THE SYNERGETICS AS A CONCEPT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Anna Kniazevych Rivne State University of Humanities, Ukraine
  • Vitaliy Dmytruk Separated Subdivision “Lviv Branch of the Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts”, Ukraine
  • Natalia Hrynokh Separated Subdivision “Lviv Branch of the Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts”, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.175483

Keywords:

development, nonlinearity, chaos, dissipation, synergetics, bifurcation points, attractors, mechanisms of management of innovative development.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is the investigation of the processes of the formation and establishment of the main provisions of synergetics, as of a modern concept of development, and of its practical application. The methodology. The synergetics paradigm is an interdisciplinary philosophical generalization, an explanation of various kinds of doctrines and approaches to the study and analysis of practically any phenomena in nature. The synergetic approach to reviewing the state of the management system is to see in the chaotic unstable (in terms of details) system future orderliness and stability, to simulate the course of certain social and economic processes and to provide a forecast using synergetic methods and chaos theory. Scientific Novelty. The results of the research provide the study and substantiation in the interdisciplinary aspect of the possibility of using the synergetic theory as a modern concept of development in various fields of scientific activity, including economics and management. Conclusions. Nonlinear processes cannot be precisely predicted, because development happens through the random choice of the path at the moment of bifurcation. With its help, one can study the laws that determine the nature of crisis phenomena in economics, management, politics, and society. Synergetics, as a universal approach to the disclosure of the nature and explanation of a wide range of various phenomena of reality, can be widely used for the analysis and modeling of managerial situations.

Author Biographies

Anna Kniazevych, Rivne State University of Humanities

D.Sc. in Economics, Associate Professor, The Professor of the Department of Management,

Vitaliy Dmytruk, Separated Subdivision “Lviv Branch of the Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts”

Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Professor, The Director

Natalia Hrynokh, Separated Subdivision “Lviv Branch of the Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts”

Ph.D. in History, Associate Professor, The Deputy Director of Educational Work

References

Бранский В.П. Теоретические основания социальной синергетики. Вопросы философии. 2000. №4. С. 112-129.

Всемирная энциклопедия: Философия / Главн. науч. ред. и сост. А.А. Грицанов. Москва: АСТ, Минск: Харвест, Современный литератор, 2001. 1312 с.

Добронравова І.С. Філософія науки та синергетика освіти. Вища освіта України. 2003. №2(8). С. 7-12.

Євтодюк А.В. Освітні системи: синергетична інтерпретація еволюції. Вища освіта України. 2003. №2(8). С. 31-40.

Капица С.П., Курдюмов С.П., Малинецкий Г.Г. Синергетика и прогнозы будущего. Москва: Едиториал, 2003. 288 с.

Князева Е.Н., Курдюмов С.П. Законы эволюции и самоорганизации сложных систем. Москва: Наука, 1994. 236 с.

Князева Е.Н. Синергетический вызов культуре. Синергетическая парадигма: многообразие поисков и подходов. Москва, 2000. 69 с.

Князевич А.О. Ринок інновацій в складі інноваційної інфраструктури країни. Маркетинг и менеджмент інновацій. № 3. 2015. С. 129–139.

Князевич А.О. Управління інфраструктурним забезпеченням інноваційного розвитку економіки: моногр. Рівне: Волинські обереги, 2018. 362 с.

Kniazevych A., Kyrylenko V., Golovkova L. Innovation infrastructure of Ukraine: assessment of the effectiveness of the action and ways of improvement. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 4. No. 1 January. 2018. P. 208–218.

Кичкирук Т.В. Вища економічна освіта в концепції синергетичної парадигми нелінійного мислення. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 2014. №5. С. 47-55.

Кремінь В.Г., Ільїн В.В. Філософія: мислителі, ідеї, концепції: підруч. Київ: Книга, 2005. 528 с.

Малинецкий Г.Г. От мозга к компьютеру и обратно. Знание – сила. 1994. №9. С. 40-50.

Наконечна О.П. Естетичне як тип духовності: моногр. Рівне. 2002. 202с.

Остапчук О.Є. Можливості синергетики в розбудові інноваційного освітнього простору. Педагогіка та психологія. 2004. №4 (45). С.16-28.

Пригожин И. Философия нестабильности. Комментарий С.П. Курдюмова. Вопросы философии. 1991. № 6. С. 46-51.

Рудий Б. Криза еволюціонізму. Київ: Четверта хвиля, 2003. 116 с.

Синергетике 30 лет. Интервью с профессором Г.Хакеном. Проведено Е.Н. Князевой. Вопросы философии. 2002. № 3. С. 53-61.

Тарасов Л.П. Самоорганізація матерії та дисипативні структури. Завуч. Наша вкладка. 2004. №36(222). С. 2-6.

Філософія : підручник для вищої школи /за заг. ред. В.Г. Кременя, М. І. Горлача. Вид. 3-є, перероб. та доп. Харків: Прапор, 2004. 736 с.

Хакен Г. Информация и самоорганизация. Макроскопический подход к сложным явлениям [пер. с англ.]. 2-ое изд. Москва: КомКнига, 2005. 248 с.

Branskij, V.P. (2000). Theoretical grounds for social synergetics. Questions of philosophy. 4. 112–129. [in Russian].

World Encyclopedia: Philosophy. (2001). Ed. by A.A. Gricanov. Moscow: AST, Minsk: Harvest, Sovremennyj literator. [in Russian].

Dobronravova I.S. (2003). Philosophy of science and synergetics of education. Higher education of Ukraine. 2(8). 7–12. [in Ukrainian].

Emelyanenko L. & Shkoda T. (2016). Integration of science, education and production in synergetic paradigm of public management. MEST Journal, Belgrade, Serbia. 2. 64–76. [in English].

Kapica, S.P., Kurdjumov, S.P. & Malineckij, G.G. (2003). Synergetics and forecasts of the future. Moscow: Editorial. [in Russian].

Knjazeva, E.N. & Kurdjumov, S.P. (1994). Laws of evolution and self-organization of complex systems. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].

Knjazeva, E.N. (2000). Synergy challenge to culture. Synergistic paradigm: a variety of searches and approaches. Moscow. [in Russian].

Kniazevych, A.O. (2015). Market of innovations in composition of the innovative infrastructure of country. Marketing and Management of Innovations. 3. 129 – 139. [in Ukrainian].

Kniazevych, A.O. (2018). Management of Infrastructure Provision of Innovative Economic Development. Rivne: Volyns'ki oberehy. [in Ukrainian].

Kniazevych, A., Kyrylenko, V. & Golovkova, L. (2018). Innovation infrastructure of Ukraine: assessment of the effectiveness of the action and ways of improvement. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 4. No. 1. 208–218. [in English].

Kychkyruk, T.V. (2014). Higher economic education in concepts of synergetic paradigm nonlinear thinking. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research. 5. 47–55. [in Ukrainian].

Kremin', V.H. & Il'in, V.V. (2005). Philosophy: thinkers, ideas, concepts. Kyiv: Knyha. [in Ukrainian].

Malynetskyj, H.H. (1994). From brain to computer and back. Knowledge is power. 9. 40–50. [in Russian].

Nakonechna, O.P. (2002). Aesthetic as a type of spirituality. Rivne. [in Ukrainian].

Ostapchuk, O.Ye. (2004). Possibilities of synergetics in the development of innovative educational space. Pedagogy and Psychology. 4 (45). 16–28. [in Ukrainian].

Prigozhin, I. (1991). The philosophy of instability. Questions of philosophy. 6. 46–51. [in Russian].

Rudyj, B. (2003). The crisis of evolutionism. Kyiv: Chetverta khvylia. [in Ukrainian].

Synergetics 30 years. Interview with Professor G. Haken. (2002). Questions of philosophy. By E.N. Knjazeva. 3. 53–61. [in Russian].

Tarasov, L.P. (2004). Self-organization of matter and dissipative structures. Zavuch. Nasha vkladka. 36(222). 2–6. [in Ukrainian].

Philosophy. (2004). Ed. by V.G. Kremen, M.I. Gorlach. Kharkiv: Prapor. [in Ukrainian].

Haken, G. (2005). Information and self-organization. Macroscopic approach to complex phenomena. Moscow: KomKniga. [in Russian].

Downloads

Published

2019-05-28

Issue

Section

Культурологія