Efficiency of different cycles of multiple individual-family selection in the breeding of multi-sprout sugar beet pollinators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2021.251037Keywords:
sugar beet, multi-sprout pollinators, line, population, multiple individual-family selection, selection cycle, heterosis, yield, sugar contentAbstract
Purpose. To create multi-sprout sugar beet pollinators with a narrowed genetic basis, to assess their productivity and combining ability over time at different stages of multiple individual-family selection.
Materials and methods. The studies were conducted at the Tobacco Experimental Station of the National Research Center «Institute of Agriculture of NAAS» in the Laboratory of Sugar Beet Breeding in 2009–2020. Seven diploid multi-sprout sugar beet populations bred in Ukraine were taken as starting material. New multi-sprout pollinators were obtained by multiple individual-family selection. Breeding accessions were tested by the method developed by scientists of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of NAAS. The GCA was evaluated using unidirectional cyclic crosses on the basis of three CMS-testers.
Results and discussion. The results demonstrated a high efficiency of two and three cycles of individual-family selection for increasing the root yields of the multi-sprout sugar beet pollinators. The root yields increased by 11.7% and 13.5% after two and three selection cycles, respectively, related to the original populations. Subsequent selection cycles (four and five) were less effective due to inbreeding depression. The yields of the multi-sprout pollinators was 106.3% and 98.2% after four and five selection cycles, respectively, related to the original populations. The multi-sprout pollinators from selection cycles four and five had the highest sugar content in roots: 121.6% and 119.5%, respectively, related to the original populations.
As to the compound trait of «sugar collection», the highest productivity in the multi-sprout pollinators was observed after three selection cycles (119.5%). In subsequent cycles of selection, this parameter decreased.
The yield and sugar content in roots of the best diploid multi-sprout sugar beet pollinators varied between 108.2–116.3% and 98.6–105.5%, respectively, related to the group reference. As to the sugar collection and output, they exceeded the group reference by 9.2–19.2% and 9.5–21.8%, respectively.
Conclusions. In the 2009–2020 studies, the changes in the performance characteristics of the multi-sprout sugar beet pollinators from different cycles of multiple individual-family selection were investigated over time. The highest basic productivity was seen in the multi-sprout pollinators from selection cycle 3, which should be used both as sources of valuable genotypes – ancestors of lines and directly as parents of hybrids. Ten highly productive multi-sprout sugar beet pollinators with the optimal combinations of the most significant breeding-genetic traits have been created.
References
Royik MV. Beets. Kyiv: XXI, 2001. 320 p.
Sabluk PT, Kodenska M.Yu., Vlasov VI. Sugar beet production of Ukraine: problems of reviv-al, prospects of development. Kyiv: NSC IAE, 2007. 390 p.
Tomashevska OA, Petrynyak NS. Problems of development and increase of economic efficiency of sugar beet production. Problemy ekonomiky. 2017; 2: 347–352.
Danylyshyn MS. Efficiency of activity of sugar beet industry of Ukraine. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 2016; 1: 108–111.
Royik MV, Korneeva MO, Dubchak OV, Vakulenko PI, Andreeva LS. Creating a model of new generation sugar beet hybrids. Metodychni rekomendaciyi. Kyiv: IBK I CB, 2015. 20 p.
Royik MV, Prysyazhnyuk OI, Kononyuk NO, Kulik OG. Features of formation of productivity of hybrids of sugar beets of domestic selection. Sortovyvchennya ta okhorona prav na sorty roslyn. 2020; 16 (3): 277–283.
Korneeva MO, Chemeris LM, Matsuk MB. Selection of pollinators for selection of high-sugar hybrids of sugar beets with high adaptive potential. Visnyk agrarnoyi nauky. 2012; 11: 46–48.
Royik MV, Korneeva MO. Selection of sugar beets. In: Special selection of field crops. Molotsky MYa, ed. Bila Tserkva, 2010. Р. 280–285.
Biancardi E, Campbell L, Biaggi M. Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet. Science Publishers. USA. 2005. Р.173–206.
Richardson K. Traditional Breeding in Sugar Beet. Sugar Tech. 2010; 12(3–4): 181–186.
Korneeva MO, Vlasyuk MV. Systems of controlled crosses in assessing the combination ability of breeding materials of sugar beets. Faktory eksperymentalnoyi evolyutsiyi orhanizmiv. Kyiv: Agrarna nauka, 2003. Р. 227–233.
Frese L, Desprez B, Ziegler D. Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. In: Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T, editors. Broadening the genetic base of crop production. UK: Wallingford, 2001. P. 295–309.
Genetic bases of plant selection. Vol.2. Private selection of plants. Kilchevsky AV, Khotyleva LV, editors. Minsk, 2010. 579 p.
Kornіyenko AV, Morhun AV, Trush SH. Selection of beets for heterosis (Вeta vulgaris L.). Voronezh, 2007. 255 р.
Roik NV, Korneeva MA. Combination ability of sugar beet pollinators of different genetic structure by elements of productivity. In: Encyclopedia of the genus Beta: Biology, genetics and selection of beets. Mаlеtsky SI, ed. Novosibirsk: Sova, 2010. Р. 525–541.
Hassani M, Heidari B, Stevanato P. Combining abilities of sugar beet genotypes for root‐and sugar‐related traits under multi‐environment trials. Plant Breeding. 2019; 139(1): 192–206.
Balkov IYa. Selection of sugar beet for heterosis. Moscow: Rosselkhozizdat. 1978. 167 р.
Royik MV, Gisbullin NG, Sinchenko VM, Prysiazhnyuk OI. Methods of research in beet grow-ing. Kyiv: FOP Korzun DYu, 2014. 374 p.
Dospehov BA. Methods of field experiments with the basic of statistical procesing of research resalts. Mоscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 S.H. Trush, O.А. Parfenіuk, L.А. Balanіuk, V.M. Tatarchuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.