"LIBUSE" by B. SMETANA IN TERMS of CULTURE THE NATIONAL GLORIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2020.196579Keywords:
, "Libushe" by B. Smetana, cult, culture, national glorification, liturgical foundations of the composition structure, pie-tism by Y.S. Bach.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to highlight the positions of the current side of the Opera concept of "Libushe". It is relevant for the modern creative life of Smetana, where the signs of national glorification are concentrated, indicative, as a principle of expression, for the postmodern and post-postmodern cultural space. The methodology of the research is based on art criticism focusing on the culture of glorification. It comes from the cult instructions in the concept of P. Florensky, developments in the culture of dithyramb in O. Losev, ideas about the religious and cult principles of positive ritual in E. Durkheim. Art criticism in the development of cult installations of B. Asafiev's research considers the principles of consideration of the composition "Libushe" by B. Smetana and defines analytical, historical-descriptive, comparative-stylistic, interdisciplinary-comparative methods. The scientific novelty of the work is as follows: for the first time in the domestic cultural studies and artistic developments focused attention on the cultural phenomenon of worship as part of the expression of the national idea of the composition of the musical-a stage performance called Opera. Conclusions. Generalization of the spiritual-semantic and dramaturgical specifics of "Libushe" Would. B. Smetana allows us to put forward the concept of quasi-liturgical content of the named work. This poetics reveals creative and ideological parallels to the stage performance of "Ruslan and Lyudmila" by M. Glinka as the "Slavic Liturgy". According to B. Asaf'ev, both before Wagner's musical and theatrical heritage and its mythopoetic attitudes and before the Pasion of J. S. Bach-piest, he realized that Lutheranism was in contact with the Byzantine liturgical practice.References
Асафьев Б. Симфонические этюды. Л.: Музыка, 1971. 264 с.
Гегель Г. Лекции по истории философии. URL: https://mybook.ru/author/fridrih-gegel/lekcii-po-istorii-filosofii-2/read/ (дата звернення: 05.09. 2019 р.).
Гудман Ф. Магические символы. М.: Золотой век, 1995. 289 с.
Друскин М. История зарубежной музыки. Вторая половина XIX века. М.: Музыка, 1980. Вып. 4. 528 с.
Каминская-Маркова Е. Н. Методология музыкознания и проблемы музыкальной культурологии. К 50-летию педагогической деятельности. Одесса: Астропринт, 2015. 532 с.
Лосев А. Античная музыкальная эстетика. М.: Музыка, 1960. 194 с.
Маркова Е. Интонационность музыкального искусства. Киев: Музична Україна, 1990. 182 с
Муравська О.В. Східнохристиянська парадигма європейської культури і музика XVIII-XX століть: мо-нографія. Одеса: Астропринт, 2017. 564 с.
Уилсон-Диксон Э. История христианской музыки. СПб.: Мирт, 2003. 428 с.
Pahlen K. Das neue Opernlexikon. München: Seehamer Verlag, 2000. 1023 S.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).