MEMETICS AND FRAMING IN CONSTRUCTING THE VALUE-SENSE CONCEPTS OF THE MODERN SOCIO-CULTURAL SPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.175367Keywords:
memetics, framing, frame, values, mass consciousness, communicationAbstract
Purpose of Research. The purpose of the research is to analyse the ways of constructing value-sense concepts of the modern socio-cultural space by the means of memetics and framing. Methodology. The methodology of the research includes the analytical, axiological, culturological methods to study the framing and memetics as the fundamental methods of forming the socio-cultural reality and its value-semantic definitions. Scientific Novelty. The scientific novelties of the research are for the first time to find out the points of interaction of the memetics and the framing of the socio-cultural everyday space by the means of the communication and to prove their influence on the formation of the mass consciousness and value-semantic definitions of the representatives of society. Conclusions. The processes, which are occurring in various spheres of public life, are reflected in the texts of the means of the mass culture. Everyone perceives any information through the prism of his own system of values. Materials that broadcast the "other" value system may be partially or even completely incomprehensible, unacceptable. It leads the formation of the neutral or negative ratings. Social phenomena and processes become the valuable ones, by their including into the system of subject-object value relationships. We can see the difference of the axiological meanings in the communication of the representatives of different ("alien") cultures, which differ in the specifics of the value orientations in the axiological sphere of the society. The development of the ability of critical thinking and rational attitude to the proposed values by the media space are important in the context of the intensification of the information flows. They are formed by means of framing and memetics. In addition, they are aimed at reducing the level of the thoughtless perception and imitation the information. The virtual or cyber environment focuses on the important events, aspects, and attitudes and gives them some estimations and involves them to a discourse, facilitating them by the analytical summaries of «experts» and «opinion leaders».
References
Александров П. Фейки та містифікації як явище сучасної медіакультури. Медіакритика. Львів. 2015. Вип. 22. С. 26–31.
Баева Л. В. Ценности изменяющегося мира: Экзистенциальная аксиология истории: монография. Астрахань, 2004. 275 с.
Бугаева И. Демотиваторы как новый жанр в Интернет-коммуникации: жанровые признаки, функции, структура, стилистика. URL: http://rastko.rs/filologija/stil/2011/10Bugaeva.pdf (дата звернення: травень 2017).
Герчанівська П. Е. Ціннісна система української народної християнської культури. Мультиверсум. Філософський альманах: Зб. наук. пр. Київ, 2008. Вип. 75. С. 111‒123.
Данько Ю. А. «Тролінг» як новий вид віртуальної комунікації. Український соціум. 2013. № 4 (47). С.17‒25.
Завадська О. В. Феномен креолізованого тексту: актуальна проблема сучасних лінгвістичних досліджень. Лінгвістичні дослідження: Зб. наук. праць ХНПУ ім. Г.С. Сковороди. 2016. Вип. 43. С.163–169.
Заморкин А. А. Виртуальные коммуникации как социокультурный феномен современности: автореф. дис. … канд филос наук: 09.00.11. Ставрополь, 2014. 23 с.
Красных В. В. От концепта к тексту и обратно (к вопросу о психолингвистике текста). Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 9.: Филология. 1998. № 1. С. 53‒70.
Личковах В. А. Сакральні горизонти української культури: Архетипи – хронотопи – сигнатури. Художня культура. Актуальні проблеми. 2010. Вип. 7. С. 187–194.
Масі Н. І., Ященко Л. Є. Тенденції іграїзації соціальних практик у формуванні ціннісно-змістовної складової комунікативної культури сучасної молоді. Збірник наукових праць «Гілея: науковий вісник». 2016 Вип. 109. С. 243‒246.
Удод Д. А. Креолизованный текст как особый вид паралингвистически активного текста. Современная филология: матер. II междунар. науч. конф. (г. Уфа, январь 2013 г.). Уфа: Лето, 2013. С. 97–99.
Aleksandrov, P. (2015). Fakes and Mystification as the Phenomenon of the Modern Media Culture. Mediakrytyka. Lviv, 22, 26-31 [in Ukrainian].
Baeva, L. V. (2004). Values of the Changeable World: Existential Axiology of History. Astrakhan [in Russian].
Bugaeva, I. (2011). Demotivators as the New Genre in Internet Communication: Genre Features, Functions, Structure, Stylistics. Retrieved from: http://rastko.rs/filologija/stil/2011/10Bugaeva.pdf [in Russian].
Gerchanivska, P. E. (2008). Valuable System of Ukrainian Folk Christian Culture. Multiversum. Philosophskyi Almanakh. (pp. 111-123). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Dan’ko, Yu. A. (2013). «Trolling» as a New Type of Virtual Communication. Ukrainskyi socium, 4 (47), 17-25 [in Ukrainian]..
Zavadskaya, O. V. (2016).The Phenomenon of the Creolized Text: an Actual Problem of the Modern Linguistic Research. Linguistychni Doslidzhennia KHNPU im. G. S. Skovorody, 43, 63-169 [in Russian].
Zamorkin, A. A. (2014). Virtual Communication as a Sociocultural Phenomenon of the Present. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Stavropol [in Russian].
Krasnykh, V. V. (1998). From a Concept to a Text and Vice Versa (regarding the issue of psycholinguistic text). Vestnik Moscowskogo Universiteta. Seria 9: Philologia, 1, 53-70 [in Russian].
Lychkovakh, V. A. (2010). The Sacral Horizons of the Ukrainian culture: Archetypes – Chronotopes – Signatures. Khudozhnia kultura. Aktualni problem, 7, 187-194 [in Ukrainian].
Masi, N. I. & Yashchenko, L. E. (2016). The Trends of the Gaming of the Social Practices in the Formation of the Value-Sense Component of the Communicative Culture of the Modern Youth. Gilea, 109, 243-246 [in Ukrainian].
Udod, D. A. (2013). Creolized Text as a Special Type of the Paralinguistic Active Text. Proceedings of the II international Scientific Conference «Contemporary philology», Ufa, January 2013. (pp. 97 – 99). Ufa: Leto [in Russian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).