Development of pedagogical conditions of a future educator’s training to art and speech activities of preschoolers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.109170

Keywords:

technology of training of a future educator, art and speech activity, preschoolers

Abstract

Pedagogical conditions of realization of the technology of training of a future educator to the organization of art-speech activity of preschool children were determined in this research, according to the culturological, activity, hermeneutic and creative scientific approaches: 

а) creation of the emotional-creative context of students’ training to the organization of art-speech children’s activity.

b) students’ dipping into the active-creative art-speech activity;

c) support of integration of types of art-speech activity in the professional training of a future educator;

d) introduction of pedagogical practices of tasks on the development of art-speech activity of preschoolers into curriculums; 

e) use of text-centrism in the training of a future educator to the art-speech activity of preschoolers.

The following methods of the technology realization were characterized:

а) empathy (self-association);

b) solution of розв’язання педагогічних ситуацій;

c) staging and dramatization;

d) business game;

e) projects;

f) ETT methods (method of tests and mistakes, methods of morphological analysis, synectics method, method of control tasks, method of focal objects);  

g) activity research;

h) pedagogical diary

i) intervision;

j) work with texts.

It was accented on the fact that the technology realization becomes possible due to the introduction of such forms of the work with students as an interactive lecture and training. Future educators study at them:

а) to formulate pedagogical maxims;

b) to compose papers by different bases;

c) to create child fairy tales, sink vanes, verses; 

d) to realize observations and recording of child dialogues;

e) to perform interactive plays for children, to organize literature projects;

f) to solve pedagogical situations and methodological tasks;

g) to develop and to carry out integrated activities on the base of art synthesis.

There was substantiated the necessity of observing separated pedagogical conditions at each stage of the developed technology (conceptual, content, procedural)

Author Biography

Maria Batio, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University Oboronna str., 2, Luhansk, Ukraine, 91011

Department of preschool and initial education 

References

  1. Holota, N. M. (2000). Formuvannia khudozhnikh i konstruktyvnykh umin u maibutnikh vykhovateliv doshkilnykh zakladiv. Kyiv, 21.
  2. Anishchuk, A. M. (2008). Pedahohichni umovy optymizatsii protsesu movlennievoho samovyrazhennia doshkilnykiv riznoi stati. Kyiv, 20.
  3. Polishchuk, O. V. (1996). Pidhotovka studentiv do estetychnoho vykhovannia doshkilnykiv zasobamy ukrainskoho narodnoho dekoratyvno-prykladnoho mystetstva. Kyiv, 24.
  4. Levinets, N. V. (2007). Formuvannia profesiinoi hotovnosti maibutnikh vykhovateliv do zdiisnennia fizychnoho vykhovannia doshkilnykiv na zasadakh narodnykh tradytsii. Kyiv, 20.
  5. Trubnyk, I. V. (2009). Pidhotovka maibutnikh vykhovateliv do formuvannia ekolohichno motyvovanoi povedinky starshykh doshkilnykiv. Yalta, 21.
  6. Zalizniak, A. M. (2009). Pidhotovka maibutnikh vykhovateliv do roboty z batkamy z moralnoho vykhovannia ditei starshoho doshkilnoho viku. Kyiv, 22.
  7. Kondratenko, R. V. (2009). Formuvannia hotovnosti maibutnikh vykhovateliv doshkilnykh navchalnykh zakladiv do vykhovannia vidpovidalnosti u ditei starshoho doshkilnoho viku. Cherkasy, 20.
  8. Makarova, V. N. (1996). Formirovanie gotovnosti studentov k rabote po razvitiyu rechi detey doshkol'nogo vozrasta. Moscow, 196.
  9. Illarionova, T. V. (2001). Formirovanie gotovnosti studentov k razvitiyu slovesnogo tvorchestva detey doshkol'nogo vozrasta. Orenburg, 175.
  10. Sherbakova, T. I. (2000). Osobennosti cennostnogo formirovaniya studenta. Kharkiv: Mova, 163.
  11. Katsova, L. I. (2005). Formuvannia profesiinoho interesu u maibutnikh uchyteliv u protsesi pedahohichnoi praktyky. Kharkiv, 202.
  12. Mey, R., Maslou, A., Feyfel, G. et. al.; Mey, R. (Ed.) (2001). Ekzistencial'naya psihologiya. Moscow: Aprel'-press: EKSMO, 619.
  13. Dreyfus, X. (1978). Chego ne mogut vychislitel'nye mashiny. Moscow: Nauka, 261.
  14. Verbickiy, A. A. (1991). Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshey shkole: kontekstnyy podhod. Moscow: Vysshaya skola, 207.
  15. Bondarenko, H. L., Martynenko, S. M. (2013). Osoblyvosti pidhotovky maibutnoho vchytelia pochatkovoi shkoly do movlennievo-rytorychnoi diialnosti. Ridna mova: osvitnii kvartalnyk Ukr. vchytel. t-va u Polshchi, 19, 82–87.
  16. Linnik, O. O. (2016). Systema pidhotovky maibutnoho vchytelia do orhanizatsii subiekt-subiektnoi vzaiemodii z uchniamy pochatkovoi shkoly. Starobilsk, 520.
  17. Sidorova, I. S. (2013). Formuvannia estetychnoi kultury studentiv pedahohichnykh universytetiv u pozaaudytornii khudozhnii diialnosti. Uman, 200.
  18. Bohush, A., Havrysh, N., Kotyk, T. (2006). Metodyka orhanizatsii khudozhno-movlennievoi diialnosti ditei u doshkilnykh navchalnykh zakladakh. Kyiv: Slovo, 302.
  19. Selevko, G. K. (1998). Sovremennye obrazovatel'nye tekhnologi. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie, 256.
  20. Dychkivska, I. M. (2004). Innovatsiini pedahohichni tekhnolohii. Kyiv: Akademvydav, 352.
  21. Kraevskiy, V. V. (1977). Problemy nauchnogo obosnovaniya obucheniya: metodologicheskiy analiz. Moscow: Pedagogika, 264.
  22. Linnik, O. O., Sazonova, A. V. (2009). Suchasni interaktyvni tekhnolohii metodychnoi pratsi z pedahohichnymy kadramy. Vykhovatel-metodyst doshk. zakl., 8, 21–28.
  23. Havrysh, N. V. (2002). Rozvytok movlennievo-tvorchoi diialnosti v doshkilnomu dytynstvi. Kyiv, 438.
  24. Krupnik, E. N. (1999). Psihologicheskoe vozdeystvie iskusstva. Moscow: In-t psihologii RAN, 240.
  25. Danilyuk, A. Ya. (2000). Teoriya integracii obrazovaniya. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rost. ped. un-ta, 440.
  26. Prokofieva, M. Yu. (2008). Intehratsiia pedahohichnoi pidhotovky maibutnikh vykhovateliv doshkilnykh zakladiv i vchyteliv pochatkovykh klasiv. Odessa, 320.
  27. Komarova, T. S., Zacepina, M. B. (2010). Integraciya v sisteme vospitatel'no-obrazovatel'noy raboty detskogo sada. Moscow: MOZAIKA-SINTEZ, 144.
  28. Cherdanceva, A. P. (2011). Integrirovannoe obuchenie doshkol'nikov: filosofskiy i psihologo-pedagogicheskiy aspekt. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya. Perm': Merkuriy, 1, 90–92.
  29. Chumicheva, R. M., Platohina, M. A. (2011). Upravlenie doshkol'nym obrazovaniem. Moscow: Akademiya, 400.
  30. Komar, O. A. (2011). Teoretychni ta metodychni zasady pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv pochatkovoi shkoly do zastosuvannia interaktyvnoi tekhnolohii. Uman, 512.
  31. Gershunskiy, B. S. (1996). Mentalitet i obrazovanie v sisteme cennostey i prioritetov XXI veka. Moscow: In-t prakt. psihologii, 432.
  32. Sherban, P. M. (2004). Navchalno-pedahohichni ihry u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh. Kyiv: Vyshcha shk., 207.
  33. Bahtin, M. M. (1986). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 445.

Published

2017-08-31

How to Cite

Batio, M. (2017). Development of pedagogical conditions of a future educator’s training to art and speech activities of preschoolers. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (8 (16), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.109170

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education