Laboratory drought resistance of pea breeding accessions in PEG-6000

Authors

  • L.M. Shevchenko Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2021.251035

Keywords:

pea, PEG-6000, depression of growth processes, rank of depression index, variety, breeding lines

Abstract

The results on the laboratory drought resistance determined by germination of pea seeds in 8.6% PEG-6000 are presented. The depression of root and shoot growth processes was determined for seeds harvested in different years (2018–2020).

The study purpose was to evaluate the laboratory drought resistance of pea varieties and breeding material in PEG-6000.

Materials and methods. Seeds harvested in 2018–2020 were investigated. Fifty-nine pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions (breeding varieties, breeding material, collection specimens) were tested. Pea seeds were germinated in 8.6% PEG-6000. Control seeds were germinated in distilled water. The germination temperature was 20°C. On day 7, the shoot and root lengths were measured in the control and experiment and the depression of root and shoot growth processes was evaluated.

Results and discussion. Across the study years, the depression of the «root length» trait in the pea accessions represented by varieties and breeding material varied -96.3% to 67.8%, and the depression of the «shoot length» trait was not negative in the study years, ranging 8.3% to 91.7%. The root length depression in the pea accessions ranged -52.1% to 67.8% in 2018, -96.3% to 67.7% in 2019, and -33.6% to 61.6% in 2020. The shoot length depression also varied significantly across the study years: from 22.3% to 88.7% in 2018, from 8.3% to 91.7% in 2019, and from 15.8% to 87.1% in 2020.

If we take into account the significant values of the coefficient of variation for the depression of root growth processes, it may confirm the fact that differences in the response to drought can be predicted from this trait. For the convenience of analysis of the obtained data, the accessions were ranked according to the depression of «root length» and «shoot length» traits. It should be noted that the coefficient of variation for the depression of the «shoot length» trait in 2018 and 2020 was high (23.0% and 28.3%, respectively) and very similar. In general, no stimulatory effect of PEG-6000 was observed for this parameter, unlike the «root length» trait in some accessions. Despite the fact that Zekon, Hotik and Mascara are varieties bred in Western Europe, they were among the best ones in this sample according to the depression level. Of the pea accessions bred at PPI NAAS, breeding line SL 15-95 was the best one; variety Ramonskiy 77, a leafy variety bred in the USSR, was highly resistant, judging from the depression of growth processes. It should be noted that in our experiments the depression level of growth processes in PEG-6000 was not associated with yield. Thus, the accession with the lowest rank sum, SL 15-95, gave an average yield of 1.86 t/ha in 2018–2020. At the same time, Rezonator, a variety with the rank sum of 261, produced 1.84 t/ha; Hotik with the rank sum of 89–1.90 t/ha. Ramonskiy 77 with the rank sum of 83 gave a yield of 1.49 t/ha, and Chekryhinskyi with the largest rank sum in the experiment (294) gave a yield of 1.33 t/ha.

The Spearman coefficient for the matrices of depression ranks showed high identity. Thus, the Spearman coefficient (rs) was 0.98 between the matrices for all study years. Hence, to determine the laboratory drought resistance by germination in PEG-6000, it is sufficient to replicate the experiment on seeds harvested in two years.

Conclusions. Thus, the obtained data on the depression of growth processes in the pea accessions in PEG-6000 are not mature and require further, more in-depth study.

References

Osmolovskaya N, Shumilina J, Kim A, Didio A, Grishina T, Bilova T, Keltsieva OA, Zhukov V, Tikhonovich I, Tarakhovskaya E, Frolov A, Wessjohann LA. Methodology of drought stress research: experimental setup and physiological characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19: 4089. DOI:10.3390/ijms19124089.

Priya S, Bansal R, Kumar G, Dikshit HK, Kumari J, Pandey R, Singh AK, Tripathi K, Singh N, Kumari NKP, Kumar S, Kumar A. Root trait variation in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) germplasm under drought stress. Plants. 2021; 10: 2410. DOI: 10.3390/plants10112410.

Beliaeva RV, Holovina EV. Peculiarities of variability of economic characteristics in peas of various origins. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2021; 2(38): 45–51. DOI: 10.24412/2309-348X-2021-2-45-51.

Cokkizgin A. Effects of hydro and osmo-priming on seed vigor of pea (Pisum sativum L). Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2013; 2(6): 225–228. DOI: 10.11648/j.aff.20130206.14.

Marjani A, Farsi M, Rahimizadeh M. Investigation of drought tolerance of ten pea genotypes in seedling stage using Polyethylene glycol 6000. Journal of Agricultural sciences. 2006; 12(1): 17–30. URL: https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=102029.

Horlacheva OV, Horbachova SN, Liutenko VS, Antsyferova OV. Selection of osmotic PEG 6000 concentration to determine the drought resistance of millet genotypes during seed ger-mination. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 2021; 182(3): 30–36. DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2021-3-30-36.

Daouda Osmani S, Mouhamadou Mounkaila B. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 on germination and seedling growth of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] and LD50 for in vitro screening for drought tolerance. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2014; 13(37): 3742–3747. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2013.13514.

Koskosidis A, Khah E, Mavromatis A, Pavli O, Vlachostergios DN. Effect of PEG-induced drought stress on germination of ten chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Notulae Botan-icae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2020; 48(1): 294–304. DOI: 10.15835/nbha48111799.

Muscolo A, Sidari M, Anastasi U, Santonoceto C, Maggio A. Effect of PEG-induced drought stress on seed germination of four lentil genotypes. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2014; 9(1): 354–363. DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2013.835880.

Punya SDS, Sujatha B. Drought – induced accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in two pigeon pea (Сajanus cajan l. millsp.) cultivars. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development. 2014; 3(4): 302–306. URL: http://www.internationaljournalcorner.com/ in-dex.php/ijird_ojs/article/view/134692/93815.

Rezayian M, Niknam V, Ebrahimzadeh H. Effects of drought stress on the seedling growth, development, and metabolic activity in different cultivars of canola. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2018; 64(3): 360–369. DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2018.1436407.

Heikal MMD, Shaddad MA. Alleviation of osmotic stress on seed germination and seedling growth of cotton, pea and wheat by proline. Phyton (Austria). 1982; 22(2): 275–287 URL: https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/PHY_22_2_0275-0287.pdf.

Wang C, Zhou LB, Zhang GB, Xu Y, Gao X, Jiang N, Zhang LY, Shao MB. Effects of drought stress simulated by polyethylene glycol on seed germination, root and seedling growth, and seedling antioxidant characteristics in Job’s tears. Agricultural Sciences, 2018; 9: 991–1006. URL: https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.98069.

Attia H, Alamer KH, Ouhibi C, Oueslati S, Lachaâl M. Research article interaction between salt stress and drought stress on some physiological parameters in two pea cultivars. Int.J.Bot. 2020; 16(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.3923/ijb.2020.1.8.

Okçu G, Kaya MD, Atak M. Effects of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 2005; 29: 237–242. URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/119916.

Wu C, Wang Q, Xie B, Wang Z, Cui J, Hu T. Effects of drought and salt stress on seed ger-mination of three leguminous species. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011; 10(78): 17954–17961. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.2018.

Soboleva HV, Suvorova GN, Bobkov SV, Uvarov VN. Results pea breeding for drought re-sistance. Zemledelie. 2014; 4: 21–23. URL: na-zasuhoustoychivost/viewer.

Soboleva HV, Zelenov AA, Sobolev AN. Characterization of chameleon pea accessions in terms of drought resistance. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2021; 2(38): 38–44. DOI: 10.24412/2309-348X-2021-2-38-44.

Soboleva HV, Zelenov AA, Sobolev AN. Evaluation of hybrid pea populations for osmo-resistance and creation of promising lines on their basis in breeding for drought resistance. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2020; 4(36): 18–23. DOI: 10.24411/2309-348X-2020-11199.

Soboleva HV, Sobolev AN. Screening of different pea types for resistance to osmotic stress in in vitro selective systems. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2019; 3(31): 22–27. DOI: 10.24411/2309-348X-2019-11109.

Soboleva HV, Zelenov AA, Sobolev AN. Comparative assessment of resistance of prom-ising pea breeding lines with modified architectonics of the leaf apparatus to osmotic stress. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2018; 3(27): 5–40. DOI: 10.24411/2309-348X-2018-11029.

Soboleva HV, Budarina HA, Sobolev AN. Comprehensive evaluation of regenerant pea lines obtained by in vitro cell selection. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2017; 2(22): 36–41. URL: https://journal.vniizbk.ru/jurnals/22/j_vniizbk_2017_2-036-041.pdf.

Zinchenko MO, Bavol AV, Dubrovna OV, Lialko II. Effectiveness of different selective systems for selection of drought-tolerant bread wheat forms. Faktory eksperymentalnoyi evo-liutsii organizmiv. 2011; 11: 258–263. URL: http://utgis.org.ua/images/pdf/faktory/ tom_11.pdf.

Vus N, Vasylenko A, Lutenko V, Kobyzeva L, Besuhla O, Shevchenko L, Ponurenko S, Baili F, Saliy D. Concentration effect of polyethylene glycol in evaluation of grain legumes for drought tolerance. Žemės Ūkio Mokslai. 2020; 27(2): 149–159.

Dospekhov BA. Metods of field experience. Moscow: Kolos, 1985. 351 p.

Bilgili D, Atak M, Mavi K. Effects of peg-induced drought stress on germination and seed-ling performance of bread wheat genotypes. Yyü Tar Bil Derg (Yyu J Agr Sci). 2019; 29(4): 765–771. DOI: 10.29133/yyutbd. 595627.

Kachout SS, Benyoussef S, Zoghlami A, Chakroun M. Research article effect of water deficit during germination and flowering period of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L. Int. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 2019; 13(1): 12–18. DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2019.12.18.

Soboleva HV, Beliaeva RV. Evaluation of pea accessions from the collection of the All-Union Research Institute of Plant Breeding named after NI Vavilov for relative drought re-sistance. Zernobobovyie I krupianyie kultury. 2020; 3(35): 26–31. DOI: 10.24411/2309-348X-2020-11181.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION