The role of teams games tournaments (TGT) against activity of learning elementary school students

Authors

  • Selia Wahyu Kaeksi Yogyakarta State University Colombo str., 1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Depok District, Sleman Regency, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281, Indonesia
  • Farida Agus Setiawati Yogyakarta State University Colombo str., 1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Depok District, Sleman Regency, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0099-9179

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.179145

Keywords:

Teams, Games, Tournaments, Activity, Learning, Students, Elementary School, Model

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain theoretically about the role of teams games tournaments ( TGT ) on the learning activities of elementary school students .

Many factors influence the success of primary school students including the activeness of students in participating in learning. To optimize the activity of learning an appropriate learning model is needed. The right learning model is expected to develop its critical thinking skills and be able to actively participate during the learning process. Through the TGT learning model can train students to think critically in tournaments and quizzes. And student learning activities can be built through group learning in teams. This is reinforced by previous studies using the TGT model for critical thinking skills, the results show an increase, or in other words the effectiveness of critical thinking skills using the TGT model has increased.

Based on the discussion of theoretical studies that have been presented theoretically reviews : teams games tournaments ( TGT ) have a role in the activity of learning in elementary school students

Author Biographies

Selia Wahyu Kaeksi, Yogyakarta State University Colombo str., 1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Depok District, Sleman Regency, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281

Primary Education, Postgraduate Program

Farida Agus Setiawati, Yogyakarta State University Colombo str., 1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Depok District, Sleman Regency, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281

Faculty of Education

References

  1. Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38 (10), 1064–1069. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2016.1173661
  2. Kalina, C., Powell, K. C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130 (2), 241–250.
  3. Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44 (5), 464–479. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x
  4. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50 (2), 315–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315
  5. Van Wyk, M. M. (2011). The Effects of Teams-Games-Tournaments on Achievement, Retention, and Attitudes of Economics Education Students. Journal of Social Sciences, 26 (3), 183–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2011.11892895
  6. Holt, J. C. (1989). Learning all the time. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  7. Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (5), 613–642. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
  8. Sudjana, N., Rivai, A. (2005). Media pembelajaran. Bsndung: Sinar Baru.
  9. Djamarah, S. B., Zain, A. (2002). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  10. Nasution, S. (2000). Berbagai pendekatan dalam proses belajar dan mengajar. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 223.
  11. Khalistyawati, M., Muhyadi, M. (2018). Pengaruh model STAD dan jigsaw terhadap karakter kerja sama, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan hasil belajar kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 8 (2), 187–205.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-08

How to Cite

Kaeksi, S. W., & Setiawati, F. A. (2019). The role of teams games tournaments (TGT) against activity of learning elementary school students. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (5 (32), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.179145

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education