Variability and correlation of economic features in varieties in spring barleycultivars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2017.120414Keywords:
spring barley, yield capacity, protein content, 1000-grain weight, correlation, variation, determination, fulfillment of the potentialAbstract
The aim and tasks of the study. The objective of our study was to determine the variability of valuable economic features in spring barley cultivars and to evaluate correlations between them.
Material and methods. The study was carried out in the Plant Production Institute named after VYaYuriev of NAAS in 2006–2016. Eight barley spring cultivarsbred in the Plant Production Institute nd. aVYaYurievNAAS and at the Plant Breeding and Genetics Institute were taken as starting material. The experiments were laid out in variety trial nurseries; the plot area was 10 m2. Statistical processing was carried out as BA Dospekhov described [30], using the programs STATISTICA 10 and Excel. The fulfillment of the yield potential was determined by ED Nettevich [31].
Results and discussion. The multi-year study found that the yield (V = 22.45–35.94 %) variations were the greatest, protein content (V = 11.65–16.25) – was medium depending on growing conditions. The lowest variability in the yield was recorded for cultivars Parnas (V = 22,45 %), Іnkliuziv (V = 24,22 %) and Vzirets (V = 25.51%).
The variation in the 1000-grain weight was low (V = 6.56–9.43%), that is, the genotype effect on this feature is stronger than on the two previous ones. This is also evidenced by high fulfillment of the cultivar potentials for the 1000-grain weight (85–93%).
A general pattern in the correlation between the studied features was established. Thus, for all the cultivars negative significant correlations were found between the yield capacity and the protein content (r = -0.613 – -0.720), which is consistent with other researchers' results. 37–52% of the protein content is determined by the yield level. The 1000-grain weight positively (though insignificantly) correlates with the yield and negatively with the protein content.
Comparison of the maximum and average yield of cultivars over the 11-year period showed that fulfillment of the yield potential varied from 59% (Vakula) to 68–70% (Vzirets, Badioryi, Inkliuziv), depending on growing conditions.
Conclusions. General patterns of variability in economic features in spring barley cultivars, depending on growing conditions, were established. Cultivars with the lowest variability in yield were detected (Parnas, Inkliuziv and Vzirets). Cultivar Vzirets to the fullest extent possible fulfills its potential for yield and 1000-grain weight. The cultivars selected as the best ones in this study can be used in breeding as starting material or as references for these traits. In addition, the study results should be taken into account in industrial disposition of cultivarsReferences
Genetic basics of plant breeding. General genetics of plants.In: AV Kilchevskiy, LV Khotyleva, editors. Minsk: Belorusskaianauka, 2008. 551 p.
SapegaVA. Yield capacity and parameters of environmental plasticity and stability of spring barley varieties.IzvestiiaOrenburgskogogosudarstvennogoagrarnogouniversiteta. 2015. P. 35–38.
KochmarskyiVS, HudzenkoVM, KavunetsVP. Domesticbarley–newvarietiesthatcanresisttheelementsanddroughts. Zerno, 2010. Availablefrom: www.zerno-ua.com.
BorodyniaAN. Variability of spring barley traits and its use in breeding and seed production in the steppe zone of the Republic of Khakassia. [dissertation]. Barnaul, 2012. 141 p.
Mergalimov DB, Bekenova LV, Shamanin VP. Evaluation of environmental plasticity of spring barley varieties in the North-East of Kazakhstan. Sovremennyie problem nauki I obrazovaniia. 2015: 1(2).
Novruzlu GA, Bayramova DA, Gashymova KhD, Garibov ZA. Current problems of barley breeding in Azerbaijan.Sel. Nasinn. 2015; 108: 60–68.
KosianenkoLP. Influence of Russian bread cereal cultivar changing on increase in the yield capacity in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Availablefrom: www. cgi-bin/irbis64r.
KosianenkoLP. Agro-environmental justification for enhancement in the adaptive potential of chaffy and hulless barley in the near-YeniseySiberia. [dissertation]. Krasnoyarsk, 2008. 32 p.
Ashraf AAbd El-Mohsen. Correlation and regression analysis in barley. Scien. Res. And Review J. 2013; 1(3): 88–100.
Azeb Hailu, Sentayehu Alamarew, Mandefro Nigussie, Emias Assefa. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield associatedtraits in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm. Crop. Sci. Tech. 2016; 4(2). DOI: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000216.
Abdollah Hosinbabaiy, Saed Aharizad, Abdolhasem Mohammadi, Mehrdad Yania. Survey, correlation of yield and yield components in 40 lines barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in Region Tabriz. Middle-East of Scientific Research. 2011; 10(2): 149–152.
Kaya Yuksel, Ayranci Ramazan. Breeding barley for quality in Turkey. Genetika. 2016; 48(1): 173–186. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1601173K.
GriaznovAA. Karabalykskiy barley (forage, groats, beer). Kustanay:Kustanayskiy pechatnyi dvor, 1996. 448p.
Gubanov MV. Starting material for spring barley breeding and prospects for its use in the Northern Trans-Urals. [dissertation]. Tiumen, 2016. 194 p.
KompanetsKV, KozachenkoMR, VaskoNI, NaumovOG, SolonechnyiPM, SviatchenkoSI. Morpho-biological features and correlations of quantitative traits in spring barley varieties. Abstracts of the International Scientific-Practical Conference“Professor SL Frankfurt (1866-1954) is an outstanding researcher, agrobiologist, one of the most effective organizers of the academic science in Ukraine (to the 150thanniversary of his birth)": Kyiv, 18 Nov 2016. Kyiv, 2016. P. 70–73.
Vasko NI. Correlation between yield capacity and1000-grain weight in spring barley varieties. Sel. Nasinn. 2017; 111: 28–39.
Laidig F, Piepho HP, Rentel D, Drobek T, Meyer U. Breeding progress, genotypic and environmental variation and correlation of quality traits in malting barley in German official variety trials between 1983 and 2015. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017; 130(11): 2411–2429. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-2967-4.
Matthies IE, Malosetti M, Roeder MS, Van Eeuwijk F. Genome-wide association mapping for kernel and malting quality traits using historical European barley records. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11). e110046. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110046.
Shengguan Cai, Gang Yu, Xianhong Chen, Yechang Huang, Xiaogamg Jiang, Guoping Zhang, Xiaoli Jin. Grain protein content variation and its association analysis in barley. BMC Plant Biology. 2013; 13: 35. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-35.
Rybalka ОІ, Morgun BV, Polishchuk SS. Barley as a product of functional nutrition. Kyiv: Logos, 2016. 620 p.
Ulrich SE. Genetics and breeding of barley feed quality. In: Barley science: Recent advances from molecular biology to agronomy of yield and quality. Slafer GA, Molina-Cano JL, Savin R, Araus JL, Romagosa I, editors. Haworth Press, Bighamton, NY, 2002. P. 115–142.
Neatby KW, McCalla AG. Correlation between yield and protein content of wheat and barley in relation to breeding. Canadian Journal of Research. 1938; 16c(1): 1–15.
Le Bail M, Meynard JM. Yield and protein concentration of spring malting barley: the effects of cropping systems in the Paris Basin (France). Agronomie. EDR Sciences. 2003; 23(1): 13–27.
Impacts of agriculture on human health and nutrition. In: Cakmak I, Welch RM, editors. Vol. II. Encyclopedia of life support systems. 2009. EDLSS Publichers / UNESCO. P. 120–129.
Yoshida T. Barley genetics newsletter. 1976. Vol. 6. P. 87–89.
Grant MN, McCalla AG. Yield and protein content of wheat and barley. I. Interrelation of yield and protein content of random selections from single crosses. Canadian Journal of Research. 1949; 27c(5): 230–240.
Öztuürk J, Avci R, Kahraman T, Tüulek A, Kaya R, Tuna B. Investigation of yield and some agronomical traits of the barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in Trakya region. Available from: www. iz-karnobat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/11.
Mareniuk OB. Breeding/genetic assessment of starting material of spring barley on increased acidity of soils of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe. [dissertation]. Vinnytsia, 2015. 190 p.
Candrakova E, Macak M. Yield and grain quality of spring barley as affected by soil tillage method and fertilization. Res. J. of Agricultural Science. 2015; 47(1): 45–50.
DospekhovBA. Methods of field experimentation.Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 p.
NettevichED. Potential yield sof spring wheat and barley varieties recommended for cultivation in the Central region of the Russian Federation and its fulfillment under industrial conditions. DokladyRossiyskoyakademiinauk. 2001; 3: 50–55.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Н. І. Васько, М. Р. Козаченко, О. Г. Наумов, П. М. Солонечний, О. Є. Важеніна, О. В. Солонечна, О. В. Зимогляд
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.
