Use of test systems for assessing the total antioxidant activity of seeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2017.120443Keywords:
antioxidants, total antioxidant activity (TAOA), test systems, DPPH •, analysis procedureAbstract
Introduction.The method using the free radical DPPH • is one of the most successful, widespread indirect methods for assessing the total antioxidant activity (TAOA). DPPH • is sufficiently selective and reacts neither with flavonoids that do not contain hydroxyl groups in the B-ring nor with aromatic acids containing only one hydroxyl group. The method is based on the ability of the stable free radical of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH •) to react with proton donors, including phenols.
The aim and tasks of the study. The main objective of this study was to pilott the DPPH test systems for assessing the TAOA of seeds in routine analysis (screening of the plant genetic pool of Ukraine and of breeding material).
Results and discussion. The antiradical activity is determined using the stable radical (DPPH •) as described in [Arabshahi, Urooj, 2007] with minor changes: methanol in elution solution was replaced with non-toxic ethanol; the DPPH concentration was chosen so that the maximum extinction of solutions would not exceed 1.4 units. The light transmission of all solutions was within the linear part of the calibration curve. The reaction time was increased from 30 minutes to 2 hours to reduce the effect of temperature fluctuations in the laboratory (within +13°C - + 30°C) and to increase the number of samples analyzed in one experiment to 32 (in 3 replicas). Having carried out numerous experiments, we adopted the following procedure: seeds were additionally dried in a thermostat at 25°C for 4-5 days; samples were ground in a laboratory mill for 1 minute (3 × 20 sec); weighted amounts of flour (0.5 g each) were placed in vials (with sealing caps); 4.5 ml of 80% ethanol (diluted with distilled water) was added; extraction lastedat room temperature in the dark for 18 to 20 hours; samples were centrifuged (10 min at 3,000 × g) in an OPN-3 centrifuge; 2 ml of supernatants were transferred to clean vials. Ethanol solution of the radical is prepared as follows: dissolve 22 mg of DPPH in 400 ml of 80% ethanol on a magnetic stirrer under diffuse light, small grains of undissolved dye are triturated additionally with a porcelain pestle. The solution is filtered and stored during the day of analysis. Before starting the analysis, the optical density of solution obtained by adding 0.5 ml of 80% ethanol to 3.5 ml of DPPH solution is measured on a spectrophotometer at 517 nm, and if the extinction exceeds 1.4, the solution is further diluted with 80% ethanol so that its extinction will be 1.4 (working solution of DPPH • is approximately 125 μM). 0.5 ml of a seed extract is added to 3.5 ml of working solution of DPPH • at room temperature, mixed rapidly, let to sit for 2 hours in a dark place, and then a change in light absorption of the mixture is recorded. In the control, 3.5 ml of working solution of DPPH is added to 0.5 ml of 80% ethanol. The ability of a sample to neutralize the stable free radical DPPH • (antiradical activity - ARA) is defined as: ARA = (A-B) / A × 100%, where A is the light absorption of the control, B is the light absorption of a sample (2 hours after mixing withe working solution of DPPH •). Chlorogenic acid is taken as the standard of antioxidant activity. TAOA is expressed in mg of chlorogenic acid per 1 g of a sample. If seed are noticeable for very high TAOA, the amount of an extract to be added to DPPH solution should be decreased, for example, 0.2 ml. In this case, a new calibration curve of the standard is plotted.
Conclusions. In recent years, the trend in use of methods for determining antioxidant activity has been gradually shifting towards the development and use of simple and inexpensive methods of evaluation of a large number of biological samples. This is attributed not only to the growing interest both of nutritionists and of dietitian to the search for new sources of valuable functional food products but also to the necessity of screening the plant gene pool in order to identify the most promising for biofortification accessionsReferences
Halliwell B. Antioxidants: the basics – what they are and how to evaluate them.Adv. Pharmacol. 1997; 38:3–20.
Huang D, Ou B, Prior RL. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005; 53: 1841−1856.
Prior RL,Wu X, SchaichK.Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements.J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005; 53(10): 4290–4302.
Číž M, Čížova H, Denev P, Kratchanova M, Slavov A, Lojek A. Different methods for control and comparison of the antioxidant propertiesof vegetables.Food Control. 2010; 21: 518–523.
Aruoma OI. Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in plant foods. Mutation Research. 2003; 523–524: 9–20.
Schlesier K, Harwat M, Bohm V, Bitsch R. Assessment of Antioxidant Activity by Using Different In Vitro Methods. Free Rad. Res. 2002; 36(2): 177–187.
Davies KJA. Oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and damage removal,repair, and replacement systems. IUBM Life. 2000;50(4–5): 279–289.
Prior RL,Hoang H, Gu LW, Wu X, Bacchiocca M, Howard L, Hampsch-Woodill M, Huang D, Ou B, JacobR.Assays for hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capacity (oxygen radicalabsorbance capacity (ORACFL) of plasma and other biological and food samples.J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003; 51(11):3273–3279.
Serrano J, Goñi I, Saura-Calixto F. Food antioxidant capacity determined by chemical methods may underestimate the physiological antioxidant capacity. Food Res. Int. 2007; 40: 15–21.
Roginsky V, Lissi EA. Review of methods to determine chain-breaking antioxidant activity in food. FoodChemistry. 2005; 92: 235–254.
Khasanov VV, Ryzhova GL, Maltseva ЕV. Methods of antioxidant studies. Khimiya rastitelnogo syryia. 2004; 3: 63–75.
Beltyukova SV, Stepanova AA, Liventsova ЕО. Antioxidants in food products and methods for their determination. Visnyk ONU. Khimiia. 19(4-52): 16–31.
Sazhina NN. Determination of antioxidant activity of differentbioactioxidants and their mixtures by amperometry. Khimiya rastitelnogo syryia. 2016; 4: 71–76.
Cao G, Alessio HM, Cutler RG. Oxygen-radical absorbance capacity assay for antioxidants. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 1993; 14: 303−311.
Pellegrini N, Re R, Yang M, Rice-EvansС. Screening of dietarycarotenoids and carotenoid-rich fruit extracts for antioxidant activities applyingthe 2,20-azinobis(3-ethylenebenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cationdecolorization assay. Methods in Enzymology. 1999; 299: 379–389.
Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay: Directmeasure of total antioxidant function of biological fluids and modified versionfor simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acidconcentration.Methods in Enzymology, Oxidants and Antioxidants. 1999;299:15−27.
Ghiselli AA,Serafini M, MaianiG, Azzini E, Ferro-Luzzi A. Аfluorescence-based method for measuring total plasma antioxidant capability.FreeRad. Biol. Med.1995; 18(1): 29–36.
Burlakova EB, Alesenko AV, Molochkina EM, Palmina NP, Khrapova NG. Bioantioxidants in radiation injury and malignant growth.Мoscow: Nauka, 1975.214 p.
TirzitisG,Bartosz G.Determinationofantiradicalandantioxidantactivity: basicprinciplesandnewinsights. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2010; 57: 139–142.
Berker KI, Guclu K, Demirata B, Apak R. A novel antioxidant assay of ferric reducing capacity measurement using ferrozine as the colour forming complexation reagent. Anal. Methods. 2010; 2: 1770–1778.
Apak R, Gorinstein S, Böhm V, Schaich KM, Özyürek M., Güçlü K. Methods of measurement and evaluation of natural antioxidant capacity/activity (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem.2013; 85(5):957–998.
Von Gadov A, Joubert E, Hansmann СF. Comparison of the antioxidant activity of aspalathin with that of other plant phenols of Roobies tea (Aspalathus linearis), α-tocopherol, BHT, and BHA. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997; 45: 632–638.
ArabshahiS,Urooj A.AntioxidantpropertiesofvarioussolventextractsofMulberryMorusindicaL. Leaves. Food Chem. 2007; 102: 1233–1240.
Bonoli M, Verardo V, Marconi E, Caboni MF. Antioxidant phenols in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) flour: comparative spectrophotometric study among extraction methods of free and bound phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004; 52:5195–5200.
ZhouK, Yu L. Effectsofextractionsolventonwheatbranantioxidantactivityestimation.Lebensm.-Wiss. u.-Technol. 2004;37:717−721.
Huang HY, Caballero B, Chang S,Alberg A, Semba R, Schneyer C, Wilson RF, Cheng TY, Prokopowicz G, Barnes GJ 2nd, Vassy J, Bass EB. Multivitamin/mineral supplements and preventionof chronic disease. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. 2006; 139:1–117.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 В. В. Поздняков, А. А. Василенко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.