ANCIENT ROMAN OTIUM AS A CULTURAL PRACTICE AND THEORETICAL REFLECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2020.196555Keywords:
culture, otium, intellectual and entertainment leisure activity, leisure infrastructure of leisure activity, leisure activity practices.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the ancient Roman leisure activity as a theoretical reflection and cultural practice. The methodology of the research is reduced to the usage of historical and cultural approach that allows combining diachronic and synchronic methods to the study leisure activity as a polysemantic cultural phenomenon. Scientific Novelty. The topicality of the research is to identify and substantiate the conditions that led to the formation and development in ancient Roman intellectual and entertainment leisure activities, contemplative and active leisure activities, leisure activity as a means of self-development and leisure activity as a mass cultural practice. Conclusions. Leisure activity was perceived as a rest from work, a day dedicated to God, pleasure, safe for moral values (Virgiliy, Georgiki) in Republican Rome. As a result of the conquests in the East and the expansion of Greek culture, the value system of the Romans underwent significant changes, which was clearly manifested in the development of leisure activity in two interrelated “spheres”: spectacular and intellectual. Spectacular otium has become a powerful tool of political impact on masses, a method of mobilization and employment, and consequently reducing the content of leisure activity to “bread and sights”, “money and pleasure”, the gradual loss of the majority the ability to perceive leisure as a means of self-development, self-improvement and cultural creation. For members of the Roman intelligentsia leisure activity is, first of all, the luxury of companionship, intelligent conversation and literature classes. However, for the majority of the population, the Roman borrowing of otium graecum didn’t have an introspective, self-absorbed social character, freed from a sense of moral responsibility, it required only an external, leveled assessment, contrary to the individual and spiritual content of culture.
References
Vergіlіy. (1968) Georgіki. Antichna lіteratura: khrestomatіya. (O. Bіletskiy, Ed.). Kyiv: Radyanska Shkola, pp. 433-437 [in Ukrainian].
Vergіlіy. (1968) Yeneїda. Antichna lіteratura: khrestomatіya (O. Bіletskiy, Ed.). Kyiv: Radyanska Shkola, pp. 437-458 [in Ukrainian].
Goratsіy. (1982). Tvori. (A. Sodomori, Trans). Kyiv: Dnіpro [in Ukrainian].
Kassiy Dion Kokkeyyan. (2013). Istoriya kesarey. Knigi LVII-LXIII «Istorii rimlyan» (V. N. Talakha & S. A. Kuprienko, Ed.). Kyiv: Vidavets Kuprієnko S. A. [in Ukrainian].
Kvashnin, V. A. (2006). Zakony o roskoshi v Drevnem Rime epokhi Punicheskikh voyn. Vologda : Rus. [in Russian].
Nemirovskiy, A. (Eds.). (1995). Malye rimskie istoriki. Velley Paterkul. Rimskaya istoriya. Anney Flor. Dve knigi Rimskikh voyn. Lutsiy Ampeliy. Pamyatnaya knizhitsa. M.: Ladomir [in Russian].
Martsial (2000). Epigrammy. (F. Petrovskiy, Trans). Kharkov: Folio ; Moscow: AST [in Russian].
Monteske, Sh. (1955). Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M. P. Baskina (Ed.). Moscow: Gospolitizdat [in Russian].
Ovіdіy, P.N. (1999). Lyubovnі elegії. Mistetstvo kokhannya. Skorbotnі elegії (A. Sodomora, Trans.). Kyiv: Osnovi [in Ukrainian].
Pliniy, Ml. (1950). Pisma Pliniya Mladshego. (A. Dovatur, Trans). Moscow-Leningrad: Nauka [in Russian].
Plutarkh, M. (1961). Sravnitelnye zhizneopisaniya. (M. Grabar-Passek, ed.). Moscow: Akademiya nauk SSSR, pp. 382-407 [in Russian].
Rober Zh.-N. (2004). Rozhdenie roskoshi: Drevniy Rim v pogone za moody. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].
Svetoniy. (1993). Bozhestvennyy Tit. Zhizn dvenadtsati tsezarey. (M. Gasparov, Trans). Moscow: Nauka, pp. 202-207 [in Russian].
Svetoniy. (1993). Domitsian. Zhizn dvenadtsati tsezarey. (M. Gasparov, Trans). Moscow: Nauka, pp. 208-219 [in Russian].
Svetoniy. (1993). Tiberiy. Zhizn dvenadtsati tsezarey. (M. Gasparov, Trans). Moscow: Nauka, pp. 74-100 [in Russian].
Tatsit, P. K. (2001). Annaly; Malye proizvedeniya. Istoriya [per. s lat.]. Moscow: AST; Ladomir [in Russian].
Balsdon, D., & Vyvian, J.P. (2002). Life and leisure in ancient Rome. Phoenix [in English].
Gazda, E. K., & Clarke, J.R. (2016). Leisure and Luxury in the Age of Nero: The Villas of Oplontis Near Pompeii. Kelsey Museum Publication [in English].
Papakonstantinou, Z. (2019). Work and Leisure. A Cultural History of Work in Antiquity. London: Blooms-bury Academic. Retrieved from http: //www.academia.edu/37801972/_Work_and_Leisure_in_E._Lytle_ed._A_Cultural_History_of_Work_in_Antiquity_London_Bloomsbury_Academic_2019 [in English].
Pieper, J. (2010). Leisure the Basis of Culture. Hardcover-Black & White [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).