DIFFERENTIATION OF COMPUTER-AIDED FORM-MAKING INTERPRETATIONS IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF POSTMODERNISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.177793Keywords:
hypersurface, computer-aided form-making, architectural design, postmodernismAbstract
The purpose of the article is to specify the differentiated concepts of computer-aided form-making in the architectural design of postmodernism. Methodology. Within the frame of the tasks set the analysis and synthesis of scientific achievements of well-known scientists and world-renowned designers in architecture were conducted, methods of generalization and systematization of the research subject were used. Scientific novelty. A detailed explanation of computer-aided form-making in the architectural design of postmodernism is for the first time presented in this work. The notion of "hypersurface" is specified and extended. The role and place of the computer which is transformed into an element of the paradigmatic and synergetic reality by means of which the transfer of intelligence occurs are determined. Conclusions. As a result of the differentiation and analysis of the concepts of computer-aided form-making, applied in the architectural design of postmodernism, the following assumptions can be made: 1) the hypersurface is created as a space that does not divide, but rather encompasses, at the same time there is unification of the avant-garde and the ordinary system in the general human culture; 2) the computer originally being the proper factor of the design process as an exteriorly defined instrument of interpretation becomes a computer reality and acquires characteristics of paradigmatic and synergetic reality; 3) automation of thought takes place, with computers becoming its symbol; moreover, the transfer of intelligence to the systems occurs, and this is a question of the culture of creativity. It is impossible to get rid of it, but an architect or a designer still remains the creator and original source.
References
Авдеева В.В. История зарубежного искусства. Архитектура XX века. Москва : Юрайт, 2018. 112 с.
Добрицына И.А. От постмодернизма – к нелинейной архитектуре. Москва : Прогресс-Традиция, 2004. 416 с.
Игнатьева И.Ф. Антропология техники: Человек как субъект мира техники. Екатеринбург : Изд-во Уральского ун-та, 1992. 130 с.
Легенький Ю.Г. Культурология изображения (опыт композиционного синтеза). Киев : ГАЛПУ, 1995. 412 с.
Легенький Ю.Г. Об архитектуре (очерки теории дизайна интерьера). Киев : Изд. центр КНУКиМ, 2005. 692 с.
Моисеев И.И. Универсум. Информация. Общество. Москва: Устойчивый мир, 2001. 199 с.
Рыклин М. Великий Автомат. Беседа с Полем Вирилио. Деконструкция и деструкция : беседы с философами. Москва : Логос, 2002. С. 124-138.
Хасиева М.А. Концепция постмодернизма в философии метаболизма К. Курокавы. Гуманитарный вектор. 2018. № 13 (3). С. 75-83.
Эстетические ценности предметно-пространственной среды / под. ред. А.В. Иконникова. Москва : Стройиздат, 1990. 335 с.
Perrella S. Hypersurface Theory: Architecture & Culture. Architectura & Design. 1998. № 68 (5/6). С. 7-15.
Avdeeva, V.V. (2018). History of foreign art. The architecture of the XX century. Moscow: Yurayt [in Russian].
Dobritsyina, I.A. (2004). From postmodernism to non-linear architecture. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].
Ignateva, I.F. (1992). Anthropology of technology: Man as a subject of the world of technology. Yekaterinburg: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo universiteta [in Russian].
Legenkiy, Yu.G. (1995). Image culture (experience of compositional synthesis). Kyiv: GALPU [in Russian].
Legenkiy, Yu.G. (2005). About architecture (essays on the theory of interior design). Kyiv: KNUKiM Publishing [in Russian].
Moiseev, I.I. (2001). Universum. Information. Society. Moscow: Ustoychivyiy mir [in Russian].
Ryiklin, M. (2002). Great Automaton. Conversation with Paul Virilio. In Deconstruction and destruction: Conversations with philosophers (pp. 124-138). Moscow: Logos [in Russian].
Hasieva, M.A. (2018). The concept of postmodernism in the philosophy of metabolism K. Kurokawa. Gumanitarnyiy vektor, 13 (3), 75-83 [in Russian].
Ikonnikov, A.V. (Ed). (1990). Aesthetic values of the subject-spatial environment. Moscow: Stroyizdat [in Russian].
Perrella, S. (1998). Hypersurface Theory: Architecture & Culture. Architectura & Design, 68 (5-6), 7-15 [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).