Productivity and resistance to infection by biotic factors of lines - parental components of mayz hybrids when using biopreparations under irrigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2020.222395Keywords:
line, parent component, biological product, affected, disease, yield, productivityAbstract
Purpose and objectives. The purpose was to improve the existing technology of growing parents of innovative maize hybrids on irrigated lands by evaluating the impact of new biologicals on plant diseases, pest infestation and seed yield under irrigation in the Southern Steppe.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted in the experimental field of the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS in 2019–2020. Factor A – parental lines belonging to various ripening groups (DK 445, DK 411, DK 281, and DK 247) included in the pedigree of hybrids Stepovyi, Skadovskyi, Azov, Arabat, Chonhar, Vira, Oleshkivskyi, Hileia and others bred at the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS and the Institute of Grain Crops of NAAS. Factor B - treatment of maize parents with innovative biologicals – Fluorescein BT, Trichopsin BT, Biospectrum BT. The methods were conventional for irrigation conditions and maize breeding studies.
Results and discussion. The studied biologicals had positive effects on resistance to fungal diseases. The development of blister smut (Ustilago zeae Beckm.) on early-ripening line DK 281 was influenced by all the biologicals. Fluorescein BТ reduced the disease incidence by 1.9%; Trichopsin BG – by 3.0%; Biospectrum BT – by 3.2%. The incidence of Fusarium head blight was also decreased by biologicals. Biospectrum BT was the most effective agent. The incidence of Fusarium head blight in the lines decreased by 2.8–4.0%. The lowest incidence of Fusarium wilt was recorded in line DK 247 treated with Biospectrum BT – 8.9%. Corn borer infestation was reduced by Trichopsin BT and Biospectrum BT, which have both insecticide/fungicidal and growth-stimulating effects. The reduction in the incidence was 2.3–2.8%, depending on the genotype of the lines. Treatment with biologicals improved the cob structure of the studied lines. Trichopsin BT and Biospectrum BT had the greatest effects on the cob parameters. Due to Biospectrum BT, the cob length increased by 5.2–6.7%, the cob diameter – by 2.0–4.9%, and the cob grain weight – by 3.0–7.1%. The results of measurement of the yields from the parents (maize lines) showed that under irrigation the average performance of the studied maize lines ranged 3.75 to 6.11 t/ha, depending on the genotype of the lines (factor A) and the use of biologicals.
Conclusions. It was found that biologicals Fluorescein BT, Trichopsin BT, and Biospectrum BT reduced the damage to maize lines induced by blister smut, Fusarium wilt, and corn borer by 0.9–4.2%. Treatment with Biospectrum BT ensured the highest grain yields from the maize parent, which averaged 4.63 t/ha, the gain in the yield was 0.44 t/ha or 10.5%. Treatment with Trichopsin BT had a positive effect on the yield, which averaged 4.54 t/ha, providing a gain in the yield of 0.35 t/ha or of 8.4%. Treatment with Fluorescein BT increased the yield by 0.14 t/ha or by 3.3%. Biospectrum BT was the most effective agent, which provided a significant reduction in the damage to the maize lines caused by fungal diseases and pestsReferences
Krutiakova VI. Biomethod – the basis of sustainable development of the domestic agriculture. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. 2020; 10(5): 14.
Volkohon VV, Zaryshniak AS, Pylypenko LA. Microbial agents in modern agricultural technologies. Kyiv: NAAN.
Krutiakova VI, Tarhonia VS. Multilevel system of certification of organic agricultural production. Biological method of plant protection: achievements and prospects. Informatsiinyi biuleten Skhidno-palearktychnoi rehionalnoi sektsii Mizhnarodnoi orhanizatsii z biolohichnoi borotby zi shkidlyvymy orhanizmamy. 2018; 53: 185–191.
Parnell JJ, Berka R, Young HA. From the lab to the farm: an industrial perspective of plant beneficial microorganisms. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1110. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01110.
Van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, Köh J. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new. BioControl. 2018; 63: 39–59. DOI: 10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4.
Tkalenko H. Biologicals in plant protection. Modern agrotechnologies applying biologicals and growth regulators. Propozytsiia. 2015; Special issue: 2–15.
Lemanova NB, Pіnzaru BV. Potential for the PGPR use in maize cultivation. Biomethod of plant protection: achievements and prospects. Informatsiinyi biuleten Skhidno-palearktychnoi rehionalnoi sektsii Mizhnarodnoi orhanizatsii z biolohichnoi borotby zi shkidlyvymy orhanizmamy. 2018; 53: 191–196.
Kobyzieva LN, Vus NO. Aktualni napriamy ta dosiahnennia svitovoi selektsii sortiv nutu stiikykh do nespryiatlyvykh bio- ta abiotychnykh chynnykiv. Sel. Nasinn. 2016; 110: 67–82. DOI: 10.30835/2413-7510.2016.87609.
Bibel YuO, Chernobai LM, Ponurenko SH, Kuzmyshyna NV, Vakulenko SM. Dynamika volohosti zerna pry dostyhanni linii kukurudzy riznykh hrup styhlosti. Sel. Nasinn. 2020; 117: 8–16. DOI: 10.30835/2413-7510.2020.206932.
Lavrynenko YuO, Vozhegova RA, Hozh OA. Productivity of corn hybrids of different FAO groups depending on microfertilizers and growth stimulants under irrigation in the south of Ukraine. Agricultural science and practice. 2016; 1: 55–60. DOI: 10.31073/agrovisnyk201807-03.
Vozhehova RA, Kokovikhin SV, Lykhovyd PV, Biliaeva IM, Drobitko AV, Nesterchuk VV. Assessment of the CROPWAT 8.0 software reliability for evapotranspiration and crop water requirements calculations. Journal of Water and Land Development. 2018; 39(X–XII): 147–152. DOI: 10.2478/jwld-2018-0070.
Methods of field and laboratory studies on irrigated lands. Kherson: Grin DS, 2014.
Basics of field crop breeding for resistance to harmful organisms. In: VV Kyrychenkoa, V.P. Petrenkova, edit. Kharkiv: NAAS, Plant ProductionInstitute nd. a. VYa Yuriev, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 T. Marchenko, Y. Lavrynenko, M. Kirpa, O. Stasiv
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.