Teacher readiness to implement learning through play in Ukrainian primary schools: a preliminary study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2022.264230Keywords:
primary school, school reform, professional readiness, professional identity, learning through playAbstract
The article examines the problem of teachers' professional readiness to implement play-based, activity-based learning methods and the “learning through play” approach in Ukrainian primary schools in the context of holistic reform of school education - the introduction of the New Ukrainian School Concept.
The modern school reform, which was introduced in 2018, brought changes to all aspects of education in Ukraine, however, it was mainly focused on the approach of teaching and learning. A new educational strategy based on the integrative approach of “learning through play”, which combines the principles and methods of active learning, experimental learning and guided discovery learning, inquiry learning, problem-based and project-based learning, and Montessori pedagogy, was introduced in the professional activity of primary school teachers.
The results of the conducted research indicate that the vast majority of interviewed Ukrainian primary school teachers showed an insufficient level of professional readiness for the introduction of play-based and activity-based learning methods due to: a negative attitude to play in education; their insufficient awareness of the developmental, didactic and other functions of the play in the comprehensive development of a person at all stages of his/her life; the dominance of an authoritarian style of communication with students, etc. It was found, that there is an apparent contradiction between the predominantly high level of self-esteem of primary school teachers of their own readiness to implement play-based learning methods and a negative attitude towards the need to change their professional activity.
The difficulties, revealed by the results of the research, provide the basis to make corrections in the system of higher and postgraduate pedagogical education in order to develop Ukrainian school education based on the principles of priority of the individual needs of the child, the competence approach, partnership and a safe educational environment
References
- Winthrop, R., McGivney, E., Barton, A. (2017). Can we Leapfrog? The potential of educational innovations to rapidly accelerate progress. Centre for Universal Education at Brookings. Washington. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED583015.pdf
- Nova ukrainska shkola: poradnyk dlia vchytelia (2018). Kyiv: Litera LTD, 207.
- Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S. (2019). Learning through play at school. A study of playful integrated pedagogies that foster children’s holistic skills development in the primary school classroom. White paper. The LEGO Foundation, 75.
- Pyle, A., Danniels, E. (2016). A Continuum of Play-Based Learning: The Role of the Teacher in Play-Based Pedagogy and the Fear of Hijacking Play. Early Education and Development, 28 (3), 274–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
- Walsh, G., McGuinness, C., Sproule, L. (2019). ‘It’s teaching … but not as we know it’: using participatory learning theories to resolve the dilemma of teaching in play-based practice. Early Child Development and Care, 189 (7), 1162–1173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1369977
- Zosh, J. M., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Solis, S. L., Whitebread, D. (2017). Learning through play: A review of the evidence. White paper. The LEGO Foundation, 40.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Jay, J., Knaus, M. (2018). Embedding Play-Based Learning into Junior Primary (Year 1 and 2) Curriculum in WA. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (1), 112–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n1.7
- Goodson, I. F., Ümarik, M. (2019). Changing policy contexts and teachers´ work-life narratives: the case of Estonian vocational teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 25 (5), 589–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1664300
- Fisher, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Singer, D. G., Berk, L.; Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.) (2011). Playing around in school: Implications for learning and educational policy. Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of the development of play. Oxford University Press, 341–360. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195393002.013.0025
- Elkonin, D. B. (1989). Razmyshleniia o perestroike sovetskoi sistemy obrazovaniia. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Pedagogika, 94–121.
- Lerner, I. Ya. (1991). Pressure points of the learning process. Soviet Pedagogy, 5, 24–29.
- Hura, O. I. (2006). Psykholoho-pedahohichna kompetentnist vykladacha vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi aspekt. Zaporizhzhia: HU ZIDMU, 322.
- Shchudlo, S., Zabolotna, O., Lisova, T. (2018). Ukrainski vchyteli ta navchalne seredovyshche. Rezultaty Vseukrainskoho monitorynhovoho opytuvannia vykladannia ta navchannia sered dyrektoriv i vchyteliv zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv (za metodolohiieiu TALIS). Drohobych: UADO; TzOV «TrekLTD», 20.
- Elkin, O., Masalitina, O., Minkovska I. (2019). Navchaty i navchatysia: yak i kudy zrostaty ukrainskomu vchytelstvu? Rezultaty doslidzhennia sfery pidvyshchennia kvalifikatsii y sertyfikatsii u ramkakh spilnoi initsiatyvy rukhu EdCamp Ukraine i Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Dim Reklamy, 120.
- Rezapkina, G. V. (2009). Psikhologicheskii portret uchitelia: opyt samodiagnostiki. Psikhologiia i shkola, 1, 64–75.
- Povarenkov, Iu. P., Grigoreva, A. A. (2014). Problemy realizatcii meropriiatii profilaktiki upotrebleniia psikhoaktivnykh veshchestv v razlichnykh tipakh obrazovatelnykh uchrezhdenii. Klinicheskaia i meditcinskaia psikhologiia: issledovaniia, obuchenie, praktika, 4 (6). Available at: http://medpsy.ru/climp/2014_4_6/article04.php
- Mardell, B., Lynneth Solis, S., Bray, O. (2019). The state of play in school: defining and promoting playful learning in formal education settings. International Journal of Play, 8 (3), 232–236. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2019.1684157
- Biesta, G., Priestley, M., Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21 (6), 624–640. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
- Garner, J. K., Kaplan, A. (2018). A complex dynamic systems perspective on teacher learning and identity formation: an instrumental case. Teachers and Teaching, 25 (1), 7–33. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811
- Halvorsen Ø. W., Eide L., Ulvik M. (2019). Extension and remodeling of teachers’ perceived professional space. Teachers and Teaching, 25, 1030–1042. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1702519
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tetiana Gura, Oleksandr Gura, Patricia Castanheira, Oksana Roma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
