Determination of drought resistance of soybean breeding material

Authors

  • S. S. Ryabukha Plant Production Institute named after V. Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • P. V. Chernyshenko Plant Production Institute named after V. Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • І. М. Bezuglу Plant Production Institute named after V. Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • M. G. Golokhorynska Bukovyna State Agricultural Experimental Station of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2023.283655

Keywords:

soybean, variety testing, hydrothermal condition, drought resistance, productivity, drought resistance indices, breeding, breeding material

Abstract

The purpose and objectives of the study. To determine the resistance of soybean genotypes to drought according to drought resistance indices based on the analysis of yield in years contrasting in terms of hydrometeorological conditions.

Materials and research methods. The material for determining the influence of year conditions on the level of average yield of soybeans and drought resistance were varieties and breeding numbers of the competitive variety test (CVT). Experiments were carried out in four repetitions with a plot area of 25 m2. Drought intensity (D) was determined by the formula proposed by Fischer R.A. and Maurer R. Differentiation of breeding numbers and varieties of CVT soybeans was carried out according to yield in 2016 and 2018 according to indices of drought susceptibility (DSI), drought tolerance (TOL), average yield (MP), yield stability (YSI), yield (YI), stress tolerance (STI), geometric mean yield (GMP). Processing of research results was carried out according to B.O. Dospehov [27] using STATISTICA 10 and Excel programs.

The discussion of the results. During the research period (2008–2021), the highest yield of soybeans in CVT was obtained in 2016 – 2.57 t/ha, and the lowest in 2018 – 0.50 t/ha. A comparison of soybean yield in CVT in 2016 and 2018 showed that the average yield loss due to drought was 2.07 t/ha, or 81%. At the minimum yield, losses were equal to 1.78 t/ha, or 84.8%. At the maximum – 2.19 t/ha and 75.5%, respectively. Therefore, the minimum yield difference was greater than the maximum yield difference. The level of drought intensity (D) in the dry year of 2018 was equal to 0.81.

According to yield indicators, a number of indices were calculated and analyzed, which characterize the resistance of samples to drought. The value of the drought susceptibility index (DSI) ranged from 0.87 to 1.09, with an average value of 1.00. The drought tolerance index (TOL) was 1.61–2.41 with an average value of 2.11. The average yield (MP) was in the range of 2.34–3.15 t/ha and had an average value of 2.85 t/ha. The yield stability index (YSI) value varied from 0.12 to 0.30 with an average value of 0.19. The yield index under stress conditions (YI) was 64.6–143.3%, with an average value of 98.9%. The stress yield index (YI) ranged from 64.6% to 143.3%, with an average value of 98.9%. The geometric mean (or proportional mean) yield (GMP) of the studied samples ranged from 0.92 t/ha to 1.38 t/ha, with a median value of 1.11 t/ha.

According to each index, the researched soybean samples were differentiated and drought-resistant breeding material was selected.

Conclusions. According to most indices: stress susceptibility (DSI), drought tolerance (TOL), crop stability (YSI), productivity (YI), stress tolerance (STI) and geometric mean yield (GMP) number CVT 23-18 (3836 / 76-130 selection). According to five indices: stress susceptibility (DSI), yield stability (YSI), yield (YI), stress tolerance (STI) and geometric mean yield (GMP) number CVT 16-18 (Volgohradka / Mriya) stood out. Number CVT 49-18 (Kharkivska 56 / Ilsoy) stood out according to the indicators of four indices: average yield (MR), yield (YI), stress tolerance (STI) and geometric mean yield (GMP). According to three indices, it is identified as drought-resistant number CVT 22-18 (selection №14) – according to indices of stress susceptibility (DSI), drought tolerance (TOL) and yield stability (YSI); numbers CVT 36-18 (Kharkivska zernokormova / Yug 30) and CVT 24-18 (Kharkivska 62 / Hodson) – according to indices of yield (YI), stress tolerance (STI) and geometric mean yield (GMP). Selection number CVT 28-18 (4305-04) stood out according to stress tolerance index (TOL) and average yield level (MR). Number 29-18 (Narrow-leaved / mutant 82-205) stood out according to the stress tolerance index (TOL) and the level of average yield (MR). Numbers CVT 50-18 (selection from Pasteter Schwarus) and CVT 37-18 (Success / Dream) were distinguished by indices of susceptibility to stress (DSI) and yield stability (YSI). According to the level of average yield (MR), number CVT 20-18 (Kharkivska 35 / Kyivska 27) and Podyaka variety stood out. The Roksolana variety stood out according to the stress tolerance index (TOL). Selected genotypes of soybeans with a high level of resistance to abiotic stress are recommended for use in crop breeding for high drought resistance.

References

Babych A.O., Babych-Poberezhna A.A. Breeding and production of soybeans in Ukraine. Vinnytsia, 2008. 215 p.

Netis I.T. Climate change in the irrigation area. Irrigated agriculture. 1994. Issue 39. P. 7–12.

Romashchenko M.I., Sobko O.O., Savchuk D.P., Kulbida M.I. About some tasks of agricultural science in connection with climate changes. Scientific report-information. K., 2003. 46 p.

Sichkar V. I., Hanzhelo O.Y., Lavrova H.D. Ways to increase the yield of soybeans in conditions of insufficient moisture. Feed and forage production. 2008. Issue 62, P. 163–173.

Sichkar V.I. The current state and prospects of growing leguminous crops on our planet. 2016: legumes and soybeans for the sustainable development of agricultural production in Ukraine: Mater. international conf. August 11–12, 2016. Vinnytsia, 2016. P. 14–15.

Petrychenko V.F. Scientific basis of sustainable association in Ukraine. Fodder and fodder production. 2011. Issue 69. P. 3–10.

Bouslama M., Schapaugh W.T. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. 1984. Issue 29 (5). P. 897–912.

Leshchenko A.K. Soy culture. K.: Naukova Dumka, 1978. 236 p.

Zelentsov S.V., Moshnenko E.V. Breeding and genetic adaptation of soybeans to the developing seasonal aridization of the European south of russia. Feed and forage production. 2013. Issue 76, pp. 8–15.

Ramiers-Valleo P., Kelly J. D. Traits related to drounght resistance in common bean. Euphytica. 1998. Issue 99 (2). P. 127–136.

Richards R.A., Rebetzke G.J., Condor A.G., Herwaarder A.F. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science. 2002. Issue 42 (1). P. 111–121. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1110.

Ribait J.-M., Poland D. Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A Strategic Planning Wopkshop, El Batan, Mexico, 21–25 June. Mexico D. F.: CIMMYT. 1999. 180 h.

Orliuk A.P., Honcharova K.V. The problem of combining high productivity and environmental sustainability of winter wheat varieties. Factors of experimental evolution of organisms: collection of scientific works. K.: Agrarian science, 2003. P. 180–187.

Leshchenko A.K., Sichkar V. I., Mykhailov V.H., Mariushkyn V.F. Soya (genetics, selection, seed production). K.: Naukova Dumka, 1987. 256 p.

Sichkar V. I. State and prospects of selection of leguminous crops. Collection of scientific works of SGI. 2002. Issue 3 (43). P. 92–103.

Diakov A.B., Trunova M.V., Vasyleva T.A. Evaluation of yield potentials and drought resistance of soybean varieties. Oil crops. Scientific and technical bulletin of VNIIMK im. V.S. Pustovoit. 2009. Issue 2 (141). P. 78–86.

Fischer R.A., Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. 1. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1978. Issue 29 (5). P. 897–912.

Allandou M. Evaluation of resistanse to drought in tritipirum lines using drought tolerance indices. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. 2012. Issue 3 (3). P. 461–465.

Darabad G.R. Evaluatiоn the best indicators and identifying the most tolerant varieties to draught in potato varieties. International jornal of biosciences. 2014. Issue 4 (8). P. 189–195.

Dharanguttikar V.M., Bharud R.W., Borkar V.H. Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes for drought tolerance under induced moisture stress. International Jornal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2015. Issue 5 (9). P. 1–11.

Sabaghnia N., Janmohammadi M. Evaluation of selection indices for drought tolerance in some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acta Technologica Agriculturae. 2014. Issue 1. P. 6–12. doi.org/10.2478/ata-2014-0002.

Safavi S.M., Safavi А.S., Safavi S.А. Evaluation of drounght tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) under non stress and drought stress conditions. Journal of Biodivercity and Environmental Sciences. 2015. Issue 5 (1). P. 580–586.

Taledi R., Fayaz F., Naji A. M. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought tolerance in durum wheat (Tricum durum Desf.). General and Plant Physiology. 2009. Issue 35 (1–2). P. 64–74.

Turner N.C. Wright G.C. Siddigue K.H. M. Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy. 2001. Issue 71. P. 193–231. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71015-2.

Rosielle A.A., Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science. 1981. Issue 21. № 6. P. 943–946.

Yucel D., Mart D. Drounght tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotipes. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 2014. Sp. Is. 1 P. 1299–1303.

Gavuzzi P., Rizza F., Palumbo M., Campanile R.G., Rissiardi G.L., Borgh B. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Jornals of Plant Science. 1997. Issue 77 (4). P. 523–531.

Methods of state variety testing of crops. K., 2000. Issue 1. 100 p.

Methods of state variety testing of crops. K., 2001. Issue 2. 68 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

Issue

No. 123 (2023)

Section

PHYSIOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, MOLECULAR GENETICS

License

Copyright (c) 2023 S. S. Ryabukha, P. V. Chernyshenko, І. М. Bezuglу, M. G. Golokhorynska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.

Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.

Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.

Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.