The essential analysis of the levels of methodologizing of scientific and professional social work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.94254

Keywords:

methodology, methodologizing, methodological work, methodologizing levels, social work, professionalism

Abstract

The article actualizes the importance of methodology that is an inalienable component of scientific searches, is able to define the most important thoughts of theoreticians and practicians in the process of mastering new knowledge, makes the complicated theories and concepts possible and distinctly structurizes them, elaborates the methods and means for the solution of scientific pedagogical problems. It was grounded, that methodologizing is for the scientist-theoretician in social work the way of realization of reflexive activity as to the study of given social object, the process of intensive use of complicated system of approaches, paradigms and instruments for the comprehension of social phenomena, the spiritual-practical mastering of surrounding social world: from the cognition of object to self-cognition and self-creation. There was described the metasystem activity of social workers that starts from socially organized collective thinking of the group, participating in cognition of the world of ideal essences of social object to the common thoughts-communications, connected with verbal-written texts and up to the pure thinking, manifested in non-verbal schemes, formulas, graphs, tables and so on. It was proved, that the top level of professional methodologizing in social sphere, as a result of developmental professional-scientific work, is the methodological activity that is completely elucidated at six levels of methodologizing

Author Biography

Liliya Rebukha, Ternopil National Economic University Lvivska str., 11, Ternopil, Ukraine, 46020

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Psychology And Social Work

References

  1. Schedrovytskyy, G. P. (2000). Metodologichna organizacija sfery psyhologiji. Psyhologija i Suspil’stvo, 2, 7–24.
  2. Stjopin, V.; Furman, A. V. (Ed.) (2015). Naukova racionalnist u tehnogennij kulturi: typy ta istorychna evoljucija. Vol. 2. Systema suchasnyh metodologij. Ternopil: TNEU, 5–10.
  3. Rac, M. (2005). Mesto normirovanija i ego strategija v procesah razvitija. Kentavr, 35, 7–13.
  4. Rebukha, L. Z. (2005). Osoblyvosti metodologuvannja pid chas provedennja psyhologichnoji ekspertyzy. Vitakul’turnyj mlyn, 54–57.
  5. Melnychuk, I. (2011). Teorija i praktyka profesijnoji pidgotovky majbutnih social’nyh procivnykiv zasobamy interaktyvnyh tehnologij [The theory and practice of training of future social workers by the means of interactive technologies]. Ternopil, 584.
  6. Furman, A. V. (2016). Ideja i zmist profesijnogo metodologuvannja [Idea and content of professional metodologizing]. Ternopil: TNEU, 378.
  7. Schedrovytskyy, G. P. (1997). Filosofija. Nauka. Metodologija. Moscow: Shkola. kult. Politiki, 656.
  8. Zinchenko, A. P. (1994). K programme rabot po teme “Shemy i mehanizmy shematizaciji v misljedejatelnosti”. Kentavr, 1, 3–8.
  9. Furman, A. (2005). Rivni ta kriteriji metodologyvannia u profesijnomu zdijsnenni naukovo-doslidnoji dijal’nosti. Vitakul’turnyj mlyn, 5–13.
  10. Tyuptya, L. T., Ivanova I. B. (2008). Social’na robota: teorija i praktyka [Social work: theory and practice]. Kyiv: Znannja, 574.

Published

2017-02-28

How to Cite

Rebukha, L. (2017). The essential analysis of the levels of methodologizing of scientific and professional social work. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (2 (10), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.94254

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education