Leadership in the context of evolution of approaches to understanding the phenomenon in education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2016.76221

Keywords:

leadership, leader, personal oriented leadership, process oriented leadership, educational institutionи

Abstract

In the article are determined the directions of evolution of approaches to understanding the essence and content of leadership: from the ones, oriented on separation of the determining role of guider-leader to the ones, oriented on social process, based on the deepening of interconnections and interactions in collective, attainment of the common aims of leader and followers, ability to changes and innovations. There is observed evolution of the leadership theory, from the model with one component – “guider-leader” to the one of two components “guider-leader – followers”, and further to the formula with three components “leader-followers – managerial process”. Exactly within this triangle is offered to identify the essence and content on the notion “leadership”, to create the programs of preparation and improvement of qualification of the guiders in educational branch, directed on formation of their competences, behavior styles and on training of the team behavior in collective. In the article is stated that the leadership is available to any person in organization, it is not a prerogative of only guider, formally appointed to the post. Leadership is not concentrated on the concrete posts or roles, it is dynamic and can transfer from the one person to the other, and as a consequence the power distance between leaders and followers is reduced. In this connection the object of research of leadership is displaced from the TOP-level to the middle and low links of the management. As a result there is a need to study leadership as a mass egalitarian phenomenon

Author Biography

Костянтин Олександрович Линьов, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Bulvarno-Kudriavska str., 18/2, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053

PhD Public Administration Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Management

References

  1. Rost, J. (1993). Leadership for the Twenty-first Century. Greenwood Publishing Group, 220.
  2. Project Law of Ukraine “About Education” (2016). Verhovna Rada Ukrai'ny, 974-VIII. Available at: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=57141
  3. Project Concept of Education Development for the period 2015–2025 years. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrai'ny. Available at: http://old.mon.gov.ua/ua/pr-viddil/1312/1390288033/1414672797/
  4. Bass, B. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Free Press, 1536.
  5. Ashby, M. D., Miles, S. A. (Eds.) (2002). Leaders Talk Leadership: Top Executives Speak Their Minds. NY: Oxford University Press, Inc., 257.
  6. Hunter, J. (1998). The Servant: a Simple Story About the True Essence of Leadership. Roseville, California: Prima Publishing, 189.
  7. Tichy, N. (2002). The Cycle of Leadership. How Great Leaders Teach Their Companies to Win. Harper Collins e-books, 464.
  8. Eliot, J., Saimon, W. (2012). Steve Jobs: uroki liderstva [Steve Jobs: Leadership Lessons]. Мoscow: Eksmo, 336.
  9. Ulrich, D., Smallwood, N. (2013). Leadership Sustainability: Seven Disciplines to Achieve the Changes Great Leaders Know They Must Make. McGraw-Hill Education, 288.
  10. Avery, G. (2011). Understanding Leadership, Paradigmsand Cases. SAGE Publications Ltd., 300. doi: 10.4135/9781446215487
  11. Yevtichov, O. V. (2007). Strategii I priemy liderstva: teorii I praktika [Strategies and Leadership Methods: Theory and Practice].Sankt-Petersburg: Rech, 238.
  12. Kalashnikova, S. (2010). Osvitnia paradygma professionalizaciyi upravlinnia na zasadah liderstva [Educational Paradigm of Professionalization of Management on the Basis of Leadership]. Kyiv: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 380.
  13. Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15 (2), 251–289. doi: 10.1177/014920638901500207
  14. Foskett, N., Lumby, J. (2003). Leadingand Managing Education: International Dimensions. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 240. doi: 10.4135/9781446221013
  15. Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the Transformational Nature of Instructional Leadership. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLII (4), 325–344.
  16. Caldwell, B. J., Spinks, J. M. (2013). The Self-TransformingSchool. UK: Routledge, 232.
  17. Saleh, I. M., Swe Khine, M. (2014). Reframing Transformational Leadership: New School Culture and Effectiveness. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 120.
  18. Nigel, B., Lesley, A. (Eds.) (2003). Rethinking Educational Leadership Challenging the Conventions. London: SAGE Publications, 206.
  19. English, F. W. (2003). The challenge of postmodernism to the theory and practice of educational administration. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher, LTD., 292.
  20. Giancola, J. M., Hutchison, J. K. (2005). Transforming the culture of school leadership: Humanizingourpractice. Corwin Press, 224.
  21. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed School Leadership: Developing Tomorrow's Leaders. UK: Routledge, 192.
  22. Wallace, R. (2009). The Servant Leader and High School Change: More Lessons from Principal to Principal. Rowman Littlefield Education, 104.
  23. Day, D. V., Antonakis, J. (Eds.) (2012). Thenature of leadership. SAGE Publications, 608.
  24. Northouse, P. G. (2015). Introduction to Leadership: Conceptsand Practice. SAGE Publications, Inc., 352.
  25. Yukl, G. (2010). LeadershipinOrganizations. Pearson, 644.
  26. Asghar, R. Ranking The 9 Toughest Leadership Roles. Forbes. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/robasghar/2014/02/25/ranking-the-9-toughest-leadership-roles/
  27. Western, S.; Preedy, M., Bennettand, N., Wise, C. (Eds.) (2012). An Overview of the Leadership Discourses. Educational Leadership: Context, Strategy and Collaboration. SAGE Publications, 23–35.
  28. School leader ship: concepts and evidence (2003). National College for School Leadership, 42. Avaialble at: http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5119/14/dok217-eng-School_Leadership_Concepts_and_Evidence_Redacted.pdf
  29. Lynch, M. (2012). A Guideto Effective School Leadership Theories. NY: Routledge, 232.
  30. Gardner, J. (2013). The Nature of Leadership. The Jossey-Bass Readeron Educational Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A WileyBrand, 39–47.
  31. Boyett, J.,Boyett, J. (2009). Putevoditel po tsarstvu mudrosti: luchshye idei masterov upravleniya [The Guru Guide: The Best Ideas of the Top Management Thinkers]. Мoscow: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes», 416.
  32. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Buckingham: Open University Press, 266.
  33. Bush, T. (2011). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. London: SAGE Publications, Inc., 232.
  34. Lambert, L. (2002). A Frame work for Shared Leadership. Educational Leadership: Beyond Instructional Leadership, 59 (8), 37–40. Available at: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/may02/vol59/num08/A-Framework-for-Shared-Leadership.aspx
  35. Brendon, B. (2009). The Student Leadership Guide. Morgan James Publishing, 284.
  36. Lynov, К. (2015). Pidgotovka kerivnyka zakladu serednoyi osvity v universytetah Ukrayiny na zasadah liderstva [Training of Secondary Education Principals on the Basis of Leadership]. Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny: Teoretychnyi ta naukovo-metodychnyi chasopys, 3, 128–132.
  37. Bolden, R., Petrov, G., Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in Higher Education Leadership: Towards a Multi-Level Model of Leadership Practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62 (4), 358–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00398.x

Published

2016-08-30

How to Cite

Линьов, К. О. (2016). Leadership in the context of evolution of approaches to understanding the phenomenon in education. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (8 (4), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2016.76221

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education