Sowing rate effect the performance and seed quality of pea cultivars in the eastern forest-steppe of Ukraine

Authors

  • S. I. Popov The Рlant Production Institute nd. a. V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • O. M. Hlubokyi Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • S. V. Avramenko Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2022.261001

Keywords:

pea, cultivar, sowing rate, performance, yield, seed quality

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the sowing rate effect on the performance and seed quality of pea cultivars in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted in the stationary crop rotation of the Plant Production Institute named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS in 2018–2021 on basic mineral fertilization at a dose of N30P30K30. The soil was typical mid-humus slightly-leached chernozem. The forecrop was spring cereals. Zoned pea cultivars Oplot and Metsenat were investigated in the experiments. The sowing rate was 0.8 million, 1.0 million, 1.2 million, and 1.4 million seeds/ha. The farming techniques, except for the issues under investigation, were conventional the zone. The data were processed by analysis of variance.

Results and discussion. Under the instable weather in 2018–2021, on average, the largest numbers of pods and seeds per plant and the highest 1000-seed weight in the pea cultivars were recorded at the sowing rate of 0.8 million seeds/ha. The increase in the rate to 1.4 million seeds/ha resulted in a significant decline in these parameters: by 10.9−11.4%, 16.0–18.3% and 5.3–7.8%, respectively. The differences in the 1000-seed weight between the ‘1.0 million seeds/ha’ and ‘1.2 million seeds/ha’ variants as well as between ‘1.2 million seeds/ha’ and ‘1.4 million seeds/ha’ variants were insignificant: 2.3−2.4 g and 4.1−9.5 g, respectively. The pre- harvest plant density was vary similar regardless of the sowing rates: 0.75−1.12 million plants/ha in Oplot and 0.74−1.11 million plants/ha in Metsenat. At the same time, the pre-harvest plant survival decreased when the sowing rate was raised: 79.3−80.0% (depending on the cultivar) at 1.4 million seeds/ha vs. 85.0−87.0% at 1.0 million and 1.2 million seeds/ha. The highest pre-harvest plant survival (92.5−93.8%) was recorded when the both cultivars were sown at the rate of 0.8 million seeds/ha. Thus, pea cultivars were able to self-regulate their plant density at different sowing rates.

On the average across the four years in the ‘0.8 million seeds/ha’ variant, the performance of Oplot amounted to 2.67 t/ha. When the sowing rate was increased to 1.2 million and 1.4 million seeds/ha, the performance rose by 0.35 t/ha and 0.41 t/ha or by 13.1% and 15.4%, respectively. At the same time, the increase in the sowing density to 1.4 million seeds/ha did not significantly boost the seed yield compared to the ‘1.2 million seeds/ha' variant. In Metsenat, the differences in the yield depending on the sowing rate were smaller (2.51−2.75 t/ha).The biggest yield was noted at the sowing rate of 1.2 million seeds/ha and there was a downward trend in the plant performance as the plant density was increased.

Under the most favorable weather in 2020 and 2021, the highest yields were obtained when the cultivars were sown at the rates of 1.2 million and 1.4 million seeds/ha, without any significant difference between them. In 2020, the maximum yield was given by Oplot (4.09 and 4.20 t/ha, respectively, which was by 14.2% and 17.3% higher than that in the ‘0.8 million seeds/ha’ variant). Metsenat responded more weakly to the favorable weather. When the sowing density was raised from 1.0 million seeds/ha to 1.4 million seeds/ha, the yield was 3.59–3.77 t/ha; the desirable gain in the seed yield of 0.20 t/ha or 5.6% was provided at the rate of 1.2 million seeds/ha. In unfavorable 2018, there was no significant difference in the yields from the cultivars between the studied variants.

There were differences in the seed quality of the cultivars depending on weather and sowing rate. On average across the sowing rates, Oplot had a higher content of protein in seeds: 21.35%, which was by 0.26% higher than in Metsenat. On average across the study years, a higher content of protein in seeds were noted with the sowing rate of 0.8 million seeds/ha: 1.68% in Oplot and 21.40% in Metsenat. As the sowing rate was increased to 1.0 million and 1.2 million seeds/ha, the protein content in seeds reduced by 0.20–0.37%; when the rate was increased to 1.4 million seeds/ha - by 0.65– 0.67%. Regardless of the sowing rate, Oplot produced a higher yield and accumulated more protein in seeds than Metsenat.

Conclusions. On average under the unstable weather in 2018−2021, the highest indicators of the pea performance were recorded at the sowing rate of 0.8 million seeds/ha, and its increase to 1.4 million seeds/ha led to their reduction. The pre-harvest plant density differed insignificantly between the cultivars related to the sowing rates, plant survival rates decreased with increasing sowing density. The pre-harvest highest survival of plants was achieved at the rate of 0.8 million seeds/ha − 92.5−93.8%. The pea cultivars were able to self-regulate their plant density.

On the average across the four years in the ‘0.8 million seeds/ha’ variant, the yield from Oplot was 2.67 t/ha, increasing by 0.35 and 0.41 t/ha or by 13.1 and 15.4% at the sowing rates of 1.2 million and 1.4 million seeds/ha, respectively. 1.2 million seeds/ha turned out to be the optimal sowing rate, and an increase in the sowing density led to a reduction in the plant performance.

There were differences in the seed quality of the cultivars depending on the weather and sowing rate, in particular, the highest content of protein in seeds was detected in Oplot sown at the rate of 0.8 million seeds/ha.

References

Lemishko SM, Kulyk AO. Pea seed production in the Steppe zone of Ukraine and increase in its efficiency due to bioagents.Zernovi kultury. 2021; 5(2): 310−320. https://doi.org/10.31867/2523-4544/0190.

Hlubokyi OM, Avramenko SV, Popov SI. Pea cultivar performance depending on growing conditions in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Henetychi resursy roslyn. 2021; 29: 113–122. https://doi.org/10.36814/pgr.2021.29.11.

Zhuikov AG, Lahutenko KV. The pea in Ukraine − status, problems, prospects (a review article). Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk: zemlerobstvo, roslynnytstvo, ovochivnytstvo ta bashtannytstvo. 2017; 98; 65–97.

Bezuglyi IM, Vasylenko AO. Growth dynamics and lodging resistance in the ontogenesis of determinant pea cultivars. Sel. nasinn. 2001; 85: 115–121.

Cherenkov AV, Klysha AI, Hyrka AD, Kulinich OO. Legumes: current growing technologies. Dnipropetrovsk: Aktsent PP, 2014. 110 p.

Kyrychenko VV, Ohurtsov YuYe, Kostromitin VM. Pea cultivation technology. Kharkiv: PPI, 2011. 99 p.

Pylypenko VS, Honchar LM, Kalenska SM. Pea performance depending on cultivation technology elements. Zemlerobstvo. 2016; 91(2): 51−55.

Telecalo NV. Impact of technological methods on pea cultivation. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo. 2019; 2(13); 84–93. https://doi.org/10.37128/2707-5826-2019-2-8.

Popov SI, Kostromitin VM, Hlubokyi OM, Hutianskyi RA et al. Peculiarities of the cultivation technology of new seed pea cultivars (guidelines). Kharkiv: PPI, 2021. 26 p.

Petrychenko VF, Antypin RA. Photosynthetic performance of the pea depending on technological methods of cultivation in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Kormy I kormovyrobnytstvo. 2006; 57: 3–13.

Kaminskyi VF, Dvoretska SP, Kostyna TP. The weather and fertilizer effects on the performance of pea cultivars. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NNTs «Instytut zemlerobstva UAAN». 2012; 3–4: 82–90.

Mykhailenko NP. Productive processes in legumes under the influence of weather and technological factors in the northern Steppe. [dissertation]. Institute of Grain Management of UAAS. Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 2005.

Hamaiunova V, Tuz MS. Effects of cultivation technology elements on the performance of pea cultivars in the Southern Steppe. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NNTs «Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN». 2016; 1; 46–57.

Dmytrenko PO, Vytrykhovskyi PI. Fertilizers and sowing density in field crops. Kyiv: Urozhai, 1975. 248p.

RozvadovskyiAM, BabychAO, PetrychenkoVFetal. Legumes in intensive agriculture. Kyiv: Urozhai, 1990. 173 p.

Haidukevich LI. Nutrition of legumes. Moscow: Znaniie, 1965. 32 p.

Gyrka AD, Tkalich ID, Sydorenko YuYa, Bochevar OV, Ilyenko OV. Peculiarities of the seed productivity in different pea cultivars in the Northern Steppe of Ukraine. Zernovi kultury. 2018; 2(2): 267–273. https://doi.org/10.31867/2523-4544/0035.

Ilienko OV. Yields of leafy peas affected by fertilizers and sowing rates in the Steppe. Biuleten Instytutu silskogoho hospodarstva stepovoyi zony. 2013; 4: 33−37.

Lykhochvor VV, Andrushko MO Pea performance depending on cultivars and sowing rates. Visnyk Agrarnoyi Nauky Prychornomorya. 2020; 2: 54–62. https://doi.org/10.31521/2313-092Х/2020-2(106)-6).

Hlubokyi OM. Yield capacity of pea cultivars depending on sowing rates and nutrition in the stationary crop rotation. Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Conference: Scientific Principles of Improving the Efficiency of Agricultural Production (2020 Nov 26–27). Part 1. Kharkiv: KhNAU, 2020. P. 139–140.

Tulbek MC, Lam Y, Wang P, Asavajaru A. Pea: A sustainable vegetable protein crop. Sustainable protein sources. 2017. Р. 145−164. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00009-3.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-08

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION, SEED INDUSTRY AND SEED STUDYING