Anti-pest protection of two-year old alfalfa grown for seeds

Authors

  • A. V. Tyshchenko Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS, Ukraine
  • O. D. Tyshchenko Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS, Ukraine
  • G. M. Kuts Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS, Ukraine
  • O. O. Piliarska Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS, Ukraine
  • N. M. Galchenko Askania State Agricultural Experimental Station of the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2021.237163

Keywords:

alfalfa, seeds, insecticides, irrigation, rainfed conditions

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of different insecticides against pests on two-year old alfalfa grown for seeds.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted in the experimental field of the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS in 2017–2019. The filed experiments were laid out in split plots. The main plots (factor A) were for water supply conditions (no irrigation vs. irrigation); sub-plots (factors B and C) were for application of insecticides. Seeds were sown in wide rows with interrows of 70 cm.

Results and discussion. When the two-year old alfalfa canopy (budding onset) was inspected before insecticide treatment, the average numbers of pests were as follows: alfalfa plant bug – 3.0 specimens/10 sweeps, alfalfa aphid – 20.0 specimens/10 sweeps, beet webworm – 3.0 specimens/10 sweeps, alfalfa weevil (imagoes/grubs) – 1.0/3.0 specimens/10 sweeps, and alfalfa seed weevil – 1.0 specimens/10 sweeps. Treatment 1 reduced the pest numbers in the canopy: alfalfa plant bug – by 70.0–93.3%, alfalfa aphid – by 93.0–97.5%, beet webworm – by 80.0–96.7, alfalfa weevil (imagoes/grubs) – by 60.0–90.0%/73.3–93.3%, and alfalfa seed weevil – by 76.0–94.0%, depending on the insecticide. Treatment 2 helped to reduce the pest numbers in the canopy. Insecticide containing active substances chlorpyrifos 500 g/L and cypermethrin 50 g/L applied at a dose of 1.00 L/ha was the most effective. The highest seed yield was achieved after treatment 1 with insecticide containing active ingredients chlorpyrifos 500 g/L and cypermethrin 50 g/L applied at a dose of 1.00 L/ha and treatment 2 with insecticide containing active ingredients chlorantraniliprole 200 g/L and lambda-cyhalothrin 50 g/L applied at a dose of 0.17 L/ha and 0.15 L/ha, respectively.

Conclusions. The highest seed yield was achieved after treatment 1 with insecticide containing active ingredients chlorpyrifos 500 g/L and cypermethrin 50 g/L applied at a dose of 1.00 L/ha and treatment 2 with insecticide containing active ingredients chlorantraniliprole 200 g/L and lambda-cyhalothrin 50 g/L applied at a dose of 0.17 L/ha and 0.15 L/ha, respectively

References

Katungi E et al. Common bean in Eastern and Southern Africa: a situation and outlook analysis. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, 2009; 61 p.

Ochilo WN, Nyamasyo GH. Pest status of bean stem maggot (Ophiomyia spp.) and black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) in Taita district, Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agro Ecosystems. 2011; 13(1): 91‒97.

Munyasa AJ. Evaluation of drought tolerance mechanisms in mesoamerican dry bean genotypes. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, 2013. 191 p.

Spiridonov YuY. et al. Technology of cultivation of spring durum wheat with use of drugs Secator turbo, Baritone, Falcon, Nagro and others. Agrarnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2017; 3: 30–36. DOI: 10.28983/asj.v0i3.47.

Strizhkov NI et al. Integrated technology for protection of field crops from diseases, pests and weeds based on biological and chemical methods. Saratov, 2017; 56 p.

Spiridonov YuYa et al. Development of integrated technology for protection of field crops from diseases, pests and weeds based on biological and chemical methods. Agrarnyiy nauchnyiy zhurnal. 2017; 9: 37–42.

Dudkin IV et al. Ecological aspects of formation of systems of agriculture and plant protection. Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy selskohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2017; 7: 2–7.

Peter KH, Swella GB, Mushobozy DM. Effect of plant populations on the incidence of bean stem maggot (Ophiomyia spp.) in common bean intercropped with maize. Plant Protection Science. 2009; 45(4): 148–155. DOI: 10.17221/19/2009-PPS.

Dhungana SK et al. Comparative effect of different insecticides on the growth and yield of soybeans. Plant Protect. Sci. 2020; 56: 206–213. DOI: 10.17221/77/2019-PPS.

Hudenko MN et al. Productivity of milk thistle depending on the methods of soil treatment and chemical protection in the dry steppe of the Volga region. Agrarnyiy nauchnyiy zhurnal. 2016; 12: 43–49.

Spiridonov YuYa et al. Features of the influence of chemical plant protection products on the dynamics of nutrients in plants, their chemical composition and development conditions. Agrarnyiy nauchnyiy zhurnal. 2018. 10. 37–40. DOI: 10.28983/asj.v0i10.606.

Abate T, Ampofo JKO. Insect pests of beans in Africa: their ecology and management. Annual Review of Entomology. 1996; 41: 45–73. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000401.

Acreman TM, Dixon AF. Developmental patterns in the wheat and resistant to cereal aphids. Crop Protect. 1985; 4: 322–328. DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(85)90034-1.

Aheer GM et al. Effects of swoing dates on aphids and grain yield in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Research. 1993; 31: 75–79.

Nderitu JH, Kayumbo HY, Mueke JM. Beanfly infestation on common beans Phaseolus vulgaris in Kenya. Insect Science and Its Application. 1990; 11: 35–41. DOI: 10.1017/S1742758400019810.

Forbes VE et al. Ecological models in support of regulatory risk assessments of pesticides: developing a strategy for the future. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2009; 5: 167–172. DOI: 10.1897/ieam_2008-029.1.

Stoddard FL et al. Integrated pest management in faba bean. Field Crops Research. 2010; 115: 308–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.07.002.

Maluta NKP et al. Foliar spraying of tomato plants with systemic insecticides: effects on feeding behavior, mortality and oviposition of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and inoculation efficiency of tomato chlorosis virus. Insects. 2020: 11(9),559; 2–14. DOI: 10.3390/insects11090559

Gilbertson RL, Rojas M, Natwick E. Development of integrated pest management (IPM) strategies for whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)-transmissible geminiviruses. In The Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Interaction with Geminivirus-Infected Host Plants. IN: WMO Thompson, ed. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; 323–356. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1524-0_12.

Godfrey LD et al. UC IPM pest management guidelines: cotton: insects and mites. UC ANR Publ. 3444, 2001. 70 p.

Summers CG. Integrated pest management in forage alfalfa. Int. Pest Man. Rev. 1998; 3: 127–154. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009654901994.

Vigera SM, Ruban MB. Seed alfalfa. Agrobiological system of protection against pests. Zakhyst roslyn. 1997; 5: 24–25.

Goloborodko SP, Snegovoy VS, Sahno GV. Alfalfa. KHerson: Aylant, 2007. 328 P.

Vyhera SM. Protection of alfalfa seed crops in the conditions of biological and intensive agriculture. Zakhyst roslyn. 2002; 2: 6–8.

Devyatkin AM, Markova IA, Belyiy AI. Pests, diseases and weeds of alfalfa agrocenosis. Krasnodar, 2013. 477 p.

Artohin KS. The method of mowing with an entomological net. Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. 2010; 11: 45–48.

Tribel SO et al. Methods of testing and application of pesticides. In: SO Tribel, ed. Kyiv: SvIt, 2001. 448 p.

Alekhin VT, Mikhaylikova VV, Mihina NG. Economic thresholds of pests, diseases and weeds in crops: a guide Moscow: FGBNU «Rosinformagroteh», 2016. 76 p.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-12

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION, SEED INDUSTRY AND SEED STUDYING