Levels and variability of valuable economic characteristics of spring barley, depending on genotype and hydrothermal conditions

Authors

  • М. R. Kozachenko Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. V. Zymogliad Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • N. І. Vasko Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • P. М. Solonechnyi Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. E. Vazhenina Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. V. Solonechna Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. G. Naumov Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2020.222266

Keywords:

spring barley, cultivar, line, yield, growing period length, resistance to diseases and lodging, pro-tein and starch contents, trait levels, variability, breeding value

Abstract

Purpose and Objectives. The purpose was to evaluate the yield, the growing period length, resistance to diseases and lodging of spring barley, depending on genotype and hydrothermal conditions, and to select starting material for combining breeding.

Materials and Methods. One six-row cultivar and two-row chaffy and naked cultivars and lines of spring barley were studied. The experiments were conducted in accordance with methods qualifying examination of plant varieties at the Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS in 2018–2020. The plot area was 10 m2, in four replications. Data were statistically processed by analysis of variance in the STATISTICA 10 software; posteriori comparison was performed by homogenous groups (Fisher LSD).

Results and Discussion. It was found that naked accessions gave lower yields compared to the check cultivar Vzirets under any growing conditions. The sample of chaffy accessions was homogeneous in terms of yield, hence, no significant excess was noted, and cultivar Grace was the only one which consistently exceeded the the check cultivar. As to the growing period length, all the accessions under investigation were mid-ripening.

Resistance to lodging was strongly dependent on genotype and weather. In 2020, severe waterlogging combined with low temperatures favored the vegetative mass development and severe lodging. Therefore, in 2020, none of the accessions of the studied sample was completely resistant to lodging. Cultivars Merlin and Krasen can be distinguished by very high or high group resistance to head smut, net blotch and powdery mildew.

Conclusions. The study singled out six cultivars as breeding-valuable ones with a set of economic characteristics (high low-variable yield [11.06–18.59%], resistance to lodging [8.3–8.8 points], high resistance to the pathogens of head smut [7–9 points] and brown spot [6–9 points]): Grace, Khors, Vzirets, Gladys, Krasen, and Herkules. Awnless accessions were identified as sources of resistance to head smut. Line 14-561 called Herkules was submitted to the qualifying examination of plant varieties.

References

Tricase K, Amicarelli V, Lamonaca E, Rana RL. Economic analysis of the barley market and related uses. 2020. URL: www.intechopen.com/books/grases-as-food-and-feed/... DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78967.

Valcheva D, Vulchev D, Popova D, Ozturk I, Kaya R. Productive potential of Bulgarian and Turkish varieties and lines of barley in the conditions of Southeast Bulgaria. Trakiya University Journal of Natural Sciences. 2013; 14(2): 97–102.

Abramova MV, Dubovets ТА, Krotova TA. Trials of spring barley in Central Kazakhstan. Vestnik Altaskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2016; 31(135): 15–19.

Rahimi-Baladezaie R, Nemati NA, Mobasser HR, Ghanbari-Malidarreh A, Dastan S. Effects of sowing dates and CCC application on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in the North of Iran. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 2011; 11(1): 49–54.

Berdin SI, Tkachenko OM. Performance structure of spring barley crops in the North-Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Visnyk Sumskogo NAU. 2013; 11(26): 52–55.

Shaaf S, Bretani G, Biswas A, Fontana IM, Rossini L. Genetics of barley tiller and leaf development. J. of Integrative Plant Biology. 2019; 61(3): 226–256. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.12757.

Dyunderova B, Valcheva D. Heritability, variance components and genetic advance of yield and some yield related traits in barley doubled haploid lines. Turkish J. of Agricultural and Natural Science. 2014; 1: 614–617.

Jalata Z, Ayana A, Zeleke H. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for some yield and yield related traits in Ethiopian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces and crosses. Int. J. of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2011; 5(1): 44–52. DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2011.44.52.

Ahmadi J, Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A. Analysis of variability, heritability and interrelationships among grain yield and related characters on barley advanced lines. Genetika. 2016; 48(1): 73–85. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1601073A.

Shrimali J, Shekhawat AS, Kumari S. Genetic variation and heritability studies for yield and yield components in barley genotypes under normal and limited moisture conditions. J. of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2017; 6(4): 233–235.

Addisu F, Shumet T. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for some yield and yield related traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in Ethiopia. Int. J. of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2015; 9(2): 68–76. DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2015.68.76.

Surin NA, Zobova NV. Improvement of barley adaptability in the breeding process. Sibirskiy vestnik selskokhoziaystvennoy nauki. 2007; 6: 18–24.

Kendal E. GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Journal of Crop Breeding and Genetics. 2016; 2(1): 90–99.

Khanzadeh H, Vaezi B, Mohammadi R, Mehraban A, Hosseinpor T, Shahbazi K. Grain yield stability of barley genotypes in uniform regional yield trails in warm and semi warm dry land area. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2018; 52(1): 16–21. DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.A-290.

Rodina NA. Barley breeding of in the Northeast of the Non-Black Earth Belt. Kirov, 2006. 488 p.

Hudzenko VM, Vasylkivskyi VP. New sources of economically valuable features in spring barley. Agrobiologiia. 2010; 4(80): 5–9.

Hudzenko VM. Combining ability of new spring barley accessions of different eco-geographical origin for quantitative traits in the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP. 2012; 8(30): 1–13.

Noworolnik K. Morphological characters, plant phenology and yield of spring barley (Hordeum sativum L.) depending on cultivar properties and sowing date. Acta Agrobotanica. 2012; 65(2): 171–176.

Křen J, Houšť M, Tvarůžek L, Jergi Z. The effect of stand structure on the grain quality of spring barley. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2019; 4: 205–210. DOI: 10.17221/584/2018-PSE.

Linchevskyi AA. 92 years of barley breeding. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats SGI-NTsNS UAAS. 2008; 12(52): 24–49.

Genetic basics of plant breeding. In 4 volumes. Vol. 1. General genetics of plants. In: AV Kilchevskiy, LV Khotylieva, editors. Minsk: Belorusskaia nauka, 2008. 551 p.

Tokhetova LA, Umirzaka SI, Nurymova RD, Baizhanova BK, Akhmedova GB. Analysis of economic-biological traits of hull-less barley and creation of source material for resistance to environmental stress factors. Internat. J. of Agronomy. 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8847753. URL: www.hindawi.com>ija>2020.

Kirdoglo EK, Shevchenko EP. Barley loose smut harmfulness in the forest-steppe zone of Ukraine. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy bulleten VSGI. 1986; 1(59): 10−16.

Russel RC. Observations on cereal embryos in relation to the «embryo test» for loose smuts. Can. J. ofBotany. 1960; 38(2): 251–257. DOI: 10.1139/b60-023.

MacKey J, Magnus H, Bjornstad A, Tekauz A, Jensen A, Patil V. Near-isogenic lines for resistance to scald (Rhynchosporium secalis) in the barley cultivar Іngrid. Barley Genetics VIII. Australia, 2000. Р. 126−129.

Babayants L, Meshterkhazi F, Vekhter F et al. Methods of breeding and evaluation of wheat and barley for disease resistance in CMEA countries. Praga, 1988. 322 p.

Methods of qualifying examination of plant varieties for suitability for dissemination in Ukraine. The general part. Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, Ukrainian Institute for Plant Varieties Examination, 2016. 117 с.

Methods of examination of plant varieties of cereals, groats crops and grain legumes for suitability for dissemination in Ukraine. Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, Ukrainian Institute for Plant Varieties Examination, 2016. 81 с.

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION