Actor’s technique as a fundamental guideline for cognition and improving the nature of the professional activity

Authors

  • Nina Gusakova
  • Valeria Shtefyuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2020.220595

Keywords:

theater, actor, actor’s technique, acting training.

Abstract

Purpose of Article. Identify the main components of the actor’s technique, its role in the process of improving the professional activity of the performer, create a classification benchmark for professional competencies masters of stage art, and to characterize the features of acting equipment in work on multi-genre stage works. Methodology. The research methodology consists in the usage of art a method for the general simplification of an artist as a cultural phenomenon; a systemic method for interpreting acting techniques as the holistic design of the functioning of the acting craft; the analytical method for explaining the role and importance of acting technique as the fundamental landmark of cognition and improvement of the nature of acting professionalism; the axiomatic method for constructing logical provisions on the application of acting training as a postulate of mastery performance, as a basic professional method for, an appropriate understanding of the meaning and pragmatic characteristics, the usage of training exercises and tasks in stage technique of an actor. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the study is to analyze the main components of the actor’s technique through the prism of sequential classification of professional competencies and differentiation actor’s internal and external technology in working on multi-genre dramatic creations. Conclusions. As a result of the study, we can conclude that the improvement of the acting professionalism and successful mastery is possible only with the dialectical interaction and interpenetration of three main factors: constant appeal to creative achievements and acquisitions of outstanding scenes of the past; practical knowledge of the latest acting techniques; effective and productive implementation of the performance of the role that foresees the creation of an appropriate image, its character, and nature of scenic existence.

References

Wilson G. (2001). Psychology of Artistic Activities: Talents and fans, translated from English I. Blaze, Moscow: Kogito Center,338 [in Russian].

Gippius S.V. (2010). Gymnastics of the senses. Acting training, St. Petersburg: Veda Publishing House, 378 [in Russian].

Golubovsky B.G. (1986). Plastic in the art of an actor. Moscow: Art, 189 [in Russian].

Donchenko N.P. (2016). The role of etiquette in professional training as a specialist scenic mystery and creativity of the artist of the exercise journal, News National Academic Cadres of Culture and Mystery: Sciences. Magazine. Kyiv: Millennium, No. 4, 70-74 [in Ukrainian].

Klekovkin O.YU. (2012). Theatrica: Lexicon; Int problems now. mystery UA Ukraine. Kyiv: Fenix, 800 [in Ukrainian].

Morozova G.V. (1998). Plastic education of the actor. Moscow: Terra. Sport, 240 [in Russian].

Cherkassky S.D. (2016). Actor's skill: Stanislavsky - Boleslavsky - Strasberg: History. Theory. Practice. St. Petersburg, 816 [in Russian].

Issue

Section

Stage art