Refutation of the theories of ecomuseum and new museology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.177531Keywords:
ecomuseum, new museology, for what museums, social and cultural usage of museum, institutional specific of museum, ecomuseology, CoC (Cabinet of curiosities) theory of museum, institutional (self-sustaining) theory of museum, social engineering, museification, freezing of community.Abstract
Purpose of the article. Theoretical refutation of theories of ecomuseum and «new museology». Methodology. Based on deductive logic. This means, that scientific truth convey from premisses to conclusion and vice versa: conveying falsity from conclusion (in case of irrelevance to empiric checking investigation) to at least one of premisses or both of them. Scientific novelty. Nowadays «new museology» someone bind with marketing, client approach to museum work (in other words, with sensitivity of museum to social demands). But really this approach has little to do with theoretical models of ecomuseology and new museology. Ecomuseum is a result of renovation of CoC (Cabinet of curiosities) theory. This one has many robustness and viability, confirmed by empirical investigations. Conclusions. Close ties with community is a modern discourse in museology and social science at whole, which give modernity look to old theories. In addition, museums more and more self-isolates from society. Thus, theories of ecomuseology and «new museology» look fresh and new. But they cannot to solve the scientific problem of social and cultural usage of museum and its institutional specific. Traditional museum mustn’t to transform in ecomuseums. Besides, second premiss, which argued, that ecomuseums provides the best ties with community is doubtful, because phenomenon of community become more exterritoriality and abstraction. Further investigations of social and cultural usage and institutional specific of museum might be development the theory of museum as laboratory.
References
Crime. Anacostia // Wikipedia. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anacostia#cite_note-14 (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Smithsonian Anacostia Community Museum. URL: http://anacostia.si.edu/ (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Варин де Ю. Термин и его значение // Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 5.
Докинз Р. Эгоистичный ген // http://evolution.powernet.ru/ URL: http://evolution.powernet.ru/library/gen/11.htm (дата звернення: 27.09.18).
Кинард Д. Музей как ускоритель общественного прогресса // Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 37-43.
Конаре А.У. Программа экомузея Сахеля // Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 50–56.
Крус-Раимрес А. «Музей родного края»: извращение идеи // Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 62–63.
Маньковська Р.В. Музейна справа в Україні: теоретичні, практичні та антропологічні виміри історичного досвіду (1920-і рр. – початок ХХІ ст.) // Переяслав-Хмельницький державний педагогічний університет. URL: https://phdpu.edu.ua/images/ %D0%A0%D0%90%D0%94%D0%90%20%D0%94%2027.053.01/01122017/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81_%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86i%D1%8F.pdf (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Мейран П. Новая музеология // Museum. Экомузеи. 1984. № 148. С. 20–21.
Поппер К. Объективное знание. Эволюционный подход // Гуманитарные технологии. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/ laboratory/ basis/4291/4295#t55 (дата обращения: 28.09.18).
Ривьер Ж. А. Эволюционное определение экомузея // Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 2–3.
Хадсон К. Влиятельные музеи. Новосибирск, 2001. 194 с.
Шмит Ф. И. Музейное дело. Вопросы экспозиции. Ленинград, 1929. URL: http://www.studmed.ru/shmit-fi-muzeynoe-delo-voprosy-ekspozicii_bb0d992b5be.html (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Шола Т. Вечность здесь больше не живет. Толковый словарь музейных грехов. Тула, 2013. 357 с.
Юбер Ф. Экомузеи во Франции: противоречия и несоответствия // Museum. Экомузеи. 1985. № 148. С. 6-10.
Яковець І.О. Сучасний художній музей як мистецький патерн: сутність, функціонування, розвиток // Національна академія керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. URL: https://www.nakkkim.edu.ua/images/Special-Science-Council/Materialy-Dysertaciy/2018-Yakovets/DISS-YAKOVETS.pdf (дата звернення: 30.09.18).
Crime. Anacostia. Wikipedia. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anacostia#cite_note-14 [in English]
Smithsonian Anacostia Community Museum. Retrieved from: http://anacostia.si.edu/ [in English]
Varin de, H. (1985). Termin i ego znachenie. Museum. № 148, p. 5 [in Russian]
Dawkins, R. Egoistichnyiy gen. Retrieved from: http://evolution.powernet.ru/ URL: http://evolution.powernet.ru/library /gen/11.htm [in Russian]
Kinard, J. Muzej kak uskoritel obshhestvennogo progressa. Museum. № 148, pp. 37-43 [in Russian]
Konare, А.U. (1985). Programma ekomuzeja Sahelja. Museum. № 148, pp. 50–56 [in Russian]
Cruz-Ramirez, A. (1985). «Muzej rodnogo kraja»: izvrashhenie idei. Museum. № 148, pp. 62–63[in Russian]
Mankovska, R.V. Muzeina sprava v Ukraini: teoretychni, praktychni ta antropolohichni vymiry istorychnoho dosvidu (1920-i rr. – pochatok ХХІ st.). Retrieved from: https://phdpu.edu.ua/images/%D0%A0%D0%90%D0%94%D0%90%20%D0%94%2027. 053.01/01122017/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81_%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B4% D0%B8%D1%81%D0 %B5%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86i%D1%8F.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Meyran, P. (1984). Novaja muzeologija. Museum. 1984. № 148, pp. 20–21 [in Russian]
Popper, K. Obektivnoe znanie. Evolyutsionnyy podkhod. Retrieved from http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/4291/4295#t55 [in Russian]
Rivière, G.H. (1985). Evoljucionnoe opredelenie ekomuzeja. Museum. № 148, pp. 2–3 [in Russian]
Hudson, K. (2001). Museums of influence. Novosibirsk [in Russian]
Smit, F. I. (1929). Muzejnoe delo. Voprosy jekspozicii. Retrieved from: http://www.studmed.ru/shmit-fi-muzeynoe-delo-voprosy-ekspozicii_bb0d992b5be.html
Shola, T. (2013).Vechnost' zdes' bol'she ne zhivet. Tolkovyj slovar' muzejnyh grehov [Eternity does not live here anymore – a glossary of museum sins]. Tula [in Russian]
Hubert, F. (1985). Еkomuzei vo Francii: protivorechija i nesootvetstvija. Museum. № 148, pp. 6-10 [in Russian]
Yakovets, I.O. Suchasnyi khudozhnii muzei yak mystetskyi patern: sutnist, funktsionuvannia, rozvytok. Retrieved from: https://www.nakkkim.edu.ua/images/Special-Science-Council/Materialy-Dysertaciy/2018-Yakovets/DISS-YAKOVETS.pdf [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
