Features of «composer-listener» interaction in choral performance

Authors

  • Iryna Bermes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2020.220550

Keywords:

communication, composer, conductor, choir, listener.

Abstract

Purpose of the article. To reveal the peculiarities of the communicative process in the «composer – listener» link in the choral activity. Methodology. The principles of cognition, reflected in the systematic, knowledge-based, performing approaches constitute the theoretical and methodological basis of the article, the combination of which allows identifying the most problematic aspects of the phenomenon of communication in choral performance, namely in the interaction of its main participants: a composer, a conductor, choir, listeners in particular. Scientific novelty. The article describes important signs of the conductor’s communication with the choir in the following links: composer-conductor, conductor – choral work, conductor – choir , conductor – listener; the role of a conductor – the main subject of communication, ensuring the information exchange between its participants. Conclusions. Based on the study of theoretical sources and generalization of hands-on experience, the main aspects of communication in choral performance were identified, taking into account the key task of the conductor: skillful, accurate, convincing «reading» of the score, the study and sounding of which requires general and musical knowledge, psychological and pedagogical competence, conductor’s abilities and skills.

References

Ananev, B. (1999). Tasks of the psychology of art. Psychology of artistic creativity. Minsk: Harvest [in Belarusian].

Asafev, B. (1971). Musical form as a process. Leningrad : Muzyka [in Russian].

Bagrynovskyj, M. (1963). Bases of conducting technique. Moskva: MOSKVA [in Russian].

Bermes, I. (2008). Conductor’s art: polyfunctional measurements. Drogobych: VRV DDPU im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian].

Ginzburg, L. (1981). Favorites. Moskva: Sovetskiy kompozitor [in Russian].

Erzhemskiy, G. (1993). Patterns and paradoxes of conducting. Sankt-Peterburg: Dean [in Russian].

Zhivov, V. (2003). Choral performance. Theory. Methodology. Practice. Moskva : VLADOS [in Russian].

Ivanov, K. (1983). The magic of music. Moskva: Molodaya gvardiya [in Russian].

Kagan, M. (1996). Culture philosophy. Sankt-Peterburg: Metropolis [in Russian].

Kazachkov, S. (1998). The choir conductor is an artist and teacher. Kazan: Izd-vo Kazanskoy gos. кonservatorii [in Tatar].

Kogoutek, Ts. (1976). Technique composition in the twentieth century. Moskva: Muzуka [in Russian].

Kolessa, M. (1973). Fundamentals of conducting technique. Kyiv: Musical Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

Korsаkova, I. Musical communication: genesis and historical and cultural transformations. Retrieved from http: //files.msuc.org/diss/04/korsakova_dis.pdf.pdf [in Russian].

Mazel, L. (1978). Questions analysis of music. The experience of the convergence of theoretical musicology and aesthetics. Moskva: Sovetskiy kompozitor [in Russian].

Medushevskiy, V. (1976). On the laws and means of artistic impact of music. Moskva: Muzуka [in Russian].

Morozov, V. (1995). Non-verbal communication. Psychological Journal. (Vol. 14), (№ 2), (pp. 18‒31) [in Russian].

Musin, I. (1967). Conducting technique. Leningrad: Muzyka [in Russian].

Olhov, K. (1979). Questions of the theory of conducting technique and teaching choir conductors. Leningrad: Muzyka [in Russian].

Pazovskiy, A. (1975). Notes conductor. Conductor performance: Practice. Theories. Aesthetics. L.Ginzburg (Ed.). Moskva: Muzуka [in Russian].

Rubinshteyn, S. (2016). Basics of General Psychology. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Stanislavskiy, K. (2016). Actor’s work on himself. Moskva: AST [in Russian).

Tremzina, O. (2014). Conductor’s gesture as an artistic phenomenon. Candidate’s thesis. Saratov [in Russian].

Bulez, P. (2005). Landmarks. Volume III. Music lessons: two decades of teaching at the College of France (1976–71995). Parizh: Vidavets Kristian Burgua [in French].

Issue

Section

Musical art