 3.04.2019)
Kyrylenko K. M. The evolution of philosophical discourse: from innovation to innovation culture. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Scientific journal. № 11–12. 2015 (November–December). Vienna, 2015. P. 98 – 101.
Factum Group Ukraine. Проникновение интернета в Украине. URL: https://inau.ua/sites/default/files/file/1903/dani_ustanovchyh_doslidzhen_za_1-y_kvartal_2019_0.pdf (дата звернення 3.04.2019)
Жилінська О., Фірсова С. Витрати комерціалізації наукоємної продукції у контексті маркетингових моделей дифузії інновацій Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Економіка. – 2015. Вип. 7. С. 6– 13. URL : http://papers.univ.kiev.ua/1/ekonomika/articles/zhylinska– o– firsova– s– outlay– for– commercialization– of– high– tech– products– in– t_24635.pdf
Культурология. ХХ век. Энциклопедия. Т. 2. СПб.: Университетская книга; 1998. 447 с.
Роджерс Еверетт М. Дифузія інновацій. К.: Видавничий дім Києво-Могилянська Академія. 2009. 592 с.
Хоркхаймер М. Культурная индустрия: просвещение как способ обмана мас. М. : Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016. 104 с.
Digital 2019: Global Internet Use Accelerates (30.01.2019). Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2019/01/digital-2019-global-internet-use-accelerates [in English].
Kyrylenko, K. M. (2015). The evolution of philosophical discourse: from innovation to innovation culture. Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11-12, 98-101 [in English].
Factum Group Ukraine. (2015). Internet penetration in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://inau.ua/sites/default/files/file/1903/dani_ ustanovchyh_doslidzhen_za_1-y_kvartal_2019_0.pdf. [in English].
Zhylinska, O. & Firsova, S. (2015). Costs of commercialization of science-intensive products in the context of marketing models of diffusion of innovations. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnohouniversytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Ekonomika, 7, 6–13. Retrieved from http://papers.univ.kiev.ua/1/ekonomika/articles/zhylinska– o– firsova– s– outlay– for– commercialization– of– high– tech– products– in– t_24635.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Kul'turologiya. XX vek. Entsiklopediya (2nd ed.). (1998). Saint-Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga [in Russian].
Rogers, E.M. (2009). Diffusion of innovations. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim Kyievo– Mohylianska Akademiia [in Ukrainian].
Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. (2016). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).